These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31510691)

  • 21. A Machine Learning Approach for the Discovery of Ligand-Specific Functional Mechanisms of GPCRs.
    Plante A; Shore DM; Morra G; Khelashvili G; Weinstein H
    Molecules; 2019 Jun; 24(11):. PubMed ID: 31159491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. DeepMSA: constructing deep multiple sequence alignment to improve contact prediction and fold-recognition for distant-homology proteins.
    Zhang C; Zheng W; Mortuza SM; Li Y; Zhang Y
    Bioinformatics; 2020 Apr; 36(7):2105-2112. PubMed ID: 31738385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. FUpred: detecting protein domains through deep-learning-based contact map prediction.
    Zheng W; Zhou X; Wuyun Q; Pearce R; Li Y; Zhang Y
    Bioinformatics; 2020 Jun; 36(12):3749-3757. PubMed ID: 32227201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. GPCR-PEnDB: a database of protein sequences and derived features to facilitate prediction and classification of G protein-coupled receptors.
    Begum K; Mohl JE; Ayivor F; Perez EE; Leung MY
    Database (Oxford); 2020 Nov; 2020():. PubMed ID: 33216895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. pdCSM-GPCR: predicting potent GPCR ligands with graph-based signatures.
    Velloso JPL; Ascher DB; Pires DEV
    Bioinform Adv; 2021; 1(1):vbab031. PubMed ID: 34901870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Chemical genomics approach for GPCR-ligand interaction prediction and extraction of ligand binding determinants.
    Shiraishi A; Niijima S; Brown JB; Nakatsui M; Okuno Y
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Jun; 53(6):1253-62. PubMed ID: 23721295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Protein-ligand interaction prediction: an improved chemogenomics approach.
    Jacob L; Vert JP
    Bioinformatics; 2008 Oct; 24(19):2149-56. PubMed ID: 18676415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. SSIPe: accurately estimating protein-protein binding affinity change upon mutations using evolutionary profiles in combination with an optimized physical energy function.
    Huang X; Zheng W; Pearce R; Zhang Y
    Bioinformatics; 2020 Apr; 36(8):2429-2437. PubMed ID: 31830252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Quantitative and systems pharmacology 2. In silico polypharmacology of G protein-coupled receptor ligands via network-based approaches.
    Wu Z; Lu W; Yu W; Wang T; Li W; Liu G; Zhang H; Pang X; Huang J; Liu M; Cheng F; Tang Y
    Pharmacol Res; 2018 Mar; 129():400-413. PubMed ID: 29133212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Galaxy7TM: flexible GPCR-ligand docking by structure refinement.
    Lee GR; Seok C
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2016 Jul; 44(W1):W502-6. PubMed ID: 27131365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Prediction of the coupling specificity of GPCRs to four families of G-proteins using hidden Markov models and artificial neural networks.
    Sgourakis NG; Bagos PG; Hamodrakas SJ
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Nov; 21(22):4101-6. PubMed ID: 16174684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Improving virtual screening of G protein-coupled receptors via ligand-directed modeling.
    Coudrat T; Simms J; Christopoulos A; Wootten D; Sexton PM
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2017 Nov; 13(11):e1005819. PubMed ID: 29131821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. DCyFIR: a high-throughput CRISPR platform for multiplexed G protein-coupled receptor profiling and ligand discovery.
    Kapolka NJ; Taghon GJ; Rowe JB; Morgan WM; Enten JF; Lambert NA; Isom DG
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 Jun; 117(23):13117-13126. PubMed ID: 32434907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Benchmarking GPCR homology model template selection in combination with de novo loop generation.
    Szwabowski GL; Castleman PN; Sears CK; Wink LH; Cole JA; Baker DL; Parrill AL
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2020 Oct; 34(10):1027-1044. PubMed ID: 32737667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. An unbiased method to build benchmarking sets for ligand-based virtual screening and its application to GPCRs.
    Xia J; Jin H; Liu Z; Zhang L; Wang XS
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 May; 54(5):1433-50. PubMed ID: 24749745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Emerging Approaches to GPCR Ligand Screening for Drug Discovery.
    Kumari P; Ghosh E; Shukla AK
    Trends Mol Med; 2015 Nov; 21(11):687-701. PubMed ID: 26481827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. PanGPCR: predictions for multiple targets, repurposing and side effects.
    Liu LC; Ho MY; Su BH; Wang SY; Hsu MT; Tseng YJ
    Bioinformatics; 2021 May; 37(8):1184-1186. PubMed ID: 32915954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Development and validation of a novel protein-ligand fingerprint to mine chemogenomic space: application to G protein-coupled receptors and their ligands.
    Weill N; Rognan D
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Apr; 49(4):1049-62. PubMed ID: 19301874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Virtual screen for ligands of orphan G protein-coupled receptors.
    Bock JR; Gough DA
    J Chem Inf Model; 2005; 45(5):1402-14. PubMed ID: 16180917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. GPCR-MPredictor: multi-level prediction of G protein-coupled receptors using genetic ensemble.
    Naveed M; Khan A
    Amino Acids; 2012 May; 42(5):1809-23. PubMed ID: 21505826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.