142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31502900)
21. Semantic context improves speech intelligibility and reduces listening effort for listeners with hearing impairment.
Holmes E; Folkeard P; Johnsrude IS; Scollie S
Int J Audiol; 2018 Jul; 57(7):483-492. PubMed ID: 29415585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Speech intelligibility benefits of hearing AIDS at various input levels.
Kuk F; Lau CC; Korhonen P; Crose B
J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Mar; 26(3):275-88. PubMed ID: 25751695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Evaluation of model-based versus non-parametric monaural noise-reduction approaches for hearing aids.
Harlander N; Rosenkranz T; Hohmann V
Int J Audiol; 2012 Aug; 51(8):627-39. PubMed ID: 22642311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Effect of slow-acting wide dynamic range compression on measures of intelligibility and ratings of speech quality in simulated-loss listeners.
Rosengard PS; Payton KL; Braida LD
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Jun; 48(3):702-14. PubMed ID: 16197282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Impact of SNR, masker type and noise reduction processing on sentence recognition performance and listening effort as indicated by the pupil dilation response.
Ohlenforst B; Wendt D; Kramer SE; Naylor G; Zekveld AA; Lunner T
Hear Res; 2018 Aug; 365():90-99. PubMed ID: 29779607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparing Binaural Pre-processing Strategies I: Instrumental Evaluation.
Baumgärtel RM; Krawczyk-Becker M; Marquardt D; Völker C; Hu H; Herzke T; Coleman G; Adiloğlu K; Ernst SM; Gerkmann T; Doclo S; Kollmeier B; Hohmann V; Dietz M
Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Transitioning hearing aid users with severe and profound loss to a new gain/frequency response: benefit, perception, and acceptance.
Convery E; Keidser G
J Am Acad Audiol; 2011 Mar; 22(3):168-80. PubMed ID: 21545769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Effects of directional sound processing and listener's motivation on EEG responses to continuous noisy speech: Do normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners differ?
Mirkovic B; Debener S; Schmidt J; Jaeger M; Neher T
Hear Res; 2019 Jun; 377():260-270. PubMed ID: 31003037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Evaluation of the sparse coding shrinkage noise reduction algorithm in normal hearing and hearing impaired listeners.
Sang J; Hu H; Zheng C; Li G; Lutman ME; Bleeck S
Hear Res; 2014 Apr; 310():36-47. PubMed ID: 24495441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Children's performance in complex listening conditions: effects of hearing loss and digital noise reduction.
Pittman A
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Aug; 54(4):1224-39. PubMed ID: 21330646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Effects of a transient noise reduction algorithm on speech understanding, subjective preference, and preferred gain.
Korhonen P; Kuk F; Lau C; Keenan D; Schumacher J; Nielsen J
J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Oct; 24(9):845-58. PubMed ID: 24224991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Effect of temporal fine structure on speech intelligibility modeling.
Chen F; Guan T; Wong LL
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():4199-202. PubMed ID: 24110658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of single-microphone noise reduction schemes: can hearing impaired listeners tell the difference?
Huber R; Bisitz T; Gerkmann T; Kiessling J; Meister H; Kollmeier B
Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S55-S61. PubMed ID: 28112001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Effect of maximum power output and noise reduction on speech recognition in noise.
Kuk F; Peeters H; Lau C; Korhonen P
J Am Acad Audiol; 2011 May; 22(5):265-73. PubMed ID: 21756842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Adaptive noise suppression for a dual-microphone hearing aid.
Wouters J; Berghe JV; Maj JB
Int J Audiol; 2002 Oct; 41(7):401-7. PubMed ID: 12403608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The effects of digital noise reduction on the acceptance of background noise.
Mueller HG; Weber J; Hornsby BW
Trends Amplif; 2006 Jun; 10(2):83-93. PubMed ID: 16959732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Real-time multiband dynamic compression and noise reduction for binaural hearing aids.
Kollmeier B; Peissig J; Hohmann V
J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993; 30(1):82-94. PubMed ID: 8263832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Sentence recognition in noise and perceived benefit of noise reduction on the receiver and transmitter sides of a BICROS hearing aid.
Oeding K; Valente M
J Am Acad Audiol; 2013; 24(10):980-91. PubMed ID: 24384083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Perceptual effects of noise reduction with respect to personal preference, speech intelligibility, and listening effort.
Brons I; Houben R; Dreschler WA
Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):29-41. PubMed ID: 22874643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Hearing aid fitting and fine-tuning based on estimated individual traits.
Völker C; Ernst SMA; Kollmeier B
Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S139-S145. PubMed ID: 27873543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
