211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31501801)
1. Validation of a smartphone-based, computer-assisted sperm analysis system compared with laboratory-based manual microscopic semen analysis and computer-assisted semen analysis.
Cheon WH; Park HJ; Park MJ; Lim MY; Park JH; Kang BJ; Park NC
Investig Clin Urol; 2019 Sep; 60(5):380-387. PubMed ID: 31501801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy comparison study of new smartphone-based semen analyzer versus laboratory sperm quality analyzer.
Park MJ; Lim MY; Park HJ; Park NC
Investig Clin Urol; 2021 Nov; 62(6):672-680. PubMed ID: 34729967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Manual vs. computer-assisted sperm analysis: can CASA replace manual assessment of human semen in clinical practice?
Talarczyk-Desole J; Berger A; Taszarek-Hauke G; Hauke J; Pawelczyk L; Jedrzejczak P
Ginekol Pol; 2017; 88(2):56-60. PubMed ID: 28326513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Novel device for male infertility screening with single-ball lens microscope and smartphone.
Kobori Y; Pfanner P; Prins GS; Niederberger C
Fertil Steril; 2016 Sep; 106(3):574-8. PubMed ID: 27336208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Manual versus computer-automated semen analysis.
Köse M; Sokmensuer LK; Demir A; Bozdag G; Gunalp S
Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol; 2014; 41(6):662-4. PubMed ID: 25551959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Computer-assisted sperm analysis (CASA): capabilities and potential developments.
Amann RP; Waberski D
Theriogenology; 2014 Jan; 81(1):5-17.e1-3. PubMed ID: 24274405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An automated smartphone-based diagnostic assay for point-of-care semen analysis.
Kanakasabapathy MK; Sadasivam M; Singh A; Preston C; Thirumalaraju P; Venkataraman M; Bormann CL; Draz MS; Petrozza JC; Shafiee H
Sci Transl Med; 2017 Mar; 9(382):. PubMed ID: 28330865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of the sperm motility analyzer system (SMAS) for the assessment of sperm quality in infertile men.
Akashi T; Watanabe A; Komiya A; Fuse H
Syst Biol Reprod Med; 2010 Dec; 56(6):473-7. PubMed ID: 20662592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of counting chamber type on CASA outcomes of equine semen analysis.
Hoogewijs MK; de Vliegher SP; Govaere JL; de Schauwer C; de Kruif A; van Soom A
Equine Vet J; 2012 Sep; 44(5):542-9. PubMed ID: 22150933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of different counting chambers using a computer-assisted semen analyzer.
Peng N; Zou X; Li L
Syst Biol Reprod Med; 2015; 61(5):307-13. PubMed ID: 26214093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of chamber type integrated with computer-assisted semen analysis (CASA) system on the results of boar semen evaluation.
Gączarzewicz D
Pol J Vet Sci; 2015; 18(4):817-24. PubMed ID: 26812825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. CASA in the medical laboratory: CASA in diagnostic andrology and assisted conception.
Tomlinson MJ; Naeem A
Reprod Fertil Dev; 2018 Jun; 30(6):850-859. PubMed ID: 29559071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of semen preparation on casa motility results in cryopreserved bull spermatozoa.
Contri A; Valorz C; Faustini M; Wegher L; Carluccio A
Theriogenology; 2010 Aug; 74(3):424-35. PubMed ID: 20451996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Comparison of four methods for sperm counting].
Hu YA; Lu JC; Lu NQ; Shao Y; Huang YF
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2006 Mar; 12(3):222-4, 227. PubMed ID: 16597036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Double-blind prospective study comparing two automated sperm analyzers versus manual semen assessment.
Lammers J; Splingart C; Barrière P; Jean M; Fréour T
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2014 Jan; 31(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 24242989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of a portable device for assessment of motility in stallion semen.
Buss T; Aurich J; Aurich C
Reprod Domest Anim; 2019 Mar; 54(3):514-519. PubMed ID: 30592335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validation of a novel computer-assisted sperm analysis (CASA) system using multitarget-tracking algorithms.
Tomlinson MJ; Pooley K; Simpson T; Newton T; Hopkisson J; Jayaprakasan K; Jayaprakasan R; Naeem A; Pridmore T
Fertil Steril; 2010 Apr; 93(6):1911-20. PubMed ID: 19200972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Validation of a smartphone-based device to measure concentration, motility, and morphology in swine ejaculates.
Suárez-Trujillo A; Kandula H; Kumar J; Devi A; Shirley L; Thirumalaraju P; Kanakasabapathy MK; Shafiee H; Hart L
Transl Anim Sci; 2022 Oct; 6(4):txac119. PubMed ID: 36263416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Usefulness of sperm quality analyzer-V (SQA-V) for the assessment of sperm quality in infertile men.
Akashi T; Mizuno I; Okumura A; Fuse H
Arch Androl; 2005; 51(6):437-42. PubMed ID: 16214729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Computer-assisted semen analysis in large falcons (Falco spp.) and comparison to results of conventional semen analysis.
Fischer D; Schneider H; Meinecke-Tillmann S; Wehrend A; Lierz MW
Tierarztl Prax Ausg K Kleintiere Heimtiere; 2023 Apr; 51(2):95-106. PubMed ID: 37230113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
