149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31504104)
21. Blood-based epigenome-wide analyses of 19 common disease states: A longitudinal, population-based linked cohort study of 18,413 Scottish individuals.
Hillary RF; McCartney DL; Smith HM; Bernabeu E; Gadd DA; Chybowska AD; Cheng Y; Murphy L; Wrobel N; Campbell A; Walker RM; Hayward C; Evans KL; McIntosh AM; Marioni RE
PLoS Med; 2023 Jul; 20(7):e1004247. PubMed ID: 37410739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Recovery of information from multiple imputation: a simulation study.
Lee KJ; Carlin JB
Emerg Themes Epidemiol; 2012 Jun; 9(1):3. PubMed ID: 22695083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The use of complete-case and multiple imputation-based analyses in molecular epidemiology studies that assess interaction effects.
Desai M; Esserman DA; Gammon MD; Terry MB
Epidemiol Perspect Innov; 2011 Oct; 8(1):5. PubMed ID: 21978450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Longitudinal analysis strategies for modelling epigenetic trajectories.
Staley JR; Suderman M; Simpkin AJ; Gaunt TR; Heron J; Relton CL; Tilling K
Int J Epidemiol; 2018 Apr; 47(2):516-525. PubMed ID: 29462323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. EWAS: epigenome-wide association study software 2.0.
Xu J; Zhao L; Liu D; Hu S; Song X; Li J; Lv H; Duan L; Zhang M; Jiang Q; Liu G; Jin S; Liao M; Zhang M; Feng R; Kong F; Xu L; Jiang Y
Bioinformatics; 2018 Aug; 34(15):2657-2658. PubMed ID: 29566144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Epigenome-wide association study of incident type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of five prospective European cohorts.
Fraszczyk E; Spijkerman AMW; Zhang Y; Brandmaier S; Day FR; Zhou L; Wackers P; Dollé MET; Bloks VW; Gào X; Gieger C; Kooner J; Kriebel J; Picavet HSJ; Rathmann W; Schöttker B; Loh M; Verschuren WMM; van Vliet-Ostaptchouk JV; Wareham NJ; Chambers JC; Ong KK; Grallert H; Brenner H; Luijten M; Snieder H
Diabetologia; 2022 May; 65(5):763-776. PubMed ID: 35169870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Multiple imputation using linked proxy outcome data resulted in important bias reduction and efficiency gains: a simulation study.
Cornish RP; Macleod J; Carpenter JR; Tilling K
Emerg Themes Epidemiol; 2017; 14():14. PubMed ID: 29270206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Performance of Multiple Imputation Using Modern Machine Learning Methods in Electronic Health Records Data.
Getz K; Hubbard RA; Linn KA
Epidemiology; 2023 Mar; 34(2):206-215. PubMed ID: 36722803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Updates to data versions and analytic methods influence the reproducibility of results from epigenome-wide association studies.
Lussier AA; Zhu Y; Smith BJ; Simpkin AJ; Smith ADAC; Suderman MJ; Walton E; Ressler KJ; Dunn EC
Epigenetics; 2022 Nov; 17(11):1373-1388. PubMed ID: 35156895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of imputation methods for handling missing covariate data when fitting a Cox proportional hazards model: a resampling study.
Marshall A; Altman DG; Holder RL
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2010 Dec; 10():112. PubMed ID: 21194416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Cell Type-Specific Signal Analysis in Epigenome-Wide Association Studies.
Breeze CE
Methods Mol Biol; 2022; 2432():57-71. PubMed ID: 35505207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Linking Prenatal Environmental Exposures to Lifetime Health with Epigenome-Wide Association Studies: State-of-the-Science Review and Future Recommendations.
Bakulski KM; Blostein F; London SJ
Environ Health Perspect; 2023 Dec; 131(12):126001. PubMed ID: 38048101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Accounting for missing data in statistical analyses: multiple imputation is not always the answer.
Hughes RA; Heron J; Sterne JAC; Tilling K
Int J Epidemiol; 2019 Aug; 48(4):1294-1304. PubMed ID: 30879056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Bias and Precision of the "Multiple Imputation, Then Deletion" Method for Dealing With Missing Outcome Data.
Sullivan TR; Salter AB; Ryan P; Lee KJ
Am J Epidemiol; 2015 Sep; 182(6):528-34. PubMed ID: 26337075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Controlling bias and inflation in epigenome- and transcriptome-wide association studies using the empirical null distribution.
van Iterson M; van Zwet EW; ; Heijmans BT
Genome Biol; 2017 Jan; 18(1):19. PubMed ID: 28129774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Missing data strategies for time-varying confounders in comparative effectiveness studies of non-missing time-varying exposures and right-censored outcomes.
Desai M; Montez-Rath ME; Kapphahn K; Joyce VR; Mathur MB; Garcia A; Purington N; Owens DK
Stat Med; 2019 Jul; 38(17):3204-3220. PubMed ID: 31099433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Imputing missing covariates in time-to-event analysis within distributed research networks: A simulation study.
Li D; Wong J; Li X; Toh S; Wang R
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2023 Mar; 32(3):330-340. PubMed ID: 36380400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Epigenome-wide association studies in asthma: A systematic review.
Edris A; den Dekker HT; Melén E; Lahousse L
Clin Exp Allergy; 2019 Jul; 49(7):953-968. PubMed ID: 31009112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Handling of Missing Outcome Data in Acute Stroke Trials: Advantages of Multiple Imputation Using Baseline and Postbaseline Variables.
Young-Saver DF; Gornbein J; Starkman S; Saver JL
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis; 2018 Dec; 27(12):3662-3669. PubMed ID: 30297167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison of methods for handling covariate missingness in propensity score estimation with a binary exposure.
Coffman DL; Zhou J; Cai X
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Jun; 20(1):168. PubMed ID: 32586271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
