These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

327 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31501022)

  • 1. Differences in running biomechanics between a maximal, traditional, and minimal running shoe.
    Hannigan JJ; Pollard CD
    J Sci Med Sport; 2020 Jan; 23(1):15-19. PubMed ID: 31501022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A 6-Week Transition to Maximal Running Shoes Does Not Change Running Biomechanics.
    Hannigan JJ; Pollard CD
    Am J Sports Med; 2019 Mar; 47(4):968-973. PubMed ID: 30870034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of Maximal Running Shoes on Biomechanics Before and After a 5K Run.
    Pollard CD; Ter Har JA; Hannigan JJ; Norcross MF
    Orthop J Sports Med; 2018 Jun; 6(6):2325967118775720. PubMed ID: 29900183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Increased vertical impact forces and altered running mechanics with softer midsole shoes.
    Baltich J; Maurer C; Nigg BM
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(4):e0125196. PubMed ID: 25897963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of anti-pronation shoes on lower limb kinematics and kinetics in female runners with pronated feet: The role of physical fatigue.
    Jafarnezhadgero A; Alavi-Mehr SM; Granacher U
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(5):e0216818. PubMed ID: 31086402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biomechanical analysis of two runners who developed leg injuries during a six-week transition to maximal running shoes: A case series.
    Hannigan JJ; Pollard CD
    J Sports Sci; 2021 Oct; 39(20):2305-2311. PubMed ID: 34074228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Association Between Rearfoot Motion While Barefoot and Shod in Different Types of Running Shoes in Recreational Runners.
    Silva ÉQ; Miana AN; Ferreira JSSP; Kiyomoto HD; Dinato MCME; Sacco ICN
    J Sports Sci Med; 2020 Jun; 19(2):383-389. PubMed ID: 32390732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interaction of arch type and footwear on running mechanics.
    Butler RJ; Davis IS; Hamill J
    Am J Sports Med; 2006 Dec; 34(12):1998-2005. PubMed ID: 16902231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biomechanical variables and perception of comfort in running shoes with different cushioning technologies.
    Dinato RC; Ribeiro AP; Butugan MK; Pereira IL; Onodera AN; Sacco IC
    J Sci Med Sport; 2015 Jan; 18(1):93-7. PubMed ID: 24444754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Running in new and worn shoes: a comparison of three types of cushioning footwear.
    Kong PW; Candelaria NG; Smith DR
    Br J Sports Med; 2009 Oct; 43(10):745-9. PubMed ID: 18801775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Kinematic and kinetic comparison of running in standard and minimalist shoes.
    Willy RW; Davis IS
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2014 Feb; 46(2):318-23. PubMed ID: 23877378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparing walking biomechanics of older females in maximal, minimal, and traditional shoes.
    Hannigan JJ; Pollard CD
    Gait Posture; 2021 Jan; 83():245-249. PubMed ID: 33197860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Lower impact forces but greater burden for the musculoskeletal system in running shoes with greater cushioning stiffness.
    Malisoux L; Gette P; Backes A; Delattre N; Theisen D
    Eur J Sport Sci; 2023 Feb; 23(2):210-220. PubMed ID: 35014593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Midsole material-related force control during heel-toe running.
    Kersting UG; Brüggemann GP
    Res Sports Med; 2006; 14(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 16700401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Shoe Cushioning Influences the Running Injury Risk According to Body Mass: A Randomized Controlled Trial Involving 848 Recreational Runners.
    Malisoux L; Delattre N; Urhausen A; Theisen D
    Am J Sports Med; 2020 Feb; 48(2):473-480. PubMed ID: 31877062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The influence of cadence and shoes on patellofemoral joint kinetics in runners with patellofemoral pain.
    Bonacci J; Hall M; Fox A; Saunders N; Shipsides T; Vicenzino B
    J Sci Med Sport; 2018 Jun; 21(6):574-578. PubMed ID: 29054746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of footwear on high and low arched runners' mechanics during a prolonged run.
    Butler RJ; Hamill J; Davis I
    Gait Posture; 2007 Jul; 26(2):219-25. PubMed ID: 17055729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Kinetics and perception of basketball landing in various heights and footwear cushioning.
    Wei Q; Wang Z; Woo J; Liebenberg J; Park SK; Ryu J; Lam WK
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0201758. PubMed ID: 30092009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The influence of shoe aging on children running biomechanics.
    Herbaut A; Chavet P; Roux M; Guéguen N; Barbier F; Simoneau-Buessinger E
    Gait Posture; 2017 Jul; 56():123-128. PubMed ID: 28544949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Self-Reported Foot-Strike Patterns Among Runners in Traditional and Minimalist Shoes.
    Goss DL; Lewek M; Yu B; Ware WB; Teyhen DS; Gross MT
    J Athl Train; 2015 Jun; 50(6):603-11. PubMed ID: 26098391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.