BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31502277)

  • 1. Kinematic characteristics of second-order motor planning and performance in 6- and 10-year-old children and adults: Effects of age and task constraints.
    Domellöf E; Bäckström A; Johansson AM; Rönnqvist L; von Hofsten C; Rosander K
    Dev Psychobiol; 2020 Mar; 62(2):250-265. PubMed ID: 31502277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of grasping habits and object orientation on motor planning in children and adults.
    Jovanovic B; Schwarzer G
    Dev Psychobiol; 2017 Dec; 59(8):949-957. PubMed ID: 29071707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influences of grasp selection in typically developing children.
    Wilmut K; Byrne M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 May; 148():181-7. PubMed ID: 24594384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Development of motor planning in children: Disentangling elements of the planning process.
    Krajenbrink H; Lust J; Wilson P; Steenbergen B
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2020 Nov; 199():104945. PubMed ID: 32750601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The development of the grasp height effect as a measure of efficient action planning in children.
    Jovanovic B; Schwarzer G
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2017 Jan; 153():74-82. PubMed ID: 27701010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How the mode of action affects evidence of planning and movement kinematics in aging: End-state comfort in older adults.
    Scharoun SM; Gonzalez DA; Roy EA; Bryden PJ
    Dev Psychobiol; 2016 May; 58(4):439-49. PubMed ID: 26617081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Motor planning and movement execution during goal-directed sequential manual movements in 6-year-old children with autism spectrum disorder: A kinematic analysis.
    Bäckström A; Johansson AM; Rudolfsson T; Rönnqvist L; von Hofsten C; Rosander K; Domellöf E
    Res Dev Disabil; 2021 Aug; 115():104014. PubMed ID: 34174471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Typical and atypical (cerebral palsy) development of unimanual and bimanual grasp planning.
    Janssen L; Steenbergen B
    Res Dev Disabil; 2011; 32(3):963-71. PubMed ID: 21353463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Perceptuo-motor planning during functional reaching after stroke.
    Alt Murphy M; Baniña MC; Levin MF
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Nov; 235(11):3295-3306. PubMed ID: 28803362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Preschool children adapt grasping movements to upcoming object manipulations: Evidence from a dial rotation task.
    Herbort O; Büschelberger J; Janczyk M
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2018 Mar; 167():62-77. PubMed ID: 29154031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. To throw or to place: does onward intention affect how a child reaches for an object?
    Wilmut K; Byrne M; Barnett AL
    Exp Brain Res; 2013 May; 226(3):421-9. PubMed ID: 23455727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Representation of grasp postures and anticipatory motor planning in children.
    Stöckel T; Hughes CM; Schack T
    Psychol Res; 2012 Nov; 76(6):768-76. PubMed ID: 22075763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Second-order motor planning in children: insights from a cup-manipulation-task.
    Wunsch K; Weiss DJ; Schack T; Weigelt M
    Psychol Res; 2015 Jul; 79(4):669-77. PubMed ID: 25030813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of multiple planning constraints on the development of grasp posture planning in 6- to 10-year-old children.
    Stöckel T; Hughes CM
    Dev Psychol; 2015 Sep; 51(9):1254-61. PubMed ID: 26192045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The development of end-state comfort planning in preschool children.
    Weigelt M; Schack T
    Exp Psychol; 2010; 57(6):476-782. PubMed ID: 20371425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Constraints on motor planning across the life span: Physical, cognitive, and motor factors.
    Wang S; Williams J; Wilmut K
    Psychol Aging; 2020 May; 35(3):421-433. PubMed ID: 31613135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A test of motor (not executive) planning in developmental coordination disorder and autism.
    van Swieten LM; van Bergen E; Williams JH; Wilson AD; Plumb MS; Kent SW; Mon-Williams MA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Apr; 36(2):493-9. PubMed ID: 20364932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The development of tool use: Planning for end-state comfort.
    Comalli DM; Keen R; Abraham ES; Foo VJ; Lee MH; Adolph KE
    Dev Psychol; 2016 Nov; 52(11):1878-1892. PubMed ID: 27786531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prefrontal engagement during sequential manual actions in children at early adolescence compared with adults.
    Domellöf E; Säfström D
    Neuroimage; 2020 May; 211():116623. PubMed ID: 32057999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Learning to grasp efficiently: the development of motor planning and the role of observational learning.
    Jovanovic B; Schwarzer G
    Vision Res; 2011 Apr; 51(8):945-54. PubMed ID: 21167856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.