These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31503906)

  • 1. Automatic feature selection in EUV scatterometry.
    Ansuinelli P; Coene WMJ; Urbach HP
    Appl Opt; 2019 Aug; 58(22):5916-5923. PubMed ID: 31503906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A maximum likelihood approach to the inverse problem of scatterometry.
    Henn MA; Gross H; Scholze F; Wurm M; Elster C; Bär M
    Opt Express; 2012 Jun; 20(12):12771-86. PubMed ID: 22714306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Inverse optical scatterometry using sketch-guided deep learning.
    Liu S; Chen X; Yang T; Zhang J; Liu S
    Opt Express; 2024 May; 32(11):20303-20315. PubMed ID: 38859144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Uncertainties in the reconstruction of nanostructures in EUV scatterometry and grazing incidence small-angle X-ray scattering.
    Herrero AF; Pflüger M; Puls J; Scholze F; Soltwisch V
    Opt Express; 2021 Oct; 29(22):35580-35591. PubMed ID: 34808989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Maximum contributed component regression for the inverse problem in optical scatterometry.
    Zhu H; Lee Y; Shan H; Zhang J
    Opt Express; 2017 Jul; 25(14):15956-15966. PubMed ID: 28789106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Phase retrieval of the full vectorial field applied to coherent Fourier scatterometry.
    Xu X; Konijnenberg AP; Pereira SF; Urbach HP
    Opt Express; 2017 Nov; 25(24):29574-29586. PubMed ID: 29220995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Scatterometry-based metrology with feature region signatures matching.
    Ku YS; Wang SC; Shyu DM; Smith N
    Opt Express; 2006 Sep; 14(19):8482-91. PubMed ID: 19529226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Improved measurement accuracy in optical scatterometry using correction-based library search.
    Chen X; Liu S; Zhang C; Jiang H
    Appl Opt; 2013 Sep; 52(27):6726-34. PubMed ID: 24085171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reconstruction of a complex profile shape by weighting basic characterization results for nanometrology.
    Godi Tchéré M; Robert S; Fawzi ZS; Bayard B
    Appl Opt; 2019 Aug; 58(22):6118-6125. PubMed ID: 31503938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improved grating reconstruction by determination of line roughness in extreme ultraviolet scatterometry.
    Henn MA; Heidenreich S; Gross H; Rathsfeld A; Scholze F; Bär M
    Opt Lett; 2012 Dec; 37(24):5229-31. PubMed ID: 23258061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mueller matrix imaging ellipsometry for nanostructure metrology.
    Liu S; Du W; Chen X; Jiang H; Zhang C
    Opt Express; 2015 Jun; 23(13):17316-29. PubMed ID: 26191741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Robust solution to the inverse problem in optical scatterometry.
    Zhu J; Liu S; Chen X; Zhang C; Jiang H
    Opt Express; 2014 Sep; 22(18):22031-42. PubMed ID: 25321577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Phase retrieval from speckle images.
    Rondeau X; Thiébaut E; Tallon M; Foy R
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2007 Oct; 24(10):3354-65. PubMed ID: 17912332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Error analysis in inverse scatterometry. I. Modeling.
    Al-Assaad RM; Byrne DM
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2007 Feb; 24(2):326-38. PubMed ID: 17206249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Recognition of diffraction-grating profile using a neural network classifier in optical scatterometry.
    Gereige I; Robert S; Thiria S; Badran F; Granet G; Rousseau JJ
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2008 Jul; 25(7):1661-7. PubMed ID: 18594623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Modeling of line roughness and its impact on the diffraction intensities and the reconstructed critical dimensions in scatterometry.
    Gross H; Henn MA; Heidenreich S; Rathsfeld A; Bär M
    Appl Opt; 2012 Oct; 51(30):7384-94. PubMed ID: 23089796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Feature Selection via Chaotic Antlion Optimization.
    Zawbaa HM; Emary E; Grosan C
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0150652. PubMed ID: 26963715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Optical singularity assisted method for accurate parameter detection of step-shaped nanostructure in coherent Fourier scatterometry.
    Dou X; Min C; Zhang Y; Pereira SF; Yuan X
    Opt Express; 2022 Aug; 30(16):29287-29294. PubMed ID: 36299106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Toward 2D and 3D imaging of magnetic nanoparticles using EPR measurements.
    Coene A; Crevecoeur G; Leliaert J; Dupré L
    Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 42(9):5007-14. PubMed ID: 26328951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Application of measurement configuration optimization for accurate metrology of sub-wavelength dimensions in multilayer gratings using optical scatterometry.
    Zhu J; Shi Y; Goddard LL; Liu S
    Appl Opt; 2016 Sep; 55(25):6844-9. PubMed ID: 27607258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.