BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

409 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31506749)

  • 21. Minimally invasive surgical management of pelvic-ureteric junction obstruction: update on the current status of robotic-assisted pyeloplasty.
    Uberoi J; Disick GI; Munver R
    BJU Int; 2009 Dec; 104(11):1722-9. PubMed ID: 19519760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Learning curve of robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP) in children: how to reach a level of excellence?
    Dothan D; Raisin G; Jaber J; Kocherov S; Chertin B
    J Robot Surg; 2021 Feb; 15(1):93-97. PubMed ID: 32333364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of open, laparoscopic and robot-assisted pyeloplasty for pelviureteric junction obstruction in adult patients.
    Rasool S; Singh M; Jain S; Chaddha S; Tyagi V; Pahwa M; Pandey H
    J Robot Surg; 2020 Apr; 14(2):325-329. PubMed ID: 31222624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP), for ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO), is an alternative to open pyeloplasty in the pediatric population.
    Cohen S; Raisin G; Dothan D; Jaber J; Kocherov S; Chertin B
    J Robot Surg; 2022 Oct; 16(5):1117-1122. PubMed ID: 34859365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Pediatric robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP): does weight matter?
    Kafka IZ; Kocherov S; Jaber J; Chertin B
    Pediatr Surg Int; 2019 Mar; 35(3):391-396. PubMed ID: 30643964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Pediatric Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty: Where Are We Now?
    Abdulfattah S; Mittal S
    Curr Urol Rep; 2024 Mar; 25(3):55-61. PubMed ID: 38324220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty in Challenging Cases of Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction in the Pediatric Population: A Multicenter Review.
    Chertin L; Verhovsky G; Jaber J; Chertin B; Zisman A; Kocherov S; Neheman A
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2024 May; 34(5):443-447. PubMed ID: 38364182
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Laparoscopic versus robot-assisted pyeloplasty in infants and young children.
    Sun L; Zhao D; Shen Y; Tang D; Chen G; Zhu L; Yang Y; Tao C
    Asian J Surg; 2023 Feb; 46(2):868-873. PubMed ID: 36192267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Surgical outcomes are equivalent after pure laparoscopic and robotic-assisted pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
    Ebert KM; Nicassio L; Alpert SA; Ching CB; Dajusta DG; Fuchs ME; McLeod DJ; Jayanthi VR
    J Pediatr Urol; 2020 Dec; 16(6):845.e1-845.e6. PubMed ID: 33060019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Laparoscopy versus robotic-assisted pyeloplasty in children: preliminary results of a pilot prospective randomized controlled trial.
    Silay MS; Danacioglu O; Ozel K; Karaman MI; Caskurlu T
    World J Urol; 2020 Aug; 38(8):1841-1848. PubMed ID: 31435732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Reoperative robotic pyeloplasty in children.
    Davis TD; Burns AS; Corbett ST; Peters CA
    J Pediatr Urol; 2016 Dec; 12(6):394.e1-394.e7. PubMed ID: 27423387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Has the robot caught up? National trends in utilization, perioperative outcomes, and cost for open, laparoscopic, and robotic pediatric pyeloplasty in the United States from 2003 to 2015.
    Varda BK; Wang Y; Chung BI; Lee RS; Kurtz MP; Nelson CP; Chang SL
    J Pediatr Urol; 2018 Aug; 14(4):336.e1-336.e8. PubMed ID: 29530407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Transition from open to robotic-assisted pediatric pyeloplasty: a feasibility and outcome study.
    O'Brien ST; Shukla AR
    J Pediatr Urol; 2012 Jun; 8(3):276-81. PubMed ID: 21616719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Robotic computer-assisted pyeloplasty versus conventional laparoscopic pyeloplasty.
    Weise ES; Winfield HN
    J Endourol; 2006 Oct; 20(10):813-9. PubMed ID: 17094760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Modified Laparoscopic and Robotic Flap Pyeloplasty for Recurrent Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction with a Long Proximal Ureteral Stricture: The "Wishbone" Anastomosis and the "Ureteral Plate" Technique.
    Cheng S; Li X; Yang K; Xiong S; Li Z; Zhu H; Zhang P; Li X; Guan H; Li Z; Hao H; Zhang L; Li X; Zhou L
    Urol Int; 2021; 105(7-8):642-649. PubMed ID: 33567431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: Initial experience with 3D vision laparoscopy and articulating shears.
    Abou-Haidar H; Al-Qaoud T; Jednak R; Brzezinski A; El-Sherbiny M; Capolicchio JP
    J Pediatr Urol; 2016 Dec; 12(6):426.e1-426.e5. PubMed ID: 27889223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Pediatric robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: Does age matter?
    Kawal T; Srinivasan AK; Shrivastava D; Chu DI; Van Batavia J; Weiss D; Long C; Shukla AR
    J Pediatr Urol; 2018 Dec; 14(6):540.e1-540.e6. PubMed ID: 29909190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Robot-assisted surgery versus laparoscopic surgery of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Chen Z; Xu H; Wang C; Hu S; Ali M; Wang Y; Kai Z
    J Robot Surg; 2023 Oct; 17(5):1891-1906. PubMed ID: 37310527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. An innovative technique of robotic-assisted/laparoscopic re-pyeloplasty in horseshoe kidney in patients with failed previous pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
    Khoder WY; Alghamdi A; Schulz T; Becker AJ; Schlenker B; Stief CG
    Surg Endosc; 2016 Sep; 30(9):4124-9. PubMed ID: 26675936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Outcomes of infants undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty compared to open repair.
    Dangle PP; Kearns J; Anderson B; Gundeti MS
    J Urol; 2013 Dec; 190(6):2221-6. PubMed ID: 23911637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.