These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31509601)

  • 21. Orienting to eye gaze and face processing.
    Tipples J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Oct; 31(5):843-56. PubMed ID: 16262482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Averted body postures facilitate orienting of the eyes.
    Azarian B; Buzzell GA; Esser EG; Dornstauder A; Peterson MS
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Apr; 175():28-32. PubMed ID: 28266311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Sex differences for the recognition of direct versus averted gaze faces.
    Goodman LR; Phelan HL; Johnson SA
    Memory; 2012; 20(3):199-209. PubMed ID: 22292806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Target object moderation of attentional orienting by gazes or arrows.
    Yan T; Zhao S; Uono S; Bi X; Tian A; Yoshimura S; Toichi M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Nov; 78(8):2373-2382. PubMed ID: 27506428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The center of attention: Metamers, sensitivity, and bias in the emergent perception of gaze.
    Sweeny TD; Whitney D
    Vision Res; 2017 Feb; 131():67-74. PubMed ID: 28057579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Gaze constancy in upright and inverted faces.
    Otsuka Y; Mareschal I; Clifford CW
    J Vis; 2015 Jan; 15(1):15.1.21. PubMed ID: 25613759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Feeling through another's eyes: Perceived gaze direction impacts ERP and behavioural measures of positive and negative affective empathy.
    McCrackin SD; Itier RJ
    Neuroimage; 2021 Feb; 226():117605. PubMed ID: 33271267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Amygdala processing of social cues from faces: an intracrebral EEG study.
    Huijgen J; Dinkelacker V; Lachat F; Yahia-Cherif L; El Karoui I; Lemaréchal JD; Adam C; Hugueville L; George N
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2015 Nov; 10(11):1568-76. PubMed ID: 25964498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Visual attention and action: How cueing, direct mapping, and social interactions drive orienting.
    Atkinson MA; Simpson AA; Cole GG
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Oct; 25(5):1585-1605. PubMed ID: 28808932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Perception of illusory shift of gaze direction by infants.
    Nakato E; Otsuka Y; Konuma H; Kanazawa S; Yamaguchi MK; Tomonaga M
    Infant Behav Dev; 2009 Dec; 32(4):422-8. PubMed ID: 19700199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The appeal of the devil's eye: social evaluation affects social attention.
    Carraro L; Dalmaso M; Castelli L; Galfano G; Bobbio A; Mantovani G
    Cogn Process; 2017 Feb; 18(1):97-103. PubMed ID: 27837290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Revisiting the relationship between the processing of gaze direction and the processing of facial expression.
    Ganel T
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Feb; 37(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 20718561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Version-vergence interactions during memory-guided binocular gaze shifts.
    Dits J; Pel JJ; Remmers A; van der Steen J
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2013 Mar; 54(3):1656-64. PubMed ID: 23404114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Attention orienting by another's gaze direction in children with autism.
    Kylliäinen A; Hietanen JK
    J Child Psychol Psychiatry; 2004 Mar; 45(3):435-44. PubMed ID: 15055364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The developmental trajectory of attentional orienting to socio-biological cues.
    Gregory NJ; Hermens F; Facey R; Hodgson TL
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Jun; 234(6):1351-62. PubMed ID: 27060906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Overlapping and distinct neural correlates of imitating and opposing facial movements.
    Godinez DA; Lumian DS; Crosby-Attipoe T; Bedacarratz AM; Zarolia P; McRae K
    Neuroimage; 2018 Feb; 166():239-246. PubMed ID: 29111411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. How different cultures look at faces depends on the interpersonal context.
    Gobel MS; Chen A; Richardson DC
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2017 Sep; 71(3):258-264. PubMed ID: 28604033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Measuring attentional bias to peripheral facial deformities.
    Ishii L; Carey J; Byrne P; Zee DS; Ishii M
    Laryngoscope; 2009 Mar; 119(3):459-65. PubMed ID: 19235748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The effect of arousal and eye gaze direction on trust evaluations of stranger's faces: A potential pathway to paranoid thinking.
    Abbott J; Middlemiss M; Bruce V; Smailes D; Dudley R
    J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry; 2018 Sep; 60():29-36. PubMed ID: 29510264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Eyes only? Perceiving eye contact is neither sufficient nor necessary for attentional capture by face direction.
    Böckler A; van der Wel RP; Welsh TN
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Sep; 160():134-40. PubMed ID: 26245915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.