These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31501916)

  • 1. [Pitfalls in the statistical world].
    Kiese-Himmel C; Plontke SK
    HNO; 2020 Jan; 68(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 31501916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Detecting and avoiding likely false-positive findings - a practical guide.
    Forstmeier W; Wagenmakers EJ; Parker TH
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2017 Nov; 92(4):1941-1968. PubMed ID: 27879038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Preregistration in practice: A comparison of preregistered and non-preregistered studies in psychology.
    van den Akker OR; van Assen MALM; Bakker M; Elsherif M; Wong TK; Wicherts JM
    Behav Res Methods; 2023 Nov; ():. PubMed ID: 37950113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. HARKing, Cherry-Picking, P-Hacking, Fishing Expeditions, and Data Dredging and Mining as Questionable Research Practices.
    Andrade C
    J Clin Psychiatry; 2021 Feb; 82(1):. PubMed ID: 33999541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Are questionable research practices facilitating new discoveries in sport and exercise medicine? The proportion of supported hypotheses is implausibly high.
    Büttner F; Toomey E; McClean S; Roe M; Delahunt E
    Br J Sports Med; 2020 Nov; 54(22):1365-1371. PubMed ID: 32699001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. What do participants think of our research practices? An examination of behavioural psychology participants' preferences.
    Bottesini JG; Rhemtulla M; Vazire S
    R Soc Open Sci; 2022 Apr; 9(4):200048. PubMed ID: 35425627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Questionable research practices may have little effect on replicability.
    Ulrich R; Miller J
    Elife; 2020 Sep; 9():. PubMed ID: 32930092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Top ten errors of statistical analysis in observational studies for cancer research.
    Carmona-Bayonas A; Jimenez-Fonseca P; Fernández-Somoano A; Álvarez-Manceñido F; Castañón E; Custodio A; de la Peña FA; Payo RM; Valiente LP
    Clin Transl Oncol; 2018 Aug; 20(8):954-965. PubMed ID: 29218627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How To Lie with Statistics and Figures.
    Parks J; Yeh DD
    Surg Infect (Larchmt); 2021 Aug; 22(6):611-619. PubMed ID: 34270365
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Weak Spots in Contemporary Science (and How to Fix Them).
    Wicherts JM
    Animals (Basel); 2017 Nov; 7(12):. PubMed ID: 29186879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Best research practices in psychology: Illustrating epistemological and pragmatic considerations with the case of relationship science.
    Finkel EJ; Eastwick PW; Reis HT
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2015 Feb; 108(2):275-97. PubMed ID: 25603376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Big little lies: a compendium and simulation of
    Stefan AM; Schönbrodt FD
    R Soc Open Sci; 2023 Feb; 10(2):220346. PubMed ID: 36778954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Avoiding practice-based research pitfalls: one novice's experience.
    Day TW
    Fam Pract Res J; 1994 Jun; 14(2):197-204. PubMed ID: 8053385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Improving the dependability of research in personality and social psychology: recommendations for research and educational practice.
    Funder DC; Levine JM; Mackie DM; Morf CC; Sansone C; Vazire S; West SG
    Pers Soc Psychol Rev; 2014 Feb; 18(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 24214149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Scientific rigour in psycho-oncology trials: why and how to avoid common statistical errors.
    Bell ML; Olivier J; King MT
    Psychooncology; 2013 Mar; 22(3):499-505. PubMed ID: 22315186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Simple solution to a common statistical problem: interpreting multiple tests.
    Gordi T; Khamis H
    Clin Ther; 2004 May; 26(5):780-6. PubMed ID: 15220022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Psychology's Renaissance.
    Nelson LD; Simmons J; Simonsohn U
    Annu Rev Psychol; 2018 Jan; 69():511-534. PubMed ID: 29068778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interpreting statistics in the urological literature.
    Scales CD; Peterson B; Dahm P
    J Urol; 2006 Nov; 176(5):1938-45. PubMed ID: 17070214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Frequent mistakes in the statistical inference of biomedical data.
    Martínez-Sellés M; Prieto L; Herranz I
    Ital Heart J; 2005 Feb; 6(2):90-5. PubMed ID: 15819501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Examples of pitfalls in statistical analysis--4: What is a type II error?].
    Nagata O
    Masui; 1996 Dec; 45(12):1473-9. PubMed ID: 8997049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.