These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31514411)

  • 21. Accuracy of genotype imputation in sheep breeds.
    Hayes BJ; Bowman PJ; Daetwyler HD; Kijas JW; van der Werf JH
    Anim Genet; 2012 Feb; 43(1):72-80. PubMed ID: 22221027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Empirical and deterministic accuracies of across-population genomic prediction.
    Wientjes YC; Veerkamp RF; Bijma P; Bovenhuis H; Schrooten C; Calus MP
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Feb; 47(1):5. PubMed ID: 25885467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Genomic analysis for managing small and endangered populations: a case study in Tyrol Grey cattle.
    Mészáros G; Boison SA; Pérez O'Brien AM; Ferenčaković M; Curik I; Da Silva MV; Utsunomiya YT; Garcia JF; Sölkner J
    Front Genet; 2015; 6():173. PubMed ID: 26074948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Impact of genotyping strategy on the accuracy of genomic prediction in simulated populations of purebred swine.
    Li X; Zhang Z; Liu X; Chen Y
    Animal; 2019 Sep; 13(9):1804-1810. PubMed ID: 30616709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Genomic breeding value prediction: methods and procedures.
    Calus MP
    Animal; 2010 Feb; 4(2):157-64. PubMed ID: 22443868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Accuracy of genomic prediction when combining two related crossbred populations.
    Vallée A; van Arendonk JA; Bovenhuis H
    J Anim Sci; 2014 Oct; 92(10):4342-8. PubMed ID: 25149337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Impact of QTL properties on the accuracy of multi-breed genomic prediction.
    Wientjes YC; Calus MP; Goddard ME; Hayes BJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 May; 47(1):42. PubMed ID: 25951906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Which Individuals To Choose To Update the Reference Population? Minimizing the Loss of Genetic Diversity in Animal Genomic Selection Programs.
    Eynard SE; Croiseau P; Laloë D; Fritz S; Calus MPL; Restoux G
    G3 (Bethesda); 2018 Jan; 8(1):113-121. PubMed ID: 29133511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effects of marker density and population structure on the genomic prediction accuracy for growth trait in Pacific white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei.
    Wang Q; Yu Y; Yuan J; Zhang X; Huang H; Li F; Xiang J
    BMC Genet; 2017 May; 18(1):45. PubMed ID: 28514941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Components of the accuracy of genomic prediction in a multi-breed sheep population.
    Daetwyler HD; Kemper KE; van der Werf JH; Hayes BJ
    J Anim Sci; 2012 Oct; 90(10):3375-84. PubMed ID: 23038744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Including crossbred pigs in the genomic relationship matrix through utilization of both linkage disequilibrium and linkage analysis.
    Iversen MW; Nordbø Ø; Gjerlaug-Enger E; Grindflek E; Lopes MS; Meuwissen THE
    J Anim Sci; 2017 Dec; 95(12):5197-5207. PubMed ID: 29293760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A first step toward genomic selection in the multi-breed French dairy goat population.
    Carillier C; Larroque H; Palhière I; Clément V; Rupp R; Robert-Granié C
    J Dairy Sci; 2013; 96(11):7294-7305. PubMed ID: 24054303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Genomic predictions for economically important traits in Brazilian Braford and Hereford beef cattle using true and imputed genotypes.
    Piccoli ML; Brito LF; Braccini J; Cardoso FF; Sargolzaei M; Schenkel FS
    BMC Genet; 2017 Jan; 18(1):2. PubMed ID: 28100165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Genotype imputation from various low-density SNP panels and its impact on accuracy of genomic breeding values in pigs.
    Grossi DA; Brito LF; Jafarikia M; Schenkel FS; Feng Z
    Animal; 2018 Nov; 12(11):2235-2245. PubMed ID: 29706144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Optimizing the Construction and Update Strategies for the Genomic Selection of Pig Reference and Candidate Populations in China.
    Wei X; Zhang T; Wang L; Zhang L; Hou X; Yan H; Wang L
    Front Genet; 2022; 13():938947. PubMed ID: 35754832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. High-Throughput Sequencing With the Preselection of Markers Is a Good Alternative to SNP Chips for Genomic Prediction in Broilers.
    Liu T; Luo C; Ma J; Wang Y; Shu D; Su G; Qu H
    Front Genet; 2020; 11():108. PubMed ID: 32174971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Genomic prediction from observed and imputed high-density ovine genotypes.
    Moghaddar N; Swan AA; van der Werf JHJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Apr; 49(1):40. PubMed ID: 28427324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Prediction of the reliability of genomic breeding values for crossbred performance.
    Vandenplas J; Windig JJ; Calus MPL
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 May; 49(1):43. PubMed ID: 28499351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Reliability of direct genomic values for animals with different relationships within and to the reference population.
    Pszczola M; Strabel T; Mulder HA; Calus MP
    J Dairy Sci; 2012 Jan; 95(1):389-400. PubMed ID: 22192218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Accuracy of Predicted Genomic Breeding Values in Purebred and Crossbred Pigs.
    Hidalgo AM; Bastiaansen JW; Lopes MS; Harlizius B; Groenen MA; de Koning DJ
    G3 (Bethesda); 2015 May; 5(8):1575-83. PubMed ID: 26019187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.