These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31508334)

  • 21. Lateral preference in mastication: an electromyographic study.
    Christensen LV; Radue JT
    J Oral Rehabil; 1985 Sep; 12(5):429-34. PubMed ID: 3862802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of bolus hardness on the chewing pattern and activation of masticatory muscles in subjects with normal dental occlusion.
    Piancino MG; Bracco P; Vallelonga T; Merlo A; Farina D
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2008 Dec; 18(6):931-7. PubMed ID: 17616401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Relationships between chewing rate, occlusion, cephalometric anatomy, muscle activity, and masticatory performance.
    Fulks BA; Callaghan KX; Tewksbury CD; Gerstner GE
    Arch Oral Biol; 2017 Nov; 83():161-168. PubMed ID: 28780385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A comparison of the methods used to determine chewing preference.
    Varela JM; Castro NB; Biedma BM; Da Silva Domínguez JL; Quintanilla JS; Muñoz FM; Penín US; Bahillo JG
    J Oral Rehabil; 2003 Oct; 30(10):990-4. PubMed ID: 12974858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Coordination between the masticatory and tongue muscles as seen with different foods in consistency and in reflex activities during natural chewing.
    Kakizaki Y; Uchida K; Yamamura K; Yamada Y
    Brain Res; 2002 Mar; 929(2):210-7. PubMed ID: 11864626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The influence of partial implant-supported restorations on chewing side preference.
    Nissan J; Berman O; Gross O; Haim B; Chaushu G
    J Oral Rehabil; 2011 Mar; 38(3):165-9. PubMed ID: 20673296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Masseter muscle activity in denture wearers with superior and poor masticatory performance.
    Garrett NR; Kaurich M; Perez P; Kapur KK
    J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Dec; 74(6):628-36. PubMed ID: 8778388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Hemispheric dominance of tongue control depends on the chewing-side preference.
    Shinagawa H; Ono T; Ishiwata Y; Honda E; Sasaki T; Taira M; Iriki A; Kuroda T
    J Dent Res; 2003 Apr; 82(4):278-83. PubMed ID: 12651931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The effect of a crunchy pseudo-chewing sound on perceived texture of softened foods.
    Endo H; Ino S; Fujisaki W
    Physiol Behav; 2016 Dec; 167():324-331. PubMed ID: 27720736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effect of chewing speed on the detection of a foreign object in food.
    Paphangkorakit J; Ladsena V; Rukyuttithamkul T; Khamtad T
    J Oral Rehabil; 2016 Mar; 43(3):176-9. PubMed ID: 26462611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Electromyographic evaluation of masticatory muscles in dentate patients versus conventional and implant-supported fixed and removable denture wearers- a preliminary report comparing model foods.
    Uram-Tuculescu S; Cooper LF; Foegeding EA; Vinyard CJ; De Kok IJ; Essick G
    Int J Prosthodont; 2015; 28(1):79-92. PubMed ID: 25588179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Peripheral, functional and postural asymmetries related to the preferred chewing side in adults with natural dentition.
    Rovira-Lastra B; Flores-Orozco EI; Ayuso-Montero R; Peraire M; Martinez-Gomis J
    J Oral Rehabil; 2016 Apr; 43(4):279-85. PubMed ID: 26549578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effect of body posture on chewing behaviours in healthy volunteers.
    Iizumi T; Magara J; Tsujimura T; Inoue M
    J Oral Rehabil; 2017 Nov; 44(11):835-842. PubMed ID: 28853169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Electromyography analysis of natural mastication behavior using varying mouthful quantities of two types of gels.
    Kohyama K; Gao Z; Ishihara S; Funami T; Nishinari K
    Physiol Behav; 2016 Jul; 161():174-182. PubMed ID: 27102709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Manifestation of preferred chewing side for hard food on TMJ disc displacement side.
    Ratnasari A; Hasegawa K; Oki K; Kawakami S; Yanagi Y; Asaumi JI; Minagi S
    J Oral Rehabil; 2011 Jan; 38(1):12-7. PubMed ID: 20673297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effects of dentition status and personality on masticatory performance and food acceptability.
    Garcia RI; Perlmuter LC; Chauncey HH
    Dysphagia; 1989; 4(2):121-6. PubMed ID: 2640181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Relations of laterality and chewing sidedness in twins.
    Pihlaja K; Vuollo V; Sidlauskas M; Harila V; Sidlauskas A; Salomskiene L; Heikkinen T
    Eur J Orthod; 2019 May; 41(3):244-249. PubMed ID: 29982485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effects of feeding a soft diet and subsequent rehabilitation on the development of the masticatory function.
    Fujishita A; Koga Y; Utsumi D; Nakamura A; Yoshimi T; Yoshida N
    J Oral Rehabil; 2015 Apr; 42(4):266-74. PubMed ID: 25354553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Is the side with the best masticatory performance selected for chewing?
    Rovira-Lastra B; Flores-Orozco EI; Salsench J; Peraire M; Martinez-Gomis J
    Arch Oral Biol; 2014 Dec; 59(12):1316-20. PubMed ID: 25173664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effect of food properties and chewing condition on the electromyographic activity of the posterior tongue.
    Manda Y; Kodama N; Maeda N; Minagi S
    J Oral Rehabil; 2019 Jun; 46(6):511-517. PubMed ID: 30724370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.