These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31517185)

  • 1. Pupil Dilation Reflects Task Relevance Prior to Search.
    Olmos-Solis K; van Loon AM; Olivers CNL
    J Cogn; 2018 Jan; 1(1):11. PubMed ID: 31517185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Subtle eye movement metrics reveal task-relevant representations prior to visual search.
    van Loon AM; Olmos-Solis K; Olivers CNL
    J Vis; 2017 Jun; 17(6):13. PubMed ID: 28637052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Involuntary top-down control by search-irrelevant features: Visual working memory biases attention in an object-based manner.
    Foerster RM; Schneider WX
    Cognition; 2018 Mar; 172():37-45. PubMed ID: 29223864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Priming and the guidance by visual and categorical templates in visual search.
    Wilschut A; Theeuwes J; Olivers CN
    Front Psychol; 2014; 5():148. PubMed ID: 24605105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Oculomotor measures reveal the temporal dynamics of preparing for search.
    Olmos-Solis K; van Loon AM; Los SA; Olivers CNL
    Prog Brain Res; 2017; 236():1-23. PubMed ID: 29157407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interactions Between Visual Working Memory, Attention, and Color Categories: A Pupillometry Study.
    Wilschut T; Mathôt S
    J Cogn; 2022; 5(1):16. PubMed ID: 36072094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Task-Irrelevant Features in Visual Working Memory Influence Covert Attention: Evidence from a Partial Report Task.
    Foerster RM; Schneider WX
    Vision (Basel); 2019 Aug; 3(3):. PubMed ID: 31735843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Multiple representations in visual working memory simultaneously guide attention: The type of memory-matching representation matters.
    Fan L; Sun M; Xu M; Li Z; Diao L; Zhang X
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Jan; 192():126-137. PubMed ID: 30471521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Time Course of Target Template Activation Processes during Preparation for Visual Search.
    Grubert A; Eimer M
    J Neurosci; 2018 Oct; 38(44):9527-9538. PubMed ID: 30242053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Visual working memory simultaneously guides facilitation and inhibition during visual search.
    Dube B; Basciano A; Emrich SM; Al-Aidroos N
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Jul; 78(5):1232-44. PubMed ID: 27055458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Object features reinstated from episodic memory guide attentional selection.
    Kerzel D; Andres MK
    Cognition; 2020 Apr; 197():104158. PubMed ID: 31986352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pre-stimulus pupil dilation and the preparatory control of attention.
    Irons JL; Jeon M; Leber AB
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(12):e0188787. PubMed ID: 29220361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Visual mental imagery influences attentional guidance in a visual-search task.
    Moriya J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Jul; 80(5):1127-1142. PubMed ID: 29654532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparing the temporal dynamics and efficacy of task-relevant and task-irrelevant memory-driven attention.
    Jung K; Han SW; Min Y
    Cogn Process; 2022 May; 23(2):299-308. PubMed ID: 35001208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Visual Working Memory Enhances the Neural Response to Matching Visual Input.
    Gayet S; Guggenmos M; Christophel TB; Haynes JD; Paffen CLE; Van der Stigchel S; Sterzer P
    J Neurosci; 2017 Jul; 37(28):6638-6647. PubMed ID: 28592696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The precision of attentional selection is far worse than the precision of the underlying memory representation.
    Kerzel D
    Cognition; 2019 May; 186():20-31. PubMed ID: 30739056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Visual Working Memory Load Disrupts Template-guided Attentional Selection during Visual Search.
    Berggren N; Eimer M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2018 Dec; 30(12):1902-1915. PubMed ID: 30125222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Preparatory Template Activation during Search for Alternating Targets.
    Grubert A; Eimer M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2020 Aug; 32(8):1525-1535. PubMed ID: 32319869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Concurrent guidance of attention by multiple working memory items: Behavioral and computational evidence.
    Zhou C; Lorist MM; Mathôt S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Aug; 82(6):2950-2962. PubMed ID: 32394070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Involuntary attentional capture by task-irrelevant objects that match the search template for category detection in natural scenes.
    Reeder RR; van Zoest W; Peelen MV
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 May; 77(4):1070-80. PubMed ID: 25810159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.