These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

301 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31511182)

  • 1. Are Healthcare Choices Predictable? The Impact of Discrete Choice Experiment Designs and Models.
    de Bekker-Grob EW; Swait JD; Kassahun HT; Bliemer MCJ; Jonker MF; Veldwijk J; Cong K; Rose JM; Donkers B
    Value Health; 2019 Sep; 22(9):1050-1062. PubMed ID: 31511182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Can healthcare choice be predicted using stated preference data?
    de Bekker-Grob EW; Donkers B; Bliemer MCJ; Veldwijk J; Swait JD
    Soc Sci Med; 2020 Feb; 246():112736. PubMed ID: 31887626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Can healthcare choice be predicted using stated preference data? The role of model complexity in a discrete choice experiment about colorectal cancer screening.
    Huls SPI; de Bekker-Grob EW
    Soc Sci Med; 2022 Dec; 315():115530. PubMed ID: 36434890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accounting for Scale Heterogeneity in Healthcare-Related Discrete Choice Experiments when Comparing Stated Preferences: A Systematic Review.
    Wright SJ; Vass CM; Sim G; Burton M; Fiebig DG; Payne K
    Patient; 2018 Oct; 11(5):475-488. PubMed ID: 29492903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Do patients and health care providers have discordant preferences about which aspects of treatments matter most? Evidence from a systematic review of discrete choice experiments.
    Harrison M; Milbers K; Hudson M; Bansback N
    BMJ Open; 2017 May; 7(5):e014719. PubMed ID: 28515194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How well do discrete choice experiments predict health choices? A systematic review and meta-analysis of external validity.
    Quaife M; Terris-Prestholt F; Di Tanna GL; Vickerman P
    Eur J Health Econ; 2018 Nov; 19(8):1053-1066. PubMed ID: 29380229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Testing the External Validity of a Discrete Choice Experiment Method: An Application to Latent Tuberculosis Infection Treatment.
    Mohammadi T; Bansback N; Marra F; Khakban A; Campbell JR; FitzGerald JM; Lynd LD; Marra CA
    Value Health; 2017; 20(7):969-975. PubMed ID: 28712627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Labeled versus unlabeled discrete choice experiments in health economics: an application to colorectal cancer screening.
    de Bekker-Grob EW; Hol L; Donkers B; van Dam L; Habbema JD; van Leerdam ME; Kuipers EJ; Essink-Bot ML; Steyerberg EW
    Value Health; 2010; 13(2):315-23. PubMed ID: 19912597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Decision-makers' preferences for approving new medicines in Wales: a discrete-choice experiment with assessment of external validity.
    Linley WG; Hughes DA
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2013 Apr; 31(4):345-55. PubMed ID: 23516033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Survival or Mortality: Does Risk Attribute Framing Influence Decision-Making Behavior in a Discrete Choice Experiment?
    Veldwijk J; Essers BA; Lambooij MS; Dirksen CD; Smit HA; de Wit GA
    Value Health; 2016; 19(2):202-9. PubMed ID: 27021754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An Exploratory Application of Eye-Tracking Methods in a Discrete Choice Experiment.
    Vass C; Rigby D; Tate K; Stewart A; Payne K
    Med Decis Making; 2018 Aug; 38(6):658-672. PubMed ID: 30074879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. For better or worse? Investigating the validity of best-worst discrete choice experiments in health.
    Krucien N; Sicsic J; Ryan M
    Health Econ; 2019 Apr; 28(4):572-586. PubMed ID: 30761661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mimicking Real-Life Decision Making in Health: Allowing Respondents Time to Think in a Discrete Choice Experiment.
    Veldwijk J; Johansson JV; Donkers B; de Bekker-Grob EW
    Value Health; 2020 Jul; 23(7):945-952. PubMed ID: 32762997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Exploring how individuals complete the choice tasks in a discrete choice experiment: an interview study.
    Veldwijk J; Determann D; Lambooij MS; van Til JA; Korfage IJ; de Bekker-Grob EW; de Wit GA
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Apr; 16():45. PubMed ID: 27098746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Empirical Testing of the External Validity of a Discrete Choice Experiment to Determine Preferred Treatment Option: The Case of Sleep Apnea.
    Krucien N; Gafni A; Pelletier-Fleury N
    Health Econ; 2015 Aug; 24(8):951-65. PubMed ID: 24986760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Getting it right with discrete choice experiments: Are we hot or cold?
    Ozdemir S; Gonzalez JM; Bansal P; Huynh VA; Sng BL; Finkelstein E
    Soc Sci Med; 2024 May; 348():116850. PubMed ID: 38608481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improving the quality of discrete-choice experiments in health: how can we assess validity and reliability?
    Janssen EM; Marshall DA; Hauber AB; Bridges JFP
    Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2017 Dec; 17(6):531-542. PubMed ID: 29058478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A closer look at decision and analyst error by including nonlinearities in discrete choice models: implications on willingness-to-pay estimates derived from discrete choice data in healthcare.
    de Bekker-Grob EW; Rose JM; Bliemer MC
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2013 Dec; 31(12):1169-83. PubMed ID: 24178372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Preferences heterogeneity of health care utilization of community residents in China: a stated preference discrete choice experiment.
    Jiang MZ; Fu Q; Xiong JY; Li XL; Jia EP; Peng YY; Shen X
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2020 May; 20(1):430. PubMed ID: 32423447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.