144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31502900)
1. A systematic review and meta-analysis of digital noise reduction hearing aids in adults.
Lakshmi MSK; Rout A; O'Donoghue CR
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2021 Feb; 16(2):120-129. PubMed ID: 31502900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A critical review of hearing-aid single-microphone noise-reduction studies in adults and children.
Chong FY; Jenstad LM
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2018 Aug; 13(6):600-608. PubMed ID: 29072542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Effects of Signal to Noise Ratio, T60 , Wide-Dynamic Range Compression Speed, and Digital Noise Reduction in a Virtual Restaurant Setting.
Ellis GM; Crukley J; Souza PE
Ear Hear; 2024 May-Jun 01; 45(3):760-774. PubMed ID: 38254265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Use of a Deep Recurrent Neural Network to Reduce Wind Noise: Effects on Judged Speech Intelligibility and Sound Quality.
Keshavarzi M; Goehring T; Zakis J; Turner RE; Moore BCJ
Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518770964. PubMed ID: 29708061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Benefits of Bimodal Aiding on Extended Dimensions of Speech Perception: Intelligibility, Listening Effort, and Sound Quality.
Devocht EMJ; Janssen AML; Chalupper J; Stokroos RJ; George ELJ
Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517727900. PubMed ID: 28874096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Effects of Nonlinear Frequency Compression and Digital Noise Reduction on Word Recognition and Satisfaction Ratings in Noise in Adult Hearing Aid Users.
Plyler PN; Tardy B; Hedrick M
J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Feb; 30(2):103-114. PubMed ID: 30461384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Modulation-based digital noise reduction for application to hearing protectors to reduce noise and maintain intelligibility.
Chung K; Tufts J; Nelson L
Hum Factors; 2009 Feb; 51(1):78-89. PubMed ID: 19634311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of Hearing Impairment and Hearing Aid Amplification on Listening Effort: A Systematic Review.
Ohlenforst B; Zekveld AA; Jansma EP; Wang Y; Naylor G; Lorens A; Lunner T; Kramer SE
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(3):267-281. PubMed ID: 28234670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of Adaptive Noise Management Technologies for School-Age Children with Hearing Loss.
Wolfe J; Duke M; Schafer E; Jones C; Rakita L
J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 May; 28(5):415-435. PubMed ID: 28534732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Investigation of Extended Bandwidth Hearing Aid Amplification on Speech Intelligibility and Sound Quality in Adults with Mild-to-Moderate Hearing Loss.
Seeto A; Searchfield GD
J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Mar; 29(3):243-254. PubMed ID: 29488874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Speech Intelligibility as a Cue for Acceptable Noise Levels.
Recker KL; Micheyl C
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(4):465-474. PubMed ID: 28169839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sound quality measures for speech in noise through a commercial hearing aid implementing digital noise reduction.
Ricketts TA; Hornsby BW
J Am Acad Audiol; 2005 May; 16(5):270-7. PubMed ID: 16119254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the effectiveness of alternative listening devices to conventional hearing aids in adults with hearing loss.
Maidment DW; Barker AB; Xia J; Ferguson MA
Int J Audiol; 2018 Oct; 57(10):721-729. PubMed ID: 30388942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Influence of Noise Reduction on Speech Intelligibility, Response Times to Speech, and Perceived Listening Effort in Normal-Hearing Listeners.
van den Tillaart-Haverkate M; de Ronde-Brons I; Dreschler WA; Houben R
Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517716844. PubMed ID: 28656807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Listening effort and perceived clarity for normal-hearing children with the use of digital noise reduction.
Gustafson S; McCreery R; Hoover B; Kopun JG; Stelmachowicz P
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(2):183-94. PubMed ID: 24473240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effects of hearing aid use on listening effort and mental fatigue associated with sustained speech processing demands.
Hornsby BW
Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):523-34. PubMed ID: 23426091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparing Binaural Pre-processing Strategies III: Speech Intelligibility of Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners.
Völker C; Warzybok A; Ernst SM
Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of transient noise reduction algorithms on speech intelligibility and ratings of hearing aid users.
DiGiovanni JJ; Davlin EA; Nagaraj NK
Am J Audiol; 2011 Dec; 20(2):140-50. PubMed ID: 21940982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An evidence-based systematic review of directional microphones and digital noise reduction hearing aids in school-age children with hearing loss.
McCreery RW; Venediktov RA; Coleman JJ; Leech HM
Am J Audiol; 2012 Dec; 21(2):295-312. PubMed ID: 22858614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of Additional Low-Pass-Filtered Speech on Listening Effort for Noise-Band-Vocoded Speech in Quiet and in Noise.
Pals C; Sarampalis A; van Dijk M; Başkent D
Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):3-17. PubMed ID: 29757801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
