168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31516263)
1. Cost-effectiveness of Sorafenib for Treatment of Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma in India.
Gupta N; Verma RK; Prinja S; Dhiman RK
J Clin Exp Hepatol; 2019; 9(4):468-475. PubMed ID: 31516263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost-effectiveness of sorafenib versus best supportive care in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in Egypt.
Hamdy Elsisi G; Nada Y; Rashad N; Carapinha J
J Med Econ; 2019 Feb; 22(2):163-168. PubMed ID: 30479174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Hepatic Arterial Infusion of FOLFOX Combined Sorafenib for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Portal Vein Invasion.
Li M; Lin S; Wilson L; Huang P; Wang H; Lai S; Dong L; Xu X; Weng X
Front Oncol; 2021; 11():562135. PubMed ID: 33767976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cost-effectiveness of sorafenib treatment in field practice for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.
Cammà C; Cabibbo G; Petta S; Enea M; Iavarone M; Grieco A; Gasbarrini A; Villa E; Zavaglia C; Bruno R; Colombo M; Craxì A; ;
Hepatology; 2013 Mar; 57(3):1046-54. PubMed ID: 23299720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cost-effectiveness analysis of antiviral therapy in patients with advanced hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma treated with sorafenib.
Zhang P; Yang Y; Wen F; Wheeler J; Fu P; Li Q
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2016 Dec; 31(12):1978-1985. PubMed ID: 27118432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cost-effectiveness analysis of Tislelizumab vs Sorafenib as the first-line treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.
Chen Q; Sun Q; Zhang J; Li B; Feng Q; Liu J
PLoS One; 2024; 19(3):e0295090. PubMed ID: 38437209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cost-effectiveness analysis of treatment with non-curative or palliative intent for hepatocellular carcinoma in the real-world setting.
Thein HH; Qiao Y; Zaheen A; Jembere N; Sapisochin G; Chan KKW; Yoshida EM; Earle CC
PLoS One; 2017; 12(10):e0185198. PubMed ID: 29016627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cost-Effectiveness of Sorafenib Monotherapy and Selected Combination Therapy with Sorafenib in Patients with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Ho JC; Hsieh ML; Chuang PH; Hsieh VC
Value Health Reg Issues; 2018 May; 15():120-126. PubMed ID: 29704658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sorafenib for the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.
Connock M; Round J; Bayliss S; Tubeuf S; Greenheld W; Moore D
Health Technol Assess; 2010 May; 14 Suppl 1():17-21. PubMed ID: 20507799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cost-effectiveness of Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab vs Sorafenib for Patients With Unresectable or Metastatic Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Zhang X; Wang J; Shi J; Jia X; Dang S; Wang W
JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Apr; 4(4):e214846. PubMed ID: 33825837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cost-Effectiveness of Cabozantinib in the Second-Line Treatment of Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Soto-Perez-de-Celis E; Aguiar PN; Cordón ML; Chavarri-Guerra Y; Lopes GL
J Natl Compr Canc Netw; 2019 Jun; 17(6):669-675. PubMed ID: 31200357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost-effectiveness analysis of sorafenib, lenvatinib, atezolizumab plus bevacizumab and sintilimab plus bevacizumab for the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in China.
Gong H; Ong SC; Li F; Weng Z; Zhao K; Jiang Z
Cost Eff Resour Alloc; 2023 Mar; 21(1):20. PubMed ID: 37004046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost-effectiveness analysis of cabozantinib as second-line therapy in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.
Liao W; Huang J; Hutton D; Zhu G; Wu Q; Wen F; Bai L; Li Q
Liver Int; 2019 Dec; 39(12):2408-2416. PubMed ID: 31544330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cost-effectiveness of sorafenib for second-line treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma.
Hoyle M; Green C; Thompson-Coon J; Liu Z; Welch K; Moxham T; Stein K
Value Health; 2010; 13(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 19804431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sorafenib versus Transarterial chemoembolization for advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Chen S; Peng Z; Wei M; Liu W; Dai Z; Wang H; Mei J; Cheong M; Zhang H; Kuang M
BMC Cancer; 2018 Apr; 18(1):392. PubMed ID: 29621988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cost-effectiveness of selective internal radiation therapy with Y-90 resin microspheres for intermediate- and advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma in Brazil.
Agirrezabal I; Pereira Grillo Junior LS; Nasser F; Brennan VK; Bugano D; Galastri FL; da-Silva ALFA; Shergill S; da Motta-Leal-Filho JM
J Med Econ; 2023; 26(1):731-741. PubMed ID: 37139828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cost-effectiveness of Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab vs Sorafenib as First-Line Treatment of Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Su D; Wu B; Shi L
JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Feb; 4(2):e210037. PubMed ID: 33625508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Nivolumab Versus Sorafenib as First-Line Therapy for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
Li Y; Liang X; Li H; Yang T; Guo S; Chen X
Front Pharmacol; 2022; 13():906956. PubMed ID: 35928269
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Selective Internal Radiotherapy With Yttrium-90 Versus Sorafenib in Locally Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Marqueen KE; Kim E; Ang C; Mazumdar M; Buckstein M; Ferket BS
JCO Oncol Pract; 2021 Feb; 17(2):e266-e277. PubMed ID: 33417490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cost-effectiveness of sorafenib versus SBRT for unresectable advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.
Leung HW; Liu CF; Chan AL
Radiat Oncol; 2016 May; 11():69. PubMed ID: 27193904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
