These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31504938)

  • 1. Accurate Inference of Tree Topologies from Multiple Sequence Alignments Using Deep Learning.
    Suvorov A; Hochuli J; Schrider DR
    Syst Biol; 2020 Mar; 69(2):221-233. PubMed ID: 31504938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Deep Residual Neural Networks Resolve Quartet Molecular Phylogenies.
    Zou Z; Zhang H; Guan Y; Zhang J
    Mol Biol Evol; 2020 May; 37(5):1495-1507. PubMed ID: 31868908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Re-evaluating Deep Neural Networks for Phylogeny Estimation: The Issue of Taxon Sampling.
    Zaharias P; Grosshauser M; Warnow T
    J Comput Biol; 2022 Jan; 29(1):74-89. PubMed ID: 34986031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Invariant transformers of Robinson and Foulds distance matrices for Convolutional Neural Network.
    Tahiri N; Veriga A; Koshkarov A; Morozov B
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2022 Aug; 20(4):2250012. PubMed ID: 35798684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. SATe-II: very fast and accurate simultaneous estimation of multiple sequence alignments and phylogenetic trees.
    Liu K; Warnow TJ; Holder MT; Nelesen SM; Yu J; Stamatakis AP; Linder CR
    Syst Biol; 2012 Jan; 61(1):90-106. PubMed ID: 22139466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Larger, unfiltered datasets are more effective at resolving phylogenetic conflict: Introns, exons, and UCEs resolve ambiguities in Golden-backed frogs (Anura: Ranidae; genus Hylarana).
    Chan KO; Hutter CR; Wood PL; Grismer LL; Brown RM
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2020 Oct; 151():106899. PubMed ID: 32590046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. What is the danger of the anomaly zone for empirical phylogenetics?
    Huang H; Knowles LL
    Syst Biol; 2009 Oct; 58(5):527-36. PubMed ID: 20525606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. PhyPA: Phylogenetic method with pairwise sequence alignment outperforms likelihood methods in phylogenetics involving highly diverged sequences.
    Xia X
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2016 Sep; 102():331-43. PubMed ID: 27377322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Maximum Likelihood Phylogenetic Inference is Consistent on Multiple Sequence Alignments, with or without Gaps.
    Truszkowski J; Goldman N
    Syst Biol; 2016 Mar; 65(2):328-33. PubMed ID: 26615177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Model Choice, Missing Data, and Taxon Sampling Impact Phylogenomic Inference of Deep Basidiomycota Relationships.
    Prasanna AN; Gerber D; Kijpornyongpan T; Aime MC; Doyle VP; Nagy LG
    Syst Biol; 2020 Jan; 69(1):17-37. PubMed ID: 31062852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. More on the Best Evolutionary Rate for Phylogenetic Analysis.
    Klopfstein S; Massingham T; Goldman N
    Syst Biol; 2017 Sep; 66(5):769-785. PubMed ID: 28595363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bayesian coestimation of phylogeny and sequence alignment.
    Lunter G; Miklós I; Drummond A; Jensen JL; Hein J
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Apr; 6():83. PubMed ID: 15804354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quartet-Based Computations of Internode Certainty Provide Robust Measures of Phylogenetic Incongruence.
    Zhou X; Lutteropp S; Czech L; Stamatakis A; Looz MV; Rokas A
    Syst Biol; 2020 Mar; 69(2):308-324. PubMed ID: 31504977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparing bootstrap and posterior probability values in the four-taxon case.
    Cummings MP; Handley SA; Myers DS; Reed DL; Rokas A; Winka K
    Syst Biol; 2003 Aug; 52(4):477-87. PubMed ID: 12857639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evidence of Statistical Inconsistency of Phylogenetic Methods in the Presence of Multiple Sequence Alignment Uncertainty.
    Md Mukarram Hossain AS; Blackburne BP; Shah A; Whelan S
    Genome Biol Evol; 2015 Jul; 7(8):2102-16. PubMed ID: 26139831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bayesian and maximum likelihood phylogenetic analyses of protein sequence data under relative branch-length differences and model violation.
    Mar JC; Harlow TJ; Ragan MA
    BMC Evol Biol; 2005 Jan; 5():8. PubMed ID: 15676079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Distinguishing Felsenstein Zone from Farris Zone Using Neural Networks.
    Leuchtenberger AF; Crotty SM; Drucks T; Schmidt HA; Burgstaller-Muehlbacher S; von Haeseler A
    Mol Biol Evol; 2020 Dec; 37(12):3632-3641. PubMed ID: 32637998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Using ESTs for phylogenomics: can one accurately infer a phylogenetic tree from a gappy alignment?
    Hartmann S; Vision TJ
    BMC Evol Biol; 2008 Mar; 8():95. PubMed ID: 18366758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. ModelRevelator: Fast phylogenetic model estimation via deep learning.
    Burgstaller-Muehlbacher S; Crotty SM; Schmidt HA; Reden F; Drucks T; von Haeseler A
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2023 Nov; 188():107905. PubMed ID: 37595933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Alignment and topological accuracy of the direct optimization approach via POY and traditional phylogenetics via ClustalW + PAUP*.
    Ogden TH; Rosenberg MS
    Syst Biol; 2007 Apr; 56(2):182-93. PubMed ID: 17454974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.