156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31516662)
21. [Occlusion variation of posterior implant-supported single crown: a prospective 4-year follow-up study].
Ding Q; Luo Q; Li XL; Zhang L; Xie QF
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2021 Mar; 56(3):244-250. PubMed ID: 33663153
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Analyzing the occlusion variation of single posterior implant-supported fixed prostheses by using the T-scan system: A prospective 3-year follow-up study.
Luo Q; Ding Q; Zhang L; Xie Q
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jan; 123(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 31079880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Passive tactile sensibility of teeth and osseointegrated dental implants in the maxilla.
Grieznis L; Apse P; Blumfelds L
Stomatologija; 2010; 12(3):80-6. PubMed ID: 21063137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. An In Vivo Study on Load Distribution in Different Implant Configurations for Supporting Fixed Partial Dentures.
Kobari H; Yoda N; Chen J; Kawata T; Sasaki K
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(5):1049-57. PubMed ID: 27632259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Survival and complication rates of fixed partial dentures supported by a combination of teeth and implants.
Weber HP; Zimering Y
J Evid Based Dent Pract; 2012 Sep; 12(3 Suppl):215-6. PubMed ID: 23253849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Survival and complication rates of fixed partial dentures supported by a combination of teeth and implants.
Weber HP; Zimering Y
J Evid Based Dent Pract; 2010 Mar; 10(1):58-60. PubMed ID: 20230973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Influence of the supporting structure on stress distribution in all-ceramic FPDs.
Dittmer MP; Kohorst P; Borchers L; Stiesch M
Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(1):63-8. PubMed ID: 20234896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparisons of tactile thresholds between implant-supported fixed partial dentures and removable partial dentures.
Garrett NR; Hasse AL; Kapur KK
Int J Prosthodont; 1992; 5(6):515-22. PubMed ID: 1307010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Evaluation of active tactile sensibility in a single-tooth implant opposing a natural tooth with either an immediate or delayed functional loading protocol: A parallel design clinical study.
Deepika K; Bhatnagar A; Singh A; Soni R
J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Jan; ():. PubMed ID: 36621356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Influence of fixation mode and superstructure span upon strain development of implant fixed partial dentures.
Karl M; Wichmann MG; Winter W; Graef F; Taylor TD; Heckmann SM
J Prosthodont; 2008 Jan; 17(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 17927737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. In vivo measurements of some functional aspects with mandibular fixed prostheses supported by implants.
Mericske-Stern R; Zarb GA
Clin Oral Implants Res; 1996 Jun; 7(2):153-61. PubMed ID: 9002834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Progressive recovery of osseoperception as a function of the combination of implant-supported prostheses.
Batista M; Bonachela W; Soares J
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Jun; 19(6):565-9. PubMed ID: 18422982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Evaluation of stress induced by implant type, number of splinted teeth, and variations in periodontal support in tooth-implant-supported fixed partial dentures: a non-linear finite element analysis.
Lin CL; Wang JC; Chang SH; Chen ST
J Periodontol; 2010 Jan; 81(1):121-30. PubMed ID: 20059424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparative evaluation of the oral tactile function by means of teeth or implant-supported prostheses.
Jacobs R; van Steenberghe D
Clin Oral Implants Res; 1991; 2(2):75-80. PubMed ID: 1809402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [The effect of pontic occlusal form on abutment tooth displacement].
Shinki T
Kokubyo Gakkai Zasshi; 2003 Mar; 70(1):19-31. PubMed ID: 12708029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Nonlinear finite element analysis of a splinted implant with various connectors and occlusal forces.
Lin CL; Wang JC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(3):331-40. PubMed ID: 12814307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Osseoperception in Dental Implants: A Systematic Review.
Mishra SK; Chowdhary R; Chrcanovic BR; Brånemark PI
J Prosthodont; 2016 Apr; 25(3):185-95. PubMed ID: 26823228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Post-insertion Posterior Single-implant Occlusion Changes at Different Intervals: A T-Scan Computerized Occlusal Analysis.
Madani AS; Nakhaei M; Alami M; Haghi HR; Moazzami SM
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Oct; 18(10):927-932. PubMed ID: 28989132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Finite element analysis of implant-supported prosthesis with pontic and cantilever in the posterior maxilla.
de Souza Batista VE; Verri FR; Almeida DA; Santiago Junior JF; Lemos CA; Pellizzer EP
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2017 May; 20(6):663-670. PubMed ID: 28349769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Osseoperception: active tactile sensibility of osseointegrated dental implants.
Enkling N; Utz KH; Bayer S; Stern RM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(6):1159-67. PubMed ID: 21197493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
