643 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31512014)
21. Laminoplasty Does not Lead to Worsening Axial Neck Pain in the Properly Selected Patient With Cervical Myelopathy: A Comparison With Laminectomy and Fusion.
Stephens BF; Rhee JM; Neustein TM; Arceo R
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2017 Dec; 42(24):1844-1850. PubMed ID: 28658033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion versus posterior laminoplasty for the treatment of oppressive myelopathy owing to cervical ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament: a meta-analysis.
Qin R; Chen X; Zhou P; Li M; Hao J; Zhang F
Eur Spine J; 2018 Jun; 27(6):1375-1387. PubMed ID: 29335903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Surgical results and complications of anterior decompression and fusion as a revision surgery after initial posterior surgery for cervical myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament.
Odate S; Shikata J; Soeda T; Yamamura S; Kawaguchi S
J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Apr; 26(4):466-473. PubMed ID: 28128699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Impact of preoperative cervical sagittal alignment for cervical myelopathy caused by ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament on surgical treatment.
Sakai K; Yoshii T; Arai Y; Hirai T; Torigoe I; Inose H; Tomori M; Sakaki K; Matsukura Y; Okawa A
J Orthop Sci; 2022 Nov; 27(6):1208-1214. PubMed ID: 34598845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Modified K-line for Making Decisions Regarding the Surgical Approach in Patients with K-line (-) OPLL.
Liu X; Tan B; Xiao B; Zou X; Liu S
Orthop Surg; 2021 Jun; 13(4):1351-1358. PubMed ID: 33998781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion vs posterior laminoplasty for the treatment of myelopathy due to two-level localized ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament.
Noh SH; Kim KH; Park JY; Kuh SU; Chin DK; Kim KS; Cho YE
Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Aug; 99(33):e20955. PubMed ID: 32871974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Instrumented fusion versus instrumented non-fusion following expansive open-door laminoplasty for multilevel cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament.
Shi H; Chen L; Zhu L; Jiang ZL; Wu XT
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2023 Jun; 143(6):2919-2927. PubMed ID: 35678891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Factors Associated With Loss of Cervical Lordosis After Laminoplasty for Patients With Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: Data From a Prospective Multicenter Study.
Nakashima H; Imagama S; Yoshii T; Egawa S; Sakai K; Kusano K; Tsutsui S; Hirai T; Matsukura Y; Wada K; Katsumi K; Koda M; Kimura A; Furuya T; Maki S; Nagoshi N; Nishida N; Nagamoto Y; Oshima Y; Ando K; Takahata M; Mori K; Nakajima H; Murata K; Miyagi M; Kaito T; Yamada K; Banno T; Kato S; Ohba T; Moridaira H; Fujibayashi S; Katoh H; Kanno H; Taneichi H; Kawaguchi Y; Takeshita K; Nakamura M; Okawa A; Yamazaki M
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2023 Aug; 48(15):1047-1056. PubMed ID: 37146070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Surgical strategy for multilevel severe ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament in the cervical spine.
Chen Y; Guo Y; Lu X; Chen D; Song D; Shi J; Yuan W
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 Feb; 24(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 20924295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of Laminectomy with Fusion and Laminoplasty Treating Multilevel Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.
Dai L; Du K; Guo P; Gong H; Wang W; Hou X; Qin C; Zhang C
World Neurosurg; 2024 Jun; 186():e487-e494. PubMed ID: 38583558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The Effect of Laminectomy with Instrumented Fusion Carried into the Thoracic Spine on the Sagittal Imbalance in Patients with Multilevel Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament.
Sun K; Zhang S; Yang B; Sun X; Shi J
Orthop Surg; 2021 Dec; 13(8):2280-2288. PubMed ID: 34708558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Does Preoperative T1 Slope and Cervical Lordosis Mismatching Affect Surgical Outcomes After Laminoplasty in Patients with Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy?
Rao H; Huang Y; Lan Z; Xu Z; Li G; Xu W
World Neurosurg; 2019 Oct; 130():e687-e693. PubMed ID: 31279919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Is high T-1 slope a significant risk factor for developing interlaminar bony fusion after cervical laminoplasty? A retrospective cohort study.
Oichi T; Oshima Y; Oka H; Taniguchi Y; Chikuda H; Matsubayashi Y; Takeshita K; Tanaka S
J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Dec; 27(6):627-632. PubMed ID: 28937936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Clinical outcome of laminoplasty for cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament with K-line (-) in the neck neutral position but K-line (+) in the neck extension position: A retrospective observational study.
Li J; Zhang Y; Zhang N; Xv ZK; Li H; Chen G; Li FC; Chen QX
Medicine (Baltimore); 2017 Jun; 96(22):e6964. PubMed ID: 28562546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Segmental motion at the peak of the ossification foci is independent risk factor except for mal-alignment and thick ossification foci for poor outcome after laminoplasty for cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: analyses in patients with positive K-line, lordotic alignment, and lower canal occupying ratio.
Saito J; Koda M; Furuya T; Maki S; Ijima Y; Kitamura M; Miyamoto T; Orita S; Inage K; Hasue F; Fujiyoshi T; Kamiya K; Ikeda Y; Nakajima F; Hashimoto M; Noguchi H; Takahashi H; Yamazaki M; Ohtori S
J Orthop Surg Res; 2020 Sep; 15(1):407. PubMed ID: 32928257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Laminoplasty outcomes: is there a difference between patients with degenerative stenosis and those with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament?
Meyer SA; Wu JC; Mummaneni PV
Neurosurg Focus; 2011 Mar; 30(3):E9. PubMed ID: 21361755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A Comparison of the Surgical Outcomes of Laminoplasty and Laminectomy with Fusion in the Treatment of Multilevel Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Benek B; Akcay E; Yilmaz H; Aydin M; Yurt A
Turk Neurosurg; 2021; 31(4):530-537. PubMed ID: 33759164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of clinical outcomes between laminoplasty, posterior decompression with instrumented fusion, and anterior decompression with fusion for K-line (-) cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament.
Koda M; Mochizuki M; Konishi H; Aiba A; Kadota R; Inada T; Kamiya K; Ota M; Maki S; Takahashi K; Yamazaki M; Mannoji C; Furuya T
Eur Spine J; 2016 Jul; 25(7):2294-301. PubMed ID: 27072553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Influence of extending expansive open-door laminoplasty to C1 and C2 on cervical sagittal parameters.
Wang WX; Zhao YB; Lu XD; Zhao XF; Jin YZ; Chen XW; Fan YX; Wang XN; Zhou RT; Zhao B
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2020 Feb; 21(1):75. PubMed ID: 32024507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Is laminectomy and fusion the better choice than laminoplasty for multilevel cervical myelopathy with signal changes on magnetic resonance imaging? A comparison of two posterior surgeries.
He X; Zhang JN; Liu TJ; Hao DJ
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2020 Jul; 21(1):423. PubMed ID: 32615953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
