These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31502481)

  • 1. Quantitative assessment of three vendor's metal artifact reduction techniques for CT imaging using a customized phantom.
    Chou R; Li JH; Ying LK; Lin CH; Leung W
    Comput Assist Surg (Abingdon); 2019 Oct; 24(sup2):34-42. PubMed ID: 31502481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Metal artifact reduction in CT, a phantom study: subjective and objective evaluation of four commercial metal artifact reduction algorithms when used on three different orthopedic metal implants.
    Bolstad K; Flatabø S; Aadnevik D; Dalehaug I; Vetti N
    Acta Radiol; 2018 Sep; 59(9):1110-1118. PubMed ID: 29310445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The application of metal artifact reduction (MAR) in CT scans for radiation oncology by monoenergetic extrapolation with a DECT scanner.
    Schwahofer A; Bär E; Kuchenbecker S; Grossmann JG; Kachelrieß M; Sterzing F
    Z Med Phys; 2015 Dec; 25(4):314-325. PubMed ID: 26144602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of quantitative measurements of four manufacturer's metal artifact reduction techniques for CT imaging with a self-made acrylic phantom.
    Chou R; Chi HY; Lin YH; Ying LK; Chao YJ; Lin CH
    Technol Health Care; 2020; 28(S1):273-287. PubMed ID: 32364160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Metal implants on CT: comparison of iterative reconstruction algorithms for reduction of metal artifacts with single energy and spectral CT scanning in a phantom model.
    Fang J; Zhang D; Wilcox C; Heidinger B; Raptopoulos V; Brook A; Brook OR
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 Mar; 42(3):742-748. PubMed ID: 28044188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dosimetric impact of commercial CT metal artifact reduction algorithms and a novel in-house algorithm for proton therapy of head and neck cancer.
    Branco D; Kry S; Taylor P; Zhang X; Rong J; Frank S; Followill D
    Med Phys; 2021 Jan; 48(1):445-455. PubMed ID: 33176003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Metal Artifact Reduction in Pelvic Computed Tomography With Hip Prostheses: Comparison of Virtual Monoenergetic Extrapolations From Dual-Energy Computed Tomography and an Iterative Metal Artifact Reduction Algorithm in a Phantom Study.
    Higashigaito K; Angst F; Runge VM; Alkadhi H; Donati OF
    Invest Radiol; 2015 Dec; 50(12):828-34. PubMed ID: 26171565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quantifying near metal visibility using dual energy computed tomography and iterative metal artifact reduction in a fracture phantom.
    Hakvoort ET; Wellenberg RHH; Streekstra GJ
    Phys Med; 2020 Jan; 69():9-18. PubMed ID: 31812728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improving CT-Based PET Attenuation Correction in the Vicinity of Metal Implants by an Iterative Metal Artifact Reduction Algorithm of CT Data and Its Comparison to Dual-Energy-Based Strategies: A Phantom Study.
    Schabel C; Gatidis S; Bongers M; Hüttig F; Bier G; Kupferschlaeger J; Bamberg F; la Fougère C; Nikolaou K; Pfannenberg C
    Invest Radiol; 2017 Jan; 52(1):61-65. PubMed ID: 27416330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of Metal Artifact Reduction in Dual- and Single-Source CT: A Vertebral Phantom Study.
    Jagoda P; Schmitz D; Wagenpfeil S; Bücker A; Minko P
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Dec; 211(6):1298-1305. PubMed ID: 30299998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Analysis of metal artifact reduction tools for dental hardware in CT scans of the oral cavity: kVp, iterative reconstruction, dual-energy CT, metal artifact reduction software: does it make a difference?
    De Crop A; Casselman J; Van Hoof T; Dierens M; Vereecke E; Bossu N; Pamplona J; D'Herde K; Thierens H; Bacher K
    Neuroradiology; 2015 Aug; 57(8):841-9. PubMed ID: 25929982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Technical Note: Evaluation of a 160-mm/256-row CT scanner for whole-heart quantitative myocardial perfusion imaging.
    So A; Imai Y; Nett B; Jackson J; Nett L; Hsieh J; Wisenberg G; Teefy P; Yadegari A; Islam A; Lee TY
    Med Phys; 2016 Aug; 43(8):4821. PubMed ID: 27487900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Metallic artifacts caused by dental metal prostheses on PET images: a PET/CT phantom study using different PET/CT scanners.
    Shimamoto H; Kakimoto N; Fujino K; Hamada S; Shimosegawa E; Murakami S; Furukawa S; Hatazawa J
    Ann Nucl Med; 2009 Jul; 23(5):443-9. PubMed ID: 19399580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Approaches to reducing photon dose calculation errors near metal implants.
    Huang JY; Followill DS; Howell RM; Liu X; Mirkovic D; Stingo FC; Kry SF
    Med Phys; 2016 Sep; 43(9):5117. PubMed ID: 27587042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dose Reduction With Dedicated CT Metal Artifact Reduction Algorithm: CT Phantom Study.
    Subhas N; Pursyko CP; Polster JM; Obuchowski NA; Primak AN; Dong FF; Herts BR
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Mar; 210(3):593-600. PubMed ID: 29231758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Combined application of virtual monoenergetic high keV images and the orthopedic metal artifact reduction algorithm (O-MAR): effect on image quality.
    Park J; Kim SH; Han JK
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 Feb; 44(2):756-765. PubMed ID: 30135970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dual-layer spectral computerized tomography for metal artifact reduction: small versus large orthopedic devices.
    Kosmas C; Hojjati M; Young PC; Abedi A; Gholamrezanezhad A; Rajiah P
    Skeletal Radiol; 2019 Dec; 48(12):1981-1990. PubMed ID: 31154493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of different CT metal artifact reduction strategies for standard titanium and carbon-fiber reinforced polymer implants in sheep cadavers.
    Huber FA; Sprengel K; Müller L; Graf LC; Osterhoff G; Guggenberger R
    BMC Med Imaging; 2021 Feb; 21(1):29. PubMed ID: 33588781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of projection- and dual-energy-based methods for metal artifact reduction in CT using a phantom study.
    Long Z; Bruesewitz MR; DeLone DR; Morris JM; Amrami KK; Adkins MC; Glazebrook KN; Kofler JM; Leng S; McCollough CH; Fletcher JG; Halaweish AF; Yu L
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Jul; 19(4):252-260. PubMed ID: 29749048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Changes realized from extended bit-depth and metal artifact reduction in CT.
    Glide-Hurst C; Chen D; Zhong H; Chetty IJ
    Med Phys; 2013 Jun; 40(6):061711. PubMed ID: 23718590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.