199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31505492)
1. Performance of Different Imaging Techniques for Detection of Para-Aortic Lymph Node Metastasis from Gynecological Malignancies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Gong Y; Guo Z; Tang X; Li C; Wang Q
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2020; 85(1):53-71. PubMed ID: 31505492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Different imaging techniques for the detection of pelvic lymph nodes metastasis from gynecological malignancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Gong Y; Wang Q; Dong L; Jia Y; Hua C; Mi F; Li C
Oncotarget; 2017 Feb; 8(8):14107-14125. PubMed ID: 27802186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnostic accuracy of F-18 FDG PET or PET/CT for detection of lymph node metastasis in clinically node negative head and neck cancer patients; A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Kim SJ; Pak K; Kim K
Am J Otolaryngol; 2019; 40(2):297-305. PubMed ID: 30473166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. PET-CT versus MRI in the diagnosis of lymph node metastasis of cervical cancer: A meta-analysis.
He T; Sun J; Wu J; Wang H; Liang C; Wang H; Li S; Su S
Microsc Res Tech; 2022 May; 85(5):1791-1798. PubMed ID: 34981608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A Comprehensive Comparison of CT, MRI, Positron Emission Tomography or Positron Emission Tomography/CT, and Diffusion Weighted Imaging-MRI for Detecting the Lymph Nodes Metastases in Patients with Cervical Cancer: A Meta-Analysis Based on 67 Studies.
Liu B; Gao S; Li S
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2017; 82(3):209-222. PubMed ID: 28183074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnostic accuracy of preoperative
Hu J; Zhang K; Yan Y; Zang Y; Wang Y; Xue F
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2019 Sep; 300(3):519-529. PubMed ID: 31165242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The diagnostic performance of PET/CT scans for the detection of para-aortic metastatic lymph nodes in patients with cervical cancer: A meta-analysis.
Yu W; Kou C; Bai W; Yu X; Duan R; Zhu B; Li Y; Hua W; Ren X; Yang Y
PLoS One; 2019; 14(7):e0220080. PubMed ID: 31318962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic value of PET/CT versus PET/MRI in gynecological malignancies of the pelvis: A meta-analysis.
Virarkar M; Ganeshan D; Devine C; Bassett R; Kuchana V; Bhosale P
Clin Imaging; 2020 Mar; 60(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 31864201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Direct comparison of choline PET/CT and MRI in the diagnosis of lymph node metastases in patients with prostate cancer.
Huang SM; Yin L; Yue JL; Li YF; Yang Y; Lin ZC
Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Dec; 97(50):e13344. PubMed ID: 30557983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnostic Accuracy of F-18 FDG PET/CT for Preoperative Lymph Node Staging in Newly Diagnosed Bladder Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Ha HK; Koo PJ; Kim SJ
Oncology; 2018; 95(1):31-38. PubMed ID: 29847834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diagnostic Performance of Radiolabeled Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography for Primary Lymph Node Staging in Newly Diagnosed Intermediate to High-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Kim SJ; Lee SW; Ha HK
Urol Int; 2019; 102(1):27-36. PubMed ID: 30269140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Different Imaging Modalities for the Diagnosis of Axillary Lymph Node Metastases in Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy.
Li Z; Gao Y; Gong H; Feng W; Ma Q; Li J; Lu X; Wang X; Lei J
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2023 May; 57(5):1392-1403. PubMed ID: 36054564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnostic accuracy of C-11 choline and C-11 acetate for lymph node staging in patients with bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Kim SJ; Koo PJ; Pak K; Kim IJ; Kim K
World J Urol; 2018 Mar; 36(3):331-340. PubMed ID: 29294164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative sensitivity and specificity of imaging modalities in staging bladder cancer prior to radical cystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Crozier J; Papa N; Perera M; Ngo B; Bolton D; Sengupta S; Lawrentschuk N
World J Urol; 2019 Apr; 37(4):667-690. PubMed ID: 30120501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnostic performance of computer tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography or positron emission tomography/computer tomography for detection of metastatic lymph nodes in patients with cervical cancer: meta-analysis.
Choi HJ; Ju W; Myung SK; Kim Y
Cancer Sci; 2010 Jun; 101(6):1471-9. PubMed ID: 20298252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Computer tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography or positron emission tomography/computer tomography for detection of metastatic lymph nodes in patients with ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis.
Yuan Y; Gu ZX; Tao XF; Liu SY
Eur J Radiol; 2012 May; 81(5):1002-6. PubMed ID: 21349672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Can quantitative parameters of spectral computed tomography predict lymphatic metastasis in lung cancer? a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Wang T; Fan Z; Zou L; Hou Y
Radiother Oncol; 2023 Jun; 183():109643. PubMed ID: 36990392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Upstaging by para-aortic lymph node dissection in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Thelissen AAB; Jürgenliemk-Schulz IM; van der Leij F; Peters M; Gerestein CG; Zweemer RP; van Rossum PSN
Gynecol Oncol; 2022 Mar; 164(3):667-674. PubMed ID: 34969533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diagnostic value of computed tomography (CT) and positron emission tomography (PET) for paraaortic lymph node metastasis from left-sided colon and rectal cancer.
Nakai N; Yamaguchi T; Kinugasa Y; Shiomi A; Kagawa H; Yamakawa Y; Numata M; Furutani A; Yamaoka Y; Manabe S; Sawada A
Asian J Surg; 2020 Jun; 43(6):676-682. PubMed ID: 31570183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Detection of lymph node metastases in head and neck cancer: a meta-analysis comparing US, USgFNAC, CT and MR imaging.
de Bondt RB; Nelemans PJ; Hofman PA; Casselman JW; Kremer B; van Engelshoven JM; Beets-Tan RG
Eur J Radiol; 2007 Nov; 64(2):266-72. PubMed ID: 17391885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
