143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31500797)
1. Outcomes of robotic versus non-robotic minimally-invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: An American College of Surgeons NSQIP database analysis.
Harbison GJ; Vossler JD; Yim NH; Murayama KM
Am J Surg; 2019 Dec; 218(6):1223-1228. PubMed ID: 31500797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Long-term outcomes of robot-assisted versus minimally invasive esophagectomy in patients with thoracic esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched study.
Sakurai T; Hoshino A; Miyoshi K; Yamada E; Enomoto M; Mazaki J; Kuwabara H; Iwasaki K; Ota Y; Tachibana S; Hayashi Y; Ishizaki T; Nagakawa Y
World J Surg Oncol; 2024 Mar; 22(1):80. PubMed ID: 38504312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy - our first experience.
Haruštiak T; Jaroščiaková S; Šnajdauf M; Pazdro A; Lischke R
Rozhl Chir; 2023; 102(11):422-429. PubMed ID: 38290818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Robotic assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy versus minimally invasive esophagectomy.
Xue M; Liu J; Lu M; Zhang H; Liu W; Tian H
Front Oncol; 2023; 13():1293645. PubMed ID: 38288099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of thoracic cage width on surgery time and postoperative outcome in minimally invasive esophagectomy.
Mann C; Jezycki T; Berlth F; Hadzijusufovic E; Uzun E; Mähringer-Kunz A; Lang H; Klöckner R; Grimminger PP
Surg Endosc; 2023 Nov; 37(11):8301-8308. PubMed ID: 37679581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Short-term outcomes of robot-assisted versus conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 18,187 patients.
Perry R; Barbosa JP; Perry I; Barbosa J
J Robot Surg; 2024 Mar; 18(1):125. PubMed ID: 38492067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Hybrid laparoscopic versus fully robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: an international propensity-score matched analysis of perioperative outcome.
Jung JO; de Groot EM; Kingma BF; Babic B; Ruurda JP; Grimminger PP; Hölzen JP; Chao YK; Haveman JW; van Det MJ; Rouanet P; Benedix F; Li H; Sarkaria I; van Berge Henegouwen MI; van Boxel GI; Chiu P; Egberts JH; Sallum R; Immanuel A; Turner P; Low DE; Hubka M; Perez D; Strignano P; Biebl M; Chaudry MA; Bruns CJ; van Hillegersberg R; Fuchs HF;
Surg Endosc; 2023 Jun; 37(6):4466-4477. PubMed ID: 36808472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy versus minimally invasive esophagectomy for thoracic lymph node dissection in patients with squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective comparative cohort study.
Lei J; Bai Y; Qiao Z; Ma J
J Thorac Dis; 2024 Mar; 16(3):2115-2124. PubMed ID: 38617764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy versus minimally invasive esophagectomy: A propensity-matched study from a single high-volume institution.
Ekeke CN; Kuiper GM; Luketich JD; Ruppert KM; Copelli SJ; Baker N; Levy RM; Awais O; Christie NA; Dhupar R; Pennathur A; Sarkaria IS
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2023 Aug; 166(2):374-382.e1. PubMed ID: 36732144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: Meticulous surgery minimizing postoperative complications.
Hosoda K; Niihara M; Harada H; Yamashita K; Hiki N
Ann Gastroenterol Surg; 2020 Nov; 4(6):608-617. PubMed ID: 33319150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of clinical outcomes of robotic-assisted and video-assisted esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
Yüksel S; Topal U; Songür MZ; Çalıkoğlu İ; Karaköse E; Ercan E; Teke Z; Bektaş H
J Cancer Res Ther; 2024 Jan; 20(1):410-416. PubMed ID: 38554354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Robotic-Assisted Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy Is Safe and Cost Equivalent Compared to Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy in a Tertiary Referral Center.
Knitter S; Maurer MM; Winter A; Dobrindt EM; Seika P; Ritschl PV; Raakow J; Pratschke J; Denecke C
Cancers (Basel); 2023 Dec; 16(1):. PubMed ID: 38201540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Racial disparities in minimally invasive esophagectomy and gastrectomy for upper GI malignancies.
Haider SF; Ma S; Xia W; Wood KL; Matabele MM; Quinn PL; Merchant AM; Chokshi RJ
Surg Endosc; 2022 Dec; 36(12):9355-9363. PubMed ID: 35411463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Robotic-Assisted Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy.
Stock C; Watkins A; Moffatt-Bruce S; Servais E
Surg Oncol Clin N Am; 2024 Jul; 33(3):519-527. PubMed ID: 38789194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Minimally invasive and robotic esophagectomy: state of the art.
Taurchini M; Cuttitta A
J Vis Surg; 2017; 3():125. PubMed ID: 29078685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. National trends in technique use for esophagectomy: Does primary surgeon specialty matter?
Dyas AR; Mungo B; Bronsert MR; Stuart CM; Mungo AH; Mitchell JD; Randhawa SK; David E; Stewart CL; McCarter MD; Meguid RA
Surgery; 2024 Feb; 175(2):353-359. PubMed ID: 38030524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Minimally Invasive Modified McKeown Esophagectomy.
Shemmeri E; Wee JO
Surg Oncol Clin N Am; 2024 Jul; 33(3):509-517. PubMed ID: 38789193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Robot-Assisted-Minimally Invasive-Transhiatal Esophagectomy (RAMI-THE).
Watson J; Reddy RM
Surg Oncol Clin N Am; 2024 Jul; 33(3):497-508. PubMed ID: 38789192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The change of health-related quality of life after minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis.
Zhang Y; Yang X; Geng D; Duan Y; Fu J
World J Surg Oncol; 2018 May; 16(1):97. PubMed ID: 29793487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Management of Postoperative Infectious Complications After Thoracic Esophagectomy].
Fujita T; Fujiwara N; Sato K; Kajiyama D; Shigeno T; Daiko H
Kyobu Geka; 2023 Sep; 76(10):898-903. PubMed ID: 38056859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
