These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31501916)

  • 21. The effect of preregistration on trust in empirical research findings: results of a registered report.
    Field SM; Wagenmakers EJ; Kiers HAL; Hoekstra R; Ernst AF; van Ravenzwaaij D
    R Soc Open Sci; 2020 Apr; 7(4):181351. PubMed ID: 32431853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The role of plausibility in the evaluation of scientific research.
    Almeida RM
    Rev Saude Publica; 2011 Jun; 45(3):617-20. PubMed ID: 21552759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. False-Positive Citations.
    Simmons JP; Nelson LD; Simonsohn U
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2018 Mar; 13(2):255-259. PubMed ID: 29592640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Critical reading of clinical trials].
    Aptel F; Cucherat M; Blumen-Ohana E; Denis P
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2011 Dec; 34(10):755-61. PubMed ID: 21992992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Avoiding and identifying errors in health technology assessment models: qualitative study and methodological review.
    Chilcott J; Tappenden P; Rawdin A; Johnson M; Kaltenthaler E; Paisley S; Papaioannou D; Shippam A
    Health Technol Assess; 2010 May; 14(25):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-107. PubMed ID: 20501062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Survival plots of time-to-event outcomes in clinical trials: good practice and pitfalls.
    Pocock SJ; Clayton TC; Altman DG
    Lancet; 2002 May; 359(9318):1686-9. PubMed ID: 12020548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Questionable research practices in ecology and evolution.
    Fraser H; Parker T; Nakagawa S; Barnett A; Fidler F
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(7):e0200303. PubMed ID: 30011289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Navigating the complexities of qualitative comparative analysis: case numbers, necessity relations, and model ambiguities.
    Thiem A
    Eval Rev; 2014 Dec; 38(6):487-513. PubMed ID: 25304518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Pitfalls and biases in the reporting and interpretation of the results of clinical trials.
    Parmar MK
    Lung Cancer; 1994 Mar; 10 Suppl 1():S143-50. PubMed ID: 8087503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Statistical primer: how to deal with missing data in scientific research?
    Papageorgiou G; Grant SW; Takkenberg JJM; Mokhles MM
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2018 Aug; 27(2):153-158. PubMed ID: 29757374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Examples of pitfalls in statistical analysis--5: Analysis of a multiple factor model].
    Nagata O
    Masui; 1997 Jan; 46(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 9028083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Common pitfalls and mistakes in the set-up, analysis and interpretation of results in network meta-analysis: what clinicians should look for in a published article.
    Chaimani A; Salanti G; Leucht S; Geddes JR; Cipriani A
    Evid Based Ment Health; 2017 Aug; 20(3):88-94. PubMed ID: 28739577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Clinical interpretation of statistical significance].
    López-Jiménez F
    Rev Invest Clin; 1996; 48(3):231-8. PubMed ID: 8966384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Degrees of Freedom in Planning, Running, Analyzing, and Reporting Psychological Studies: A Checklist to Avoid
    Wicherts JM; Veldkamp CL; Augusteijn HE; Bakker M; van Aert RC; van Assen MA
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():1832. PubMed ID: 27933012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Mastered with statistics: perfect eye drops and ideal screening test : Possibilities and limits of statistical methods for glaucoma].
    Kotliar KE; Lanzl IM
    Ophthalmologe; 2016 Oct; 113(10):838-843. PubMed ID: 27380326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Research practices that can prevent an inflation of false-positive rates.
    Murayama K; Pekrun R; Fiedler K
    Pers Soc Psychol Rev; 2014 May; 18(2):107-18. PubMed ID: 23965303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Intentional and Non-Intentional Distortion of Research Findings].
    Kamińska D; Kusztal M
    Polim Med; 2015; 45(1):7-9. PubMed ID: 26630723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Reanalyzing Head et al. (2015): investigating the robustness of widespread
    Hartgerink CH
    PeerJ; 2017; 5():e3068. PubMed ID: 28265523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Independence and statistical inference in clinical trial designs: a tutorial review.
    Bolton S
    J Clin Pharmacol; 1998 May; 38(5):408-12. PubMed ID: 9602951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The Long Way From α-Error Control to Validity Proper: Problems With a Short-Sighted False-Positive Debate.
    Fiedler K; Kutzner F; Krueger JI
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2012 Nov; 7(6):661-9. PubMed ID: 26168128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.