These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31507420)

  • 21. Improving structure-based virtual screening performance via learning from scoring function components.
    Xiong GL; Ye WL; Shen C; Lu AP; Hou TJ; Cao DS
    Brief Bioinform; 2021 May; 22(3):. PubMed ID: 32496540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Machine-Learning- and Knowledge-Based Scoring Functions Incorporating Ligand and Protein Fingerprints.
    Fujimoto KJ; Minami S; Yanai T
    ACS Omega; 2022 Jun; 7(22):19030-19039. PubMed ID: 35694525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Docking-based virtual screening of TβR1 inhibitors: evaluation of pose prediction and scoring functions.
    Wang S; Jiang JH; Li RY; Deng P
    BMC Chem; 2020 Dec; 14(1):52. PubMed ID: 32818203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Support vector regression scoring of receptor-ligand complexes for rank-ordering and virtual screening of chemical libraries.
    Li L; Wang B; Meroueh SO
    J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Sep; 51(9):2132-8. PubMed ID: 21728360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. TS-Chemscore, a Target-Specific Scoring Function, Significantly Improves the Performance of Scoring in Virtual Screening.
    Wang WJ; Huang Q; Zou J; Li LL; Yang SY
    Chem Biol Drug Des; 2015 Jul; 86(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 25358259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Machine Learning Classification Models to Improve the Docking-based Screening: A Case of PI3K-Tankyrase Inhibitors.
    Berishvili VP; Voronkov AE; Radchenko EV; Palyulin VA
    Mol Inform; 2018 Nov; 37(11):e1800030. PubMed ID: 29901257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Scoring Functions for Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction using Structure-Based Deep Learning: A Review.
    Meli R; Morris GM; Biggin PC
    Front Bioinform; 2022 Jun; 2():. PubMed ID: 36187180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. ASFP (Artificial Intelligence based Scoring Function Platform): a web server for the development of customized scoring functions.
    Zhang X; Shen C; Guo X; Wang Z; Weng G; Ye Q; Wang G; He Q; Yang B; Cao D; Hou T
    J Cheminform; 2021 Feb; 13(1):6. PubMed ID: 33541407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Optimization of compound ranking for structure-based virtual ligand screening using an established FRED-Surflex consensus approach.
    Du J; Bleylevens IW; Bitorina AV; Wichapong K; Nicolaes GA
    Chem Biol Drug Des; 2014 Jan; 83(1):37-51. PubMed ID: 23941463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Beware of machine learning-based scoring functions-on the danger of developing black boxes.
    Gabel J; Desaphy J; Rognan D
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Oct; 54(10):2807-15. PubMed ID: 25207678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of structure- and ligand-based scoring functions for deep generative models: a GPCR case study.
    Thomas M; Smith RT; O'Boyle NM; de Graaf C; Bender A
    J Cheminform; 2021 May; 13(1):39. PubMed ID: 33985583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Protein Family-Specific Models Using Deep Neural Networks and Transfer Learning Improve Virtual Screening and Highlight the Need for More Data.
    Imrie F; Bradley AR; van der Schaar M; Deane CM
    J Chem Inf Model; 2018 Nov; 58(11):2319-2330. PubMed ID: 30273487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Convolutional neural network scoring and minimization in the D3R 2017 community challenge.
    Sunseri J; King JE; Francoeur PG; Koes DR
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2019 Jan; 33(1):19-34. PubMed ID: 29992528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. CompScore: Boosting Structure-Based Virtual Screening Performance by Incorporating Docking Scoring Function Components into Consensus Scoring.
    Perez-Castillo Y; Sotomayor-Burneo S; Jimenes-Vargas K; Gonzalez-Rodriguez M; Cruz-Monteagudo M; Armijos-Jaramillo V; Cordeiro MNDS; Borges F; Sánchez-Rodríguez A; Tejera E
    J Chem Inf Model; 2019 Sep; 59(9):3655-3666. PubMed ID: 31449403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Development and evaluation of a deep learning model for protein-ligand binding affinity prediction.
    Stepniewska-Dziubinska MM; Zielenkiewicz P; Siedlecki P
    Bioinformatics; 2018 Nov; 34(21):3666-3674. PubMed ID: 29757353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Profiling prediction of nuclear receptor modulators with multi-task deep learning methods: toward the virtual screening.
    Wang J; Lou C; Liu G; Li W; Wu Z; Tang Y
    Brief Bioinform; 2022 Sep; 23(5):. PubMed ID: 35998896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Visualizing convolutional neural network protein-ligand scoring.
    Hochuli J; Helbling A; Skaist T; Ragoza M; Koes DR
    J Mol Graph Model; 2018 Sep; 84():96-108. PubMed ID: 29940506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Improved Method of Structure-Based Virtual Screening via Interaction-Energy-Based Learning.
    Yasuo N; Sekijima M
    J Chem Inf Model; 2019 Mar; 59(3):1050-1061. PubMed ID: 30808172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Supervised consensus scoring for docking and virtual screening.
    Teramoto R; Fukunishi H
    J Chem Inf Model; 2007; 47(2):526-34. PubMed ID: 17295466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Boosting Docking-Based Virtual Screening with Deep Learning.
    Pereira JC; Caffarena ER; Dos Santos CN
    J Chem Inf Model; 2016 Dec; 56(12):2495-2506. PubMed ID: 28024405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.