BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

325 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31501022)

  • 1. Differences in running biomechanics between a maximal, traditional, and minimal running shoe.
    Hannigan JJ; Pollard CD
    J Sci Med Sport; 2020 Jan; 23(1):15-19. PubMed ID: 31501022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A 6-Week Transition to Maximal Running Shoes Does Not Change Running Biomechanics.
    Hannigan JJ; Pollard CD
    Am J Sports Med; 2019 Mar; 47(4):968-973. PubMed ID: 30870034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of Maximal Running Shoes on Biomechanics Before and After a 5K Run.
    Pollard CD; Ter Har JA; Hannigan JJ; Norcross MF
    Orthop J Sports Med; 2018 Jun; 6(6):2325967118775720. PubMed ID: 29900183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Increased vertical impact forces and altered running mechanics with softer midsole shoes.
    Baltich J; Maurer C; Nigg BM
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(4):e0125196. PubMed ID: 25897963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of anti-pronation shoes on lower limb kinematics and kinetics in female runners with pronated feet: The role of physical fatigue.
    Jafarnezhadgero A; Alavi-Mehr SM; Granacher U
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(5):e0216818. PubMed ID: 31086402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biomechanical analysis of two runners who developed leg injuries during a six-week transition to maximal running shoes: A case series.
    Hannigan JJ; Pollard CD
    J Sports Sci; 2021 Oct; 39(20):2305-2311. PubMed ID: 34074228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Association Between Rearfoot Motion While Barefoot and Shod in Different Types of Running Shoes in Recreational Runners.
    Silva ÉQ; Miana AN; Ferreira JSSP; Kiyomoto HD; Dinato MCME; Sacco ICN
    J Sports Sci Med; 2020 Jun; 19(2):383-389. PubMed ID: 32390732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interaction of arch type and footwear on running mechanics.
    Butler RJ; Davis IS; Hamill J
    Am J Sports Med; 2006 Dec; 34(12):1998-2005. PubMed ID: 16902231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biomechanical variables and perception of comfort in running shoes with different cushioning technologies.
    Dinato RC; Ribeiro AP; Butugan MK; Pereira IL; Onodera AN; Sacco IC
    J Sci Med Sport; 2015 Jan; 18(1):93-7. PubMed ID: 24444754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Running in new and worn shoes: a comparison of three types of cushioning footwear.
    Kong PW; Candelaria NG; Smith DR
    Br J Sports Med; 2009 Oct; 43(10):745-9. PubMed ID: 18801775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Kinematic and kinetic comparison of running in standard and minimalist shoes.
    Willy RW; Davis IS
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2014 Feb; 46(2):318-23. PubMed ID: 23877378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparing walking biomechanics of older females in maximal, minimal, and traditional shoes.
    Hannigan JJ; Pollard CD
    Gait Posture; 2021 Jan; 83():245-249. PubMed ID: 33197860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Lower impact forces but greater burden for the musculoskeletal system in running shoes with greater cushioning stiffness.
    Malisoux L; Gette P; Backes A; Delattre N; Theisen D
    Eur J Sport Sci; 2023 Feb; 23(2):210-220. PubMed ID: 35014593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Midsole material-related force control during heel-toe running.
    Kersting UG; Brüggemann GP
    Res Sports Med; 2006; 14(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 16700401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Shoe Cushioning Influences the Running Injury Risk According to Body Mass: A Randomized Controlled Trial Involving 848 Recreational Runners.
    Malisoux L; Delattre N; Urhausen A; Theisen D
    Am J Sports Med; 2020 Feb; 48(2):473-480. PubMed ID: 31877062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The influence of cadence and shoes on patellofemoral joint kinetics in runners with patellofemoral pain.
    Bonacci J; Hall M; Fox A; Saunders N; Shipsides T; Vicenzino B
    J Sci Med Sport; 2018 Jun; 21(6):574-578. PubMed ID: 29054746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of footwear on high and low arched runners' mechanics during a prolonged run.
    Butler RJ; Hamill J; Davis I
    Gait Posture; 2007 Jul; 26(2):219-25. PubMed ID: 17055729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Kinetics and perception of basketball landing in various heights and footwear cushioning.
    Wei Q; Wang Z; Woo J; Liebenberg J; Park SK; Ryu J; Lam WK
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0201758. PubMed ID: 30092009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The influence of shoe aging on children running biomechanics.
    Herbaut A; Chavet P; Roux M; Guéguen N; Barbier F; Simoneau-Buessinger E
    Gait Posture; 2017 Jul; 56():123-128. PubMed ID: 28544949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Self-Reported Foot-Strike Patterns Among Runners in Traditional and Minimalist Shoes.
    Goss DL; Lewek M; Yu B; Ware WB; Teyhen DS; Gross MT
    J Athl Train; 2015 Jun; 50(6):603-11. PubMed ID: 26098391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.