585 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31500904)
1. Has zirconia made a material difference in implant prosthodontics? A review.
Sadowsky SJ
Dent Mater; 2020 Jan; 36(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 31500904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prosthetic complications with monolithic or micro-veneered implant-supported zirconia single-unit, multiple-unit, and complete-arch prostheses on titanium base abutments: A single center retrospective study with mean follow-up period of 72.35 months.
Saponaro PC; Karasan D; Donmez MB; Johnston WM; Yilmaz B
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2023 Feb; 25(1):99-106. PubMed ID: 36321480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Zirconium dioxide based dental restorations. Studies on clinical performance and fracture behaviour.
Larsson C
Swed Dent J Suppl; 2011; (213):9-84. PubMed ID: 21919311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Rehabilitation of edentulous jaws with zirconia complete-arch fixed implant-supported prostheses: An up to 4-year retrospective clinical study.
Tischler M; Patch C; Bidra AS
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Aug; 120(2):204-209. PubMed ID: 29559219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of zirconia-ceramic and metal-ceramic single crowns.
Pjetursson BE; Valente NA; Strasding M; Zwahlen M; Liu S; Sailer I
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Oct; 29 Suppl 16():199-214. PubMed ID: 30328190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Metal-free materials for fixed prosthodontic restorations.
Poggio CE; Ercoli C; Rispoli L; Maiorana C; Esposito M
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Dec; 12(12):CD009606. PubMed ID: 29261853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Digital workflow in full-arch implant rehabilitation with segmented minimally veneered monolithic zirconia fixed dental prostheses: 2-year clinical follow-up.
Papaspyridakos P; Kang K; DeFuria C; Amin S; Kudara Y; Weber HP
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2018 Jan; 30(1):5-13. PubMed ID: 28792115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Monolithic Zirconia Single Crowns Supported by Narrow or Standard Diameter Titanium-zirconium Implants in Posterior Sites: One-year Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial.
Alsabeeha NHM; Amir-Rad F; Ma S; Shah M; Hannawi H; Tawse-Smith A; Duncan WJ; Baqain ZH; Atieh MA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2024 May; 0(0):1-23. PubMed ID: 38728047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fracture Resistance and Mode of Failure of Ceramic versus Titanium Implant Abutments and Single Implant-Supported Restorations.
Sghaireen MG
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Jun; 17(3):554-61. PubMed ID: 24118925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical performance of tooth- or implant-supported veneered zirconia single crowns: 42-month results.
Cantner F; Cacaci C; Mücke T; Randelzhofer P; Hajtó J; Beuer F
Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Dec; 23(12):4301-4309. PubMed ID: 30887188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Group 2 ITI Consensus Report: Prosthodontics and implant dentistry.
Morton D; Gallucci G; Lin WS; Pjetursson B; Polido W; Roehling S; Sailer I; Aghaloo T; Albera H; Bohner L; Braut V; Buser D; Chen S; Dawson A; Eckert S; Gahlert M; Hamilton A; Jaffin R; Jarry C; Karayazgan B; Laine J; Martin W; Rahman L; Schlegel A; Shiota M; Stilwell C; Vorster C; Zembic A; Zhou W
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Oct; 29 Suppl 16():215-223. PubMed ID: 30328196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical outcomes of all-ceramic single crowns and fixed dental prostheses supported by ceramic implants: A systematic review and meta-analyses.
Spitznagel FA; Balmer M; Wiedemeier DB; Jung RE; Gierthmuehlen PC
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2022 Jan; 33(1):1-20. PubMed ID: 34665900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of zirconia-ceramic and metal-ceramic multiple-unit fixed dental prostheses.
Sailer I; Strasding M; Valente NA; Zwahlen M; Liu S; Pjetursson BE
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Oct; 29 Suppl 16():184-198. PubMed ID: 30328185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Screw-retained ceramic-veneered/monolithic zirconia partial implant-supported fixed dental prostheses: A 5 to 10-year retrospective study on survival and complications.
Zhang Y; Luo J; Di P; Chen B; Li J; Yu Z; Lin Y
J Prosthodont; 2024 Mar; 33(3):221-230. PubMed ID: 37302066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fracture rate of 188695 lithium disilicate and zirconia ceramic restorations after up to 7.5 years of clinical service: A dental laboratory survey.
Sulaiman TA; Abdulmajeed AA; Delgado A; Donovan TE
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jun; 123(6):807-810. PubMed ID: 31703926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. All-ceramic, bi-layered crowns supported by zirconia implants: Three-year results of a prospective multicenter study.
Spies BC; Balmer M; Jung RE; Sailer I; Vach K; Kohal RJ
J Dent; 2017 Dec; 67():58-65. PubMed ID: 28939484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Monolithic Lithium Disilicate Full-Contour Crowns Bonded on CAD/CAM Zirconia Complete-Arch Implant Bridges With 3 to 5 Years of Follow-Up.
Pozzi A; Tallarico M; Barlattani A
J Oral Implantol; 2015 Aug; 41(4):450-8. PubMed ID: 24188105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. EAO Position Paper: Material Selection for Implant-Supported Restorations.
Pjetursson BE; Fehmer V; Sailer I
Int J Prosthodont; 2022; 35(1):7-16. PubMed ID: 35230351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fracture resistance of single-tooth implant-supported zirconia-based indirect composite-layered molar restorations.
Taguchi K; Komine F; Fushiki R; Blatz MB; Kamio S; Matsumura H
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Aug; 25(8):983-91. PubMed ID: 23730807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical outcomes of implant-supported monolithic zirconia crowns and fixed partial dentures: A systematic review.
Kim W; Li XC; Bidra AS
J Prosthodont; 2023 Feb; 32(2):102-107. PubMed ID: 35929416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
