These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31505974)

  • 21. A model to predict vaginal delivery in nulliparous women based on maternal characteristics and intrapartum ultrasound.
    Eggebø TM; Wilhelm-Benartzi C; Hassan WA; Usman S; Salvesen KA; Lees CC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Sep; 213(3):362.e1-6. PubMed ID: 26008180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Predictive value of head-perineum distance measured at the initiation of the active second stage of labor on the mode of delivery: A prospective cohort study.
    Boulmedais M; Monperrus M; Corbel E; Blanc-Petitjean P; Lassel L; Béranger R; Timoh KN; Enderle I; Le Lous M
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2023 Jan; 280():132-137. PubMed ID: 36463788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Ultrasonographic Evaluation of the Second Stage of Labor according to the Mode of Delivery: A Prospective Study in Greece.
    Mitta K; Tsakiridis I; Dagklis T; Kalogiannidis I; Mamopoulos A; Michos G; Virgiliou A; Athanasiadis A
    J Clin Med; 2024 Feb; 13(4):. PubMed ID: 38398380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Angle of Progression on Ultrasound in the Second Stage of Labor and Spontaneous Vaginal Delivery.
    Bibbo C; Rouse CE; Cantonwine DE; Little SE; McElrath TF; Robinson JN
    Am J Perinatol; 2018 Mar; 35(4):413-420. PubMed ID: 29112996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Intrapartum ultrasound use in clinical practice as a predictor of delivery mode during prolonged second stage of labor.
    Katzir T; Brezinov Y; Khairish E; Hadad S; Vaisbuch E; Levy R
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2023 Mar; 307(3):763-770. PubMed ID: 35576076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Utility of intrapartum transperineal ultrasound to predict cases of failure in vacuum extraction attempt and need of cesarean section to complete delivery.
    Sainz JA; Borrero C; Aquise A; Serrano R; Gutiérrez L; Fernández-Palacín A
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016; 29(8):1348-52. PubMed ID: 26037726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Intra and interobserver variability of intrapartum transperineal ultrasound measurements with contraction and pushing.
    Sainz JA; Fernández-Palacín A; Borrero C; Aquise A; Ramos Z; García-Mejido JA
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2018 Apr; 38(3):333-338. PubMed ID: 29022481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Transperineal ultrasound assessment of maternal pelvic floor at term and fetal head engagement.
    Youssef A; Brunelli E; Montaguti E; Di Donna G; Dodaro MG; Bianchini L; Pilu G
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Dec; 56(6):921-927. PubMed ID: 31975450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Sonographic measurement of cervical length and head perineum distance before labor to predict time of delivery.
    Chan YTV; Lau KW; Hui W; Lau CH; Leung WC; Lau WL
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Dec; 35(25):4905-4909. PubMed ID: 33455498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Head-to-perineum distance measured transperineally as a predictor of failed midcavity vacuum-assisted delivery.
    Nallet C; Ramirez Zegarra R; Mazellier S; Dall'asta A; Puyraveau M; Lallemant M; Ramanah R; Riethmuller D; Ghi T; Mottet N
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2023 Feb; 5(2):100827. PubMed ID: 36464238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Prediction of time to delivery by transperineal ultrasound in second stage of labor.
    Yonetani N; Yamamoto R; Murata M; Nakajima E; Taguchi T; Ishii K; Mitsuda N
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Feb; 49(2):246-251. PubMed ID: 27089836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Intrapartum translabial ultrasound with pushing used to predict the difficulty in vacuum-assisted delivery of fetuses in non-occiput posterior position.
    Antonio Sainz J; Borrero C; Aquise A; García-Mejido JA; Gutierrez L; Fernández-Palacín A
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016 Oct; 29(20):3400-5. PubMed ID: 26653174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Sonographic diagnosis of fetal head deflexion and the risk of cesarean delivery.
    Bellussi F; Livi A; Cataneo I; Salsi G; Lenzi J; Pilu G
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2020 Nov; 2(4):100217. PubMed ID: 33345926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The "occiput-spine angle": a new sonographic index of fetal head deflexion during the first stage of labor.
    Ghi T; Bellussi F; Azzarone C; Krsmanovic J; Franchi L; Youssef A; Lenzi J; Fantini MP; Frusca T; Pilu G
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Jul; 215(1):84.e1-7. PubMed ID: 26880733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Structured clinical examinations in labor: rekindling the craft of obstetrics.
    Iversen JK; Jacobsen AF; Mikkelsen TF; Eggebø TM
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2021 Jun; 34(12):1963-1969. PubMed ID: 31422727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Prediction of persistent occiput posterior position by sonographic assessment of fetal head attitude at start of second stage of labor: prospective study.
    Ramirez Zegarra R; Dall'Asta A; Di Pasquo E; Morganelli G; Falcone V; Lizarraga Cepeda E; Falvo G; Bontempo P; Kiener AJO; Fieni S; Ghi T
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Feb; 63(2):251-257. PubMed ID: 37610831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Intrapartum ultrasound and the choice between assisted vaginal and cesarean delivery.
    Chan VYT; Lau WL
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2021 Nov; 3(6S):100439. PubMed ID: 34216834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Transperineal ultrasound imaging in prolonged second stage of labor with occipitoanterior presenting fetuses: how well does the 'angle of progression' predict the mode of delivery?
    Kalache KD; Dückelmann AM; Michaelis SA; Lange J; Cichon G; Dudenhausen JW
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Mar; 33(3):326-30. PubMed ID: 19224527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Reliability of transperineal ultrasound for the assessment of the angle of progression in labor using parasagittal approach versus midsagittal approach.
    Kamel R; Negm S; Montaguti E; Dodaro MG; Brunelli E; Di Donna G; Soliman E; Sharaf MF; ElHarty AS; Youssef A
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2021 Oct; 34(19):3175-3180. PubMed ID: 31640437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Advanced midwifery practice: intrapartum ultrasonography to assess fetal head station and comparison with vaginal digital examination.
    Messina MP; Piccioni MG; Petrella C; Vitali M; Greco A; Ralli M; Ceccanti M; Ferraguti G; Neri I; Ricchi A; Fiore M; D'Angelo A
    Minerva Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Apr; 73(2):253-260. PubMed ID: 33851805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.