These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31501801)

  • 21. Computer-aided sperm analysis, the new key player in routine sperm assessment.
    Schubert B; Badiou M; Force A
    Andrologia; 2019 Nov; 51(10):e13417. PubMed ID: 31475742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Application of computer-assisted semen analysis to explain variations in pig fertility.
    Broekhuijse ML; Šoštarić E; Feitsma H; Gadella BM
    J Anim Sci; 2012 Mar; 90(3):779-89. PubMed ID: 22064743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A comparison of conventional and computer-assisted semen analysis (CRISMAS software) using samples from 166 young Danish men.
    Vested A; Ramlau-Hansen CH; Bonde JP; Thulstrup AM; Kristensen SL; Toft G
    Asian J Androl; 2011 May; 13(3):453-8. PubMed ID: 21516117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The future of computer-aided sperm analysis.
    Mortimer ST; van der Horst G; Mortimer D
    Asian J Androl; 2015; 17(4):545-53. PubMed ID: 25926614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Manual versus computer-automated semen analyses. Part II. Determination of the working range of a computer-automated semen analyzer.
    Johnson JE; Boone WR; Blackhurst DW
    Fertil Steril; 1996 Jan; 65(1):156-9. PubMed ID: 8557133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Performance evaluation of sperm concentration, motility, and morphological analysis for GSA-810 series of sperm quality analysis system.
    Ge YM; Lu JC; Tang SS; Xu YH; Liang YJ
    J Clin Lab Anal; 2023 Dec; 37(23-24):e24986. PubMed ID: 38009489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Semen analysis of DNA fluorescence detection and two other routine analyzing methods].
    Jin W; Chen S; Li H
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2004 Jul; 10(7):512-4. PubMed ID: 15354522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of the semen analysis results obtained from two branded computer-aided sperm analysis systems.
    Hu YA; Lu JC; Shao Y; Huang YF; Lü NQ
    Andrologia; 2013 Oct; 45(5):315-8. PubMed ID: 22928934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Computer-assisted semen analysis parameters as predictors for fertility of men from the general population. The Danish First Pregnancy Planner Study Team.
    Larsen L; Scheike T; Jensen TK; Bonde JP; Ernst E; Hjollund NH; Zhou Y; Skakkebaek NE; Giwercman A
    Hum Reprod; 2000 Jul; 15(7):1562-7. PubMed ID: 10875866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of the Sperm Quality Analyzer IIC variables with the computer-aided sperm analysis estimates.
    Suzuki T; Shibahara H; Tsunoda H; Hirano Y; Taneichi A; Obara H; Takamizawa S; Sato I
    Int J Androl; 2002 Feb; 25(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 11869377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Assessment of sperm motility in livestock: Perspectives based on sperm swimming conditions in vivo.
    Waberski D; Suarez SS; Henning H
    Anim Reprod Sci; 2022 Nov; 246():106849. PubMed ID: 34556397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Use of combinations of in vitro quality assessments to predict fertility of bovine semen.
    Sellem E; Broekhuijse ML; Chevrier L; Camugli S; Schmitt E; Schibler L; Koenen EP
    Theriogenology; 2015 Dec; 84(9):1447-1454.e5. PubMed ID: 26296523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Comparison of the parameters obtained by sperm quality analyzer V and computer-aided sperm analysis system].
    Ge YF; Wang CH; Shao Y; Yao B; Wu D; Xia XY; Shang XJ; Huang YF
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2008 Oct; 14(10):923-6. PubMed ID: 19157106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluation of porcine semen quality by portable and desktop CASA systems - Short communication.
    Balogh E; Dálnoki AB; Rózsa L; Debnár VJ; Varga-Balogh O; Rátky J; Zsolnai A; Anton I
    Acta Vet Hung; 2020 Sep; 68(2):197-199. PubMed ID: 32894730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Implementing an open-access CASA software for the assessment of stallion sperm motility: Relationship with other sperm quality parameters.
    Giaretta E; Munerato M; Yeste M; Galeati G; Spinaci M; Tamanini C; Mari G; Bucci D
    Anim Reprod Sci; 2017 Jan; 176():11-19. PubMed ID: 27887759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Can the Sperm Class Analyser (SCA) CASA-Mot system for human sperm motility analysis reduce imprecision and operator subjectivity and improve semen analysis?
    Dearing C; Jayasena C; Lindsay K
    Hum Fertil (Camb); 2021 Jul; 24(3):208-218. PubMed ID: 31056980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effect of frame rate capture frequency on sperm kinematic parameters and subpopulation structure definition in boars, analysed with a CASA-Mot system.
    Valverde A; Madrigal M; Caldeira C; Bompart D; de Murga JN; Arnau S; Soler C
    Reprod Domest Anim; 2019 Feb; 54(2):167-175. PubMed ID: 30171651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Manual versus computer-automated semen analyses. Part I. Comparison of counting chambers.
    Johnson JE; Boone WR; Blackhurst DW
    Fertil Steril; 1996 Jan; 65(1):150-5. PubMed ID: 8557132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Standardization of computer-assisted semen analysis using an e-learning application.
    Ehlers J; Behr M; Bollwein H; Beyerbach M; Waberski D
    Theriogenology; 2011 Aug; 76(3):448-54. PubMed ID: 21529919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Computerized semen analysis (CASA): effect of semen concentration and chamber depth on measurements.
    Spiropoulos J
    Arch Androl; 2001; 46(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 11204615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.