These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31516664)

  • 1. Miniscrew-supported distal jet versus conventional distal jet appliance: A pilot study.
    Cassetta M; Brandetti G; Altieri F
    J Clin Exp Dent; 2019 Jul; 11(7):e650-e658. PubMed ID: 31516664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparing Distal-Jet with Dental Anchorage to Distal-Jet with Skeletal Anchorage: A Prospective Parallel Cohort Study.
    Altieri F; Mezio M; Guarnieri R; Cassetta M
    Dent J (Basel); 2022 Sep; 10(10):. PubMed ID: 36285989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Efficiency of a skeletonized distal jet appliance supported by miniscrew anchorage for noncompliance maxillary molar distalization.
    Kinzinger GS; Gülden N; Yildizhan F; Diedrich PR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Oct; 136(4):578-86. PubMed ID: 19815162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of two intraoral molar distalization appliances: distal jet versus pendulum.
    Chiu PP; McNamara JA; Franchi L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Sep; 128(3):353-65. PubMed ID: 16168332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of maxillary molar distalization with an implant-supported distal jet and a traditional tooth-supported distal jet appliance.
    Cozzani M; Pasini M; Zallio F; Ritucci R; Mutinelli S; Mazzotta L; Giuca MR; Piras V
    Int J Dent; 2014; 2014():937059. PubMed ID: 25018770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of maxillary molar distalization with the distal jet: a comparison with other contemporary methods.
    Bolla E; Muratore F; Carano A; Bowman SJ
    Angle Orthod; 2002 Oct; 72(5):481-94. PubMed ID: 12401059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effectiveness of pendulum, K-loop, and distal jet distalization techniques in growing children and its effects on anchor unit: A comparative study.
    Marure PS; Patil RU; Reddy S; Prakash A; Kshetrimayum N; Shukla R
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2016; 34(4):331-40. PubMed ID: 27681396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Anchorage efficacy of palatally-inserted miniscrews in molar distalization with a periodontally/miniscrew-anchored distal jet.
    Kinzinger G; Gülden N; Yildizhan F; Hermanns-Sachweh B; Diedrich P
    J Orofac Orthop; 2008 Mar; 69(2):110-20. PubMed ID: 18385957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Class II malocclusion treatment changes with the Jones jig, Distal jet and First Class appliances.
    Vilanova L; Henriques JFC; Patel MP; Reis RS; Grec RHDC; Aliaga-Del Castillo A; Bellini-Pereira SA; Janson G
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2020; 28():e20190364. PubMed ID: 32348442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Maxillary molar distalization with the indirect Palatal miniscrew for Anchorage and Distalization Appliance (iPANDA).
    Suzuki EY; Suzuki B
    Orthodontics (Chic.); 2013; 14(1):e228-41. PubMed ID: 23646335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of K-loop Molar Distalization with that of Pendulum Appliance - A Prospective Comparative Study.
    Shashidhar NR; Reddy SR; Rachala MR
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2016 Jun; 10(6):ZC20-3. PubMed ID: 27504403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of two maxillary molar distalizing appliances with the distal jet.
    Ferguson DJ; Carano A; Bowman SJ; Davis EC; Gutierrez Vega ME; Lee SH
    World J Orthod; 2005; 6(4):382-90. PubMed ID: 16379210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dental, skeletal and soft tissue effects of the Distal Jet appliance: A prospective clinical study.
    Reis RS; Henriques JFC; Janson G; Freitas KMS; Moura W
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2019; 24(6):56-64. PubMed ID: 31994647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of Dentoalveolar and Dentofacial Effects of a Mini-Screw-Anchored Pendulum Appliance in Maxillary Molar Distalization.
    Kırcalı M; Yüksel AS
    Turk J Orthod; 2018 Dec; 31(4):103-109. PubMed ID: 30701219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Treatment effects of intraoral appliances with conventional anchorage designs for non-compliance maxillary molar distalization: a literature review.
    Kinzinger GS; Eren M; Diedrich PR
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Dec; 30(6):558-71. PubMed ID: 18820306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of the effects of the hybrid Pendulum in comparison with the conventional Pendulum appliance.
    Bozkaya E; Tortop T; Yüksel S; Kaygısız E
    Angle Orthod; 2020 Mar; 90(2):194-201. PubMed ID: 31642688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Maxillary molar distalization in treatment of angle class II malocclusion growing patients: Uncontrolled clinical trial.
    Abdelhady NA; Tawfik MA; Hammad SM
    Int Orthod; 2020 Mar; 18(1):96-104. PubMed ID: 31974060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Changes consequent to maxillary molar distalization with the bone-anchored pendulum appliance.
    Cambiano AO; Janson G; Fuziy A; Garib DG; Lorenzoni DC
    J Orthod Sci; 2017; 6(4):141-146. PubMed ID: 29119095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intraoral Molar Distalization with Intraosseous Mini Screw.
    Amasyalı M; Sabuncuoğlu FA; Oflaz U
    Turk J Orthod; 2018 Mar; 31(1):26-30. PubMed ID: 30112510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Maxillary molar distalization: Pendulum and Fast-Back, comparison between two approaches for Class II malocclusion.
    Caprioglio A; Beretta M; Lanteri C
    Prog Orthod; 2011; 12(1):8-16. PubMed ID: 21515227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.