These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

313 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31514580)

  • 1. New Paradigms in the Psychology of Reasoning.
    Oaksford M; Chater N
    Annu Rev Psychol; 2020 Jan; 71():305-330. PubMed ID: 31514580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Précis of bayesian rationality: The probabilistic approach to human reasoning.
    Oaksford M; Chater N
    Behav Brain Sci; 2009 Feb; 32(1):69-84; discussion 85-120. PubMed ID: 19210833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bayesian argumentation and the value of logical validity.
    Eva B; Hartmann S
    Psychol Rev; 2018 Oct; 125(5):806-821. PubMed ID: 30024177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The rationality of informal argumentation: a Bayesian approach to reasoning fallacies.
    Hahn U; Oaksford M
    Psychol Rev; 2007 Jul; 114(3):704-32. PubMed ID: 17638503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Bayesian approach to the argument from ignorance.
    Oaksford M; Hahn U
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2004 Jun; 58(2):75-85. PubMed ID: 15285597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The probability heuristics model of syllogistic reasoning.
    Chater N; Oaksford M
    Cogn Psychol; 1999 Mar; 38(2):191-258. PubMed ID: 10090803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Why is logic so likeable? A single-process account of argument evaluation with logic and liking judgments.
    Hayes BK; Wei P; Dunn JC; Stephens RG
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Apr; 46(4):699-719. PubMed ID: 31343253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Bayesian perspective on constructing a written assessment of probabilistic clinical reasoning in experienced clinicians.
    Kreiter CD
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2017 Feb; 23(1):44-48. PubMed ID: 26486941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Logic, Probability, and Pragmatics in Syllogistic Reasoning.
    Tessler MH; Tenenbaum JB; Goodman ND
    Top Cogn Sci; 2022 Jul; 14(3):574-601. PubMed ID: 35005842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Logic and human reasoning: an assessment of the deduction paradigm.
    Evans JS
    Psychol Bull; 2002 Nov; 128(6):978-96. PubMed ID: 12405140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Commentary: Are there good reasons to adopt dynamic systems approaches for explaining deductive reasoning?
    Leitão S
    Integr Psychol Behav Sci; 2008 Jun; 42(2):219-23. PubMed ID: 18478309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Rational hypocrisy: a Bayesian analysis based on informal argumentation and slippery slopes.
    Rai TS; Holyoak KJ
    Cogn Sci; 2014; 38(7):1456-67. PubMed ID: 24646370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Deductive and inductive reasoning in obsessive-compulsive disorder.
    Pélissier MC; O'Connor KP
    Br J Clin Psychol; 2002 Mar; 41(Pt 1):15-27. PubMed ID: 11931675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Everyday life reasoning, possible worlds and cultural processes.
    Smorti A
    Integr Psychol Behav Sci; 2008 Jun; 42(2):224-32. PubMed ID: 18210188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Modeling the effects of argument length and validity on inductive and deductive reasoning.
    Rotello CM; Heit E
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Sep; 35(5):1317-30. PubMed ID: 19686024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Logic, probability, and human reasoning.
    Johnson-Laird PN; Khemlani SS; Goodwin GP
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2015 Apr; 19(4):201-14. PubMed ID: 25770779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Possibilities as the foundation of reasoning.
    Johnson-Laird PN; Ragni M
    Cognition; 2019 Dec; 193():103950. PubMed ID: 31374514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Properties of inductive reasoning.
    Heit E
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2000 Dec; 7(4):569-92. PubMed ID: 11206199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The dimensionality of reasoning: Inductive and deductive inference can be explained by a single process.
    Hayes BK; Stephens RG; Ngo J; Dunn JC
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Sep; 44(9):1333-1351. PubMed ID: 29389195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An Argumentation-Based Analysis of the Simonshaven Case.
    Prakken H
    Top Cogn Sci; 2020 Oct; 12(4):1068-1091. PubMed ID: 30873711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.