These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31514139)

  • 1. Why Visualize? Untangling a Large Network of Arguments.
    Streeb D; El-Assady M; Keim DA; Chen M
    IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2021 Mar; 27(3):2220-2236. PubMed ID: 31514139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Data by Proxy - Material Traces as Autographic Visualizations.
    Offenhuber D
    IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2020 Jan; 26(1):98-108. PubMed ID: 31443017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reasoning on conflicting information: An empirical study of Formal Argumentation.
    Guillaume M; Cramer M; van der Torre L; Schiltz C
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(8):e0273225. PubMed ID: 35984811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improving analytical reasoning and argument understanding: a quasi-experimental field study of argument visualization.
    Cullen S; Fan J; van der Brugge E; Elga A
    NPJ Sci Learn; 2018; 3():21. PubMed ID: 30631482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Scientific basis of the OCRA method for risk assessment of biomechanical overload of upper limb, as preferred method in ISO standards on biomechanical risk factors.
    Colombini D; Occhipinti E
    Scand J Work Environ Health; 2018 Jul; 44(4):436-438. PubMed ID: 29961081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fight the power: the limits of empiricism and the costs of positivistic rigor.
    Indick W
    J Psychol; 2002 Jan; 136(1):21-36. PubMed ID: 12022775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Argumentative Theory: Predictions and Empirical Evidence.
    Mercier H
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2016 Sep; 20(9):689-700. PubMed ID: 27450708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Toward an experimental account of argumentation: the case of the slippery slope and the ad hominem arguments.
    Lillo-Unglaube M; Canales-Johnson A; Navarrete G; Bravo CF
    Front Psychol; 2014; 5():1420. PubMed ID: 25566112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Social and Ethical Acceptability of NBICs for Purposes of Human Enhancement: Why Does the Debate Remain Mired in Impasse?
    Béland JP; Patenaude J; Legault GA; Boissy P; Parent M
    Nanoethics; 2011 Dec; 5(3):295-307. PubMed ID: 22247747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effectiveness of argumentation in tutorial dialogues with an Intelligent Tutoring System for genetic risk of breast cancer.
    Cedillos-Whynott EM; Wolfe CR; Widmer CL; Brust-Renck PG; Weil A; Reyna VF
    Behav Res Methods; 2016 Sep; 48(3):857-68. PubMed ID: 26511370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Design Space of Vision Science Methods for Visualization Research.
    Elliott MA; Nothelfer C; Xiong C; Szafir DA
    IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2021 Feb; 27(2):1117-1127. PubMed ID: 33090954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.
    Allen D; Gillen E; Rixson L
    JBI Libr Syst Rev; 2009; 7(3):80-129. PubMed ID: 27820426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory.
    Mercier H; Sperber D
    Behav Brain Sci; 2011 Apr; 34(2):57-74; discussion 74-111. PubMed ID: 21447233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Rethinking Giftedness and Gifted Education: A Proposed Direction Forward Based on Psychological Science.
    Subotnik RF; Olszewski-Kubilius P; Worrell FC
    Psychol Sci Public Interest; 2011 Jan; 12(1):3-54. PubMed ID: 26168418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A State-of-the-Art Survey of Tasks for Tree Design and Evaluation With a Curated Task Dataset.
    Pandey A; Syeda UH; Shah C; Guerra-Gomez JA; Borkin MA
    IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2022 Oct; 28(10):3563-3584. PubMed ID: 33667165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Argument Web: an Online Ecosystem of Tools, Systems and Services for Argumentation.
    Reed C; Budzynska K; Duthie R; Janier M; Konat B; Lawrence J; Pease A; Snaith M
    Philos Technol; 2017; 30(2):137-160. PubMed ID: 32025475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Children as Investigators of Brunerian "Possible Worlds". The Role of Narrative Scenarios in children's Argumentative Thinking.
    Iannaccone A; Perret-Clermont AN; Convertini J
    Integr Psychol Behav Sci; 2019 Dec; 53(4):679-693. PubMed ID: 31729627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A systematic method for surveying data visualizations and a resulting genomic epidemiology visualization typology: GEViT.
    Crisan A; Gardy JL; Munzner T
    Bioinformatics; 2019 May; 35(10):1668-1676. PubMed ID: 30256887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Annotating Argument Schemes.
    Visser J; Lawrence J; Reed C; Wagemans J; Walton D
    Argumentation; 2021; 35(1):101-139. PubMed ID: 33678987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Developing a Conversational Agent's Capability to Identify Structural Wrongness in Arguments Based on Toulmin's Model of Arguments.
    Mirzababaei B; Pammer-Schindler V
    Front Artif Intell; 2021; 4():645516. PubMed ID: 34927062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.