These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31513713)

  • 1. A Metamodeling Approach for Instant Severity Assessment and Uncertainty Quantification of Iliac Artery Stenoses.
    Heinen SGH; Gashi K; van den Heuvel DAF; de Vries JPPM; van de Vosse FN; Delhaas T; Huberts W
    J Biomech Eng; 2020 Jan; 142(1):. PubMed ID: 31513713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Application of an Adaptive Polynomial Chaos Expansion on Computationally Expensive Three-Dimensional Cardiovascular Models for Uncertainty Quantification and Sensitivity Analysis.
    Quicken S; Donders WP; van Disseldorp EM; Gashi K; Mees BM; van de Vosse FN; Lopata RG; Delhaas T; Huberts W
    J Biomech Eng; 2016 Dec; 138(12):. PubMed ID: 27636531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In Vivo Validation of Patient-Specific Pressure Gradient Calculations for Iliac Artery Stenosis Severity Assessment.
    Heinen SGH; van den Heuvel DAF; Huberts W; de Boer SW; van de Vosse FN; Delhaas T; de Vries JPM
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2017 Dec; 6(12):. PubMed ID: 29275367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A geometry-based model for non-invasive estimation of pressure gradients over iliac artery stenoses.
    Heinen SGH; van den Heuvel DAF; de Vries JPPM; van de Vosse FN; Delhaas T; Huberts W
    J Biomech; 2019 Jul; 92():67-75. PubMed ID: 31202523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Choosing a Metamodel of a Simulation Model for Uncertainty Quantification.
    de Carvalho TM; van Rosmalen J; Wolff HB; Koffijberg H; Coupé VMH
    Med Decis Making; 2022 Jan; 42(1):28-42. PubMed ID: 34098793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparative study of geometry-based methods and intra-arterial pressure measurements to assess the hemodynamic significance of equivocal iliac artery stenoses.
    Heinen SG; Huberts W; van den Heuvel DA; van de Vosse FN; de Vries JP; Delhaas T
    Vascular; 2019 Apr; 27(2):119-127. PubMed ID: 30305011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cost-Effectiveness and Value-of-Information Analysis Using Machine Learning-Based Metamodeling: A Case of Hepatitis C Treatment.
    McCandlish JA; Ayer T; Chhatwal J
    Med Decis Making; 2023 Jan; 43(1):68-77. PubMed ID: 36113098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hemodynamic significance assessment of equivocal iliac artery stenoses by comparing duplex ultrasonography with intra-arterial pressure measurements.
    Heinen SG; de Boer SW; van den Heuvel DA; Huberts W; Dekker P; van de Vosse FN; Delhaas T; de Vries JP
    J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 2018 Feb; 59(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 28849900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Uncertainty Quantification for Non-invasive Assessment of Pressure Drop Across a Coarctation of the Aorta Using CFD.
    Brüning J; Hellmeier F; Yevtushenko P; Kühne T; Goubergrits L
    Cardiovasc Eng Technol; 2018 Dec; 9(4):582-596. PubMed ID: 30284186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Image-based computational fluid dynamics for estimating pressure drop and fractional flow reserve across iliac artery stenosis: A comparison with in-vivo measurements.
    Skopalik S; Hall Barrientos P; Matthews J; Radjenovic A; Mark P; Roditi G; Paul MC
    Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2021 Dec; 37(12):e3437. PubMed ID: 33449429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Efficient sampling for polynomial chaos-based uncertainty quantification and sensitivity analysis using weighted approximate Fekete points.
    Burk KM; Narayan A; Orr JA
    Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2020 Nov; 36(11):e3395. PubMed ID: 32794272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Noninvasive assessment of pressure gradients across iliac artery stenoses: duplex and catheter correlative study.
    Strauss AL; Roth FJ; Rieger H
    J Ultrasound Med; 1993 Jan; 12(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 8455216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Introduction to Metamodeling for Reducing Computational Burden of Advanced Analyses with Health Economic Models: A Structured Overview of Metamodeling Methods in a 6-Step Application Process.
    Degeling K; IJzerman MJ; Lavieri MS; Strong M; Koffijberg H
    Med Decis Making; 2020 Apr; 40(3):348-363. PubMed ID: 32428428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sensitivity analysis of an electrophysiology model for the left ventricle.
    Del Corso G; Verzicco R; Viola F
    J R Soc Interface; 2020 Oct; 17(171):20200532. PubMed ID: 33109017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Using Metamodeling to Identify the Optimal Strategy for Colorectal Cancer Screening.
    Koffijberg H; Degeling K; IJzerman MJ; Coupé VMH; Greuter MJE
    Value Health; 2021 Feb; 24(2):206-215. PubMed ID: 33518027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Noninvasive evaluation before and after percutaneous therapy of iliac artery stenoses: the value of the Bernoulli-predicted pressure gradient.
    De Smet AA; Tetteroo E; Moll FL
    J Vasc Surg; 2000 Jul; 32(1):153-9. PubMed ID: 10876218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improved assessment of the hemodynamic significance of borderline iliac stenoses with use of hyperemic duplex scanning.
    Coffi SB; Ubbink DT; Zwiers I; van Gurp JA; Legemate DA
    J Vasc Surg; 2002 Sep; 36(3):575-80. PubMed ID: 12218984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A new noninvasive and patient-specific hemodynamic index for the severity of renal stenosis and outcome of interventional treatment.
    Yu H; Khan M; Wu H; Du X; Chen R; Rollins DM; Fang X; Long J; Xu C; Sawchuk AP
    Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2022 Jul; 38(7):e3611. PubMed ID: 35509229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Correlation of femoral artery flow velocity waveform with ipsilateral iliac artery stenoses assessed with magnetic resonance imaging.
    Wikström J; Johansson L; Karacagil S; Ahlström H
    Acta Radiol; 2007 May; 48(4):422-30. PubMed ID: 17453524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Uncertainty quantification in cerebral circulation simulations focusing on the collateral flow: Surrogate model approach with machine learning.
    Yuhn C; Oshima M; Chen Y; Hayakawa M; Yamada S
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2022 Jul; 18(7):e1009996. PubMed ID: 35867968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.