BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31511591)

  • 21. Probing Nanoelectroporation and Resealing of the Cell Membrane by the Entry of Ca
    Bo W; Silkunas M; Mangalanathan U; Novickij V; Casciola M; Semenov I; Xiao S; Pakhomova ON; Pakhomov AG
    Int J Mol Sci; 2020 May; 21(9):. PubMed ID: 32403282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The interplay of excitation and electroporation in nanosecond pulse stimulation.
    Pakhomov AG; Pakhomova ON
    Bioelectrochemistry; 2020 Dec; 136():107598. PubMed ID: 32711366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Electropermeabilization of cells by closely spaced paired nanosecond-range pulses.
    Semenov I; Casciola M; Ibey BL; Xiao S; Pakhomov AG
    Bioelectrochemistry; 2018 Jun; 121():135-141. PubMed ID: 29413863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Electroporation of mammalian cells by nanosecond electric field oscillations and its inhibition by the electric field reversal.
    Gianulis EC; Lee J; Jiang C; Xiao S; Ibey BL; Pakhomov AG
    Sci Rep; 2015 Sep; 5():13818. PubMed ID: 26348662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Receptor- and store-operated mechanisms of calcium entry during the nanosecond electric pulse-induced cellular response.
    Tolstykh GP; Cantu JC; Tarango M; Ibey BL
    Biochim Biophys Acta Biomembr; 2019 Mar; 1861(3):685-696. PubMed ID: 30552899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Diffuse, non-polar electropermeabilization and reduced propidium uptake distinguish the effect of nanosecond electric pulses.
    Semenov I; Zemlin C; Pakhomova ON; Xiao S; Pakhomov AG
    Biochim Biophys Acta; 2015 Oct; 1848(10 Pt A):2118-25. PubMed ID: 26112464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Nanoelectropulse-driven membrane perturbation and small molecule permeabilization.
    Vernier PT; Sun Y; Gundersen MA
    BMC Cell Biol; 2006 Oct; 7():37. PubMed ID: 17052354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Bipolar nanosecond electric pulses are less efficient at electropermeabilization and killing cells than monopolar pulses.
    Ibey BL; Ullery JC; Pakhomova ON; Roth CC; Semenov I; Beier HT; Tarango M; Xiao S; Schoenbach KH; Pakhomov AG
    Biochem Biophys Res Commun; 2014 Jan; 443(2):568-73. PubMed ID: 24332942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Cancellation of nerve excitation by the reversal of nanosecond stimulus polarity and its relevance to the gating time of sodium channels.
    Casciola M; Xiao S; Apollonio F; Paffi A; Liberti M; Muratori C; Pakhomov AG
    Cell Mol Life Sci; 2019 Nov; 76(22):4539-4550. PubMed ID: 31055644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Modulation of biological responses to 2 ns electrical stimuli by field reversal.
    Sözer EB; Vernier PT
    Biochim Biophys Acta Biomembr; 2019 Jun; 1861(6):1228-1239. PubMed ID: 30981731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Cellular response to high pulse repetition rate nanosecond pulses varies with fluorescent marker identity.
    Steelman ZA; Tolstykh GP; Beier HT; Ibey BL
    Biochem Biophys Res Commun; 2016 Sep; 478(3):1261-7. PubMed ID: 27553279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Plasma membrane permeabilization by 60- and 600-ns electric pulses is determined by the absorbed dose.
    Ibey BL; Xiao S; Schoenbach KH; Murphy MR; Pakhomov AG
    Bioelectromagnetics; 2009 Feb; 30(2):92-9. PubMed ID: 18839412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Quantification of cell membrane permeability induced by monopolar and high-frequency bipolar bursts of electrical pulses.
    Sweeney DC; Reberšek M; Dermol J; Rems L; Miklavčič D; Davalos RV
    Biochim Biophys Acta; 2016 Nov; 1858(11):2689-2698. PubMed ID: 27372268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Nanosecond electric pulse effects on gene expression.
    Chopinet L; Batista-Napotnik T; Montigny A; Rebersek M; Teissié J; Rols MP; Miklavčič D
    J Membr Biol; 2013 Nov; 246(11):851-9. PubMed ID: 23831956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. 2-ns Electrostimulation of Ca
    Zaklit J; Craviso GL; Leblanc N; Vernier PT; Sözer EB
    Biophys J; 2021 Feb; 120(3):556-567. PubMed ID: 33359835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Cancellation effect is present in high-frequency reversible and irreversible electroporation.
    Polajžer T; Dermol-Černe J; Reberšek M; O'Connor R; Miklavčič D
    Bioelectrochemistry; 2020 Apr; 132():107442. PubMed ID: 31923714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Nanosecond electric pulses cause mitochondrial membrane permeabilization in Jurkat cells.
    Batista Napotnik T; Wu YH; Gundersen MA; Miklavčič D; Vernier PT
    Bioelectromagnetics; 2012 Apr; 33(3):257-64. PubMed ID: 21953203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The cytotoxic synergy of nanosecond electric pulses and low temperature leads to apoptosis.
    Muratori C; Pakhomov AG; Gianulis EC; Jensen SD; Pakhomova ON
    Sci Rep; 2016 Nov; 6():36835. PubMed ID: 27833151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Frequency spectrum of induced transmembrane potential and permeabilization efficacy of bipolar electric pulses.
    Merla C; Pakhomov AG; Semenov I; Vernier PT
    Biochim Biophys Acta Biomembr; 2017 Jul; 1859(7):1282-1290. PubMed ID: 28432034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Ion transport into cells exposed to monopolar and bipolar nanosecond pulses.
    Schoenbach KH; Pakhomov AG; Semenov I; Xiao S; Pakhomova ON; Ibey BL
    Bioelectrochemistry; 2015 Jun; 103():44-51. PubMed ID: 25212701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.