These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31512087)

  • 1. Readers can identify the meanings of words without looking at them: Evidence from regressive eye movements.
    Schotter ER; Fennell AM
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Oct; 26(5):1697-1704. PubMed ID: 31512087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Is semantic preview benefit due to relatedness or plausibility?
    Veldre A; Andrews S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Jul; 42(7):939-52. PubMed ID: 26752734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Forced fixations, trans-saccadic integration, and word recognition: Evidence for a hybrid mechanism of saccade triggering in reading.
    Schotter ER; von der Malsburg T; Leinenger M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Apr; 45(4):677-688. PubMed ID: 29999398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Parafoveal preview benefit in sentence reading: Independent effects of plausibility and orthographic relatedness.
    Veldre A; Andrews S
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Apr; 24(2):519-528. PubMed ID: 27418260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Coordination of word recognition and oculomotor control during reading: the role of implicit lexical decisions.
    Choi W; Gordon PC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Aug; 39(4):1032-46. PubMed ID: 23106372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Predictability and parafoveal preview effects in the developing reader: Evidence from eye movements.
    Johnson RL; Oehrlein EC; Roche WL
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Jul; 44(7):973-991. PubMed ID: 29620378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dissociating preview validity and preview difficulty in parafoveal processing of word n + 1 during reading.
    Risse S; Kliegl R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Apr; 40(2):653-68. PubMed ID: 24294870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Attention and eye-movement control in reading: The selective reading paradigm.
    Reingold EM; Sheridan H; Meadmore KL; Drieghe D; Liversedge SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Dec; 42(12):2003-2020. PubMed ID: 27643527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Semantic plausibility preferentially affects the semantic preview benefit in Chinese reading: evidence from an eye-movement study.
    Zhang L; Liu Z; Zhao S; Wang J
    PeerJ; 2023; 11():e15291. PubMed ID: 37159829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Trans-saccadic parafoveal preview benefits in fluent reading: a study with fixation-related brain potentials.
    Dimigen O; Kliegl R; Sommer W
    Neuroimage; 2012 Aug; 62(1):381-93. PubMed ID: 22521255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Plausibility effects when reading one- and two-character words in Chinese: evidence from eye movements.
    Yang J; Staub A; Li N; Wang S; Rayner K
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Nov; 38(6):1801-9. PubMed ID: 22612173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Semantic and plausibility effects on preview benefit during eye fixations in Chinese reading.
    Yang J; Wang S; Tong X; Rayner K
    Read Writ; 2012 May; 25(5):1031-1052. PubMed ID: 22593624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Semantic and plausibility preview benefit effects in English: Evidence from eye movements.
    Schotter ER; Jia A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Dec; 42(12):1839-1866. PubMed ID: 27123754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Encoding the target or the plausible preview word? The nature of the plausibility preview benefit in reading Chinese.
    Yang J; Li N; Wang S; Slattery TJ; Rayner K
    Vis cogn; 2014 Jan; 22(2):193-213. PubMed ID: 24910514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Spontaneous rereading within sentences: Eye movement control and visual sampling.
    White SJ; Lantz LM; Paterson KB
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Feb; 43(2):395-413. PubMed ID: 27893273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reading sentences of uniform word length: Evidence for the adaptation of the preferred saccade length during reading.
    Cutter MG; Drieghe D; Liversedge SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Nov; 43(11):1895-1911. PubMed ID: 28406688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Lack of semantic parafoveal preview benefit in reading revisited.
    Rayner K; Schotter ER; Drieghe D
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2014 Aug; 21(4):1067-72. PubMed ID: 24496738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Word skipping in Chinese reading: The role of high-frequency preview and syntactic felicity.
    Zang C; Du H; Bai X; Yan G; Liversedge SP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Apr; 46(4):603-620. PubMed ID: 31246059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of contextual plausibility on word skipping during reading.
    Veldre A; Reichle ED; Wong R; Andrews S
    Cognition; 2020 Apr; 197():104184. PubMed ID: 31954289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Investigating word length effects in Chinese reading.
    Zang C; Fu Y; Bai X; Yan G; Liversedge SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Dec; 44(12):1831-1841. PubMed ID: 30475051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.