These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Weak rhesus D (RH1) grouping on the Olympus PK7100 blood grouping system. Moncharmont P; Giannoli C; Chirat V; Chalard T Transfus Med; 1997 Mar; 7(1):66-7. PubMed ID: 9089989 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The Rh-negative donor. Contreras M; Knight RC Clin Lab Haematol; 1989; 11(4):317-22. PubMed ID: 2514064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Incidence of weak D in blood donors typed as D positive by the Olympus PK 7200. Jenkins CM; Johnson ST; Bellissimo DB; Gottschall JL Immunohematology; 2005; 21(4):152-4. PubMed ID: 16472016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Efficient and safe definition of the rhesus-negative donor on the olympus PK 7200 without the indirect antiglobulin test for weak D. Mertens G; Muylle L Vox Sang; 1996; 70(4):237-8. PubMed ID: 9123933 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. UV-visible spectrophotometric approach to blood typing II: phenotyping of subtype A2 and weak D and whole blood analysis. Narayanan S; Galloway L; Nonoyama A; Leparc GF; Garcia-Rubio LH; Potter RL Transfusion; 2002 May; 42(5):619-26. PubMed ID: 12084171 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of an automated microplate technique in the Galileo system for ABO and Rh(D) blood grouping. Xu W; Wan F; Lou Y; Jin J; Mao W Clin Lab; 2014; 60(2):241-4. PubMed ID: 24660536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Trial of ABO and Rh blood typing with an automated blood cell counter. Tatsumi N; Tsuda I; Inoue K Clin Lab Haematol; 1989; 11(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 2504533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of immunohematologic routine methods using the new erythrocyte-magnetized technology on the QWALYS 2 system. Schoenfeld H; Bulling K; von Heymann C; Neuner B; Kalus U; Kiesewetter H; Pruss A Transfusion; 2009 Jul; 49(7):1347-52. PubMed ID: 19389030 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Monoclonal reagents for rhesus-D typing of Irish patients and donors: a review. Williams M Br J Biomed Sci; 2000; 57(2):142-9. PubMed ID: 10912289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Validation of a hospital-laboratory workstation for immunohematologic methods. Schoenfeld H; Pretzel KJ; von Heymann C; Neuner B; Kalus U; Kiesewetter H; Pruss A Transfusion; 2010 Jan; 50(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 19709392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of the gel system for ABO grouping and D typing. Langston MM; Procter JL; Cipolone KM; Stroncek DF Transfusion; 1999 Mar; 39(3):300-5. PubMed ID: 10204594 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Weak D antigen testing using the groupamatic system. Glackin KC; Sherwood WC; Hoppe PA; McIntyre K Vox Sang; 1984; 47(1):82-7. PubMed ID: 6429956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A microplate system for ABO and Rh(D) blood grouping. Chung A; Birch P; Ilagan K Transfusion; 1993 May; 33(5):384-8. PubMed ID: 8110210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of polyethylene terephthalate for ABO and Rh typing and alloantibody screening. Anderson DR; Wiseman J; MacLeod J; Burton E; Zayed E Transfusion; 2000 Jun; 40(6):669-72. PubMed ID: 10864986 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Automated blood grouping by gel technology. Parker PI; Scott Y; McArdle B; Wallis JP Br J Biomed Sci; 1995 Dec; 52(4):266-70. PubMed ID: 8555780 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Optimal blood grouping and antibody screening for safe transfusion. Makarovska-Bojadzieva T; Blagoevska M; Kolevski P; Kostovska S Prilozi; 2009 Jul; 30(1):119-28. PubMed ID: 19736535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A multicenter study on the performance of a fully automated, walk-away high-throughput analyzer for pretransfusion testing in the US population. Roback JD; Barclay S; Moulds JM; Denomme GA Transfusion; 2015 Jun; 55(6 Pt 2):1522-8. PubMed ID: 25753019 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]