These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31517213)

  • 1. A Word on Words in Words: How Do Embedded Words Affect Reading?
    Snell J; Grainger J; Declerck M
    J Cogn; 2018 Sep; 1(1):40. PubMed ID: 31517213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Word-Initial Letters Influence Fixation Durations during Fluent Reading.
    Hand CJ; O'Donnell PJ; Sereno SC
    Front Psychol; 2012; 3():85. PubMed ID: 22485100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An eye movement corpus study of the age-of-acquisition effect.
    Dirix N; Duyck W
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Dec; 24(6):1915-1921. PubMed ID: 28116701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The orthographic uniqueness point and eye movements during reading.
    Miller B; Juhasz BJ; Rayner K
    Br J Psychol; 2006 May; 97(Pt 2):191-216. PubMed ID: 16613649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Emotion words affect eye fixations during reading.
    Scott GG; O'Donnell PJ; Sereno SC
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 May; 38(3):783-92. PubMed ID: 22329788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Investigating word length effects in Chinese reading.
    Zang C; Fu Y; Bai X; Yan G; Liversedge SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Dec; 44(12):1831-1841. PubMed ID: 30475051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An inhibitory influence of transposed-letter neighbors on eye movements during reading.
    Pagán A; Paterson KB; Blythe HI; Liversedge SP
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Feb; 23(1):278-84. PubMed ID: 26032225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of increased letter spacing on word identification and eye guidance during reading.
    Paterson KB; Jordan TR
    Mem Cognit; 2010 Jun; 38(4):502-12. PubMed ID: 20516230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Does omitting the accent mark in a word affect sentence reading? Evidence from Spanish.
    Marcet A; Perea M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2022 Jan; 75(1):148-155. PubMed ID: 34427486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. On the segmentation of Chinese incremental words.
    Zhou J; Li X
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2021 Aug; 47(8):1353-1368. PubMed ID: 33523693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Lexical access during eye fixations in reading: effects of word-initial letter sequence.
    Lima SD; Inhoff AW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1985 Jun; 11(3):272-85. PubMed ID: 3159838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Lexical processing and text integration of function and content words: evidence from priming and eye fixations.
    Schmauder AR; Morris RK; Poynor DV
    Mem Cognit; 2000 Oct; 28(7):1098-108. PubMed ID: 11126934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Lexical embeddings produce interference when they are morphologically unrelated to the words in which they are contained: Evidence from eye movements.
    Weingartner KM; Juhasz BJ; Rayner K
    J Cogn Psychol (Hove); 2012; 24(2):179-188. PubMed ID: 22900139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How strongly do word reading times and lexical decision times correlate? Combining data from eye movement corpora and megastudies.
    Kuperman V; Drieghe D; Keuleers E; Brysbaert M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(3):563-80. PubMed ID: 22524868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [The influence of visualization of orthography on the recognition of written words].
    Mathey S
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2001 Mar; 55(1):1-23. PubMed ID: 11301725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Word skipping during the lexical acquisition process.
    Eskenazi MA; Kemp P; Folk JR
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2021 Mar; 74(3):548-558. PubMed ID: 33135575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effects of root frequency, word frequency, and length on the processing of prefixed English words during reading.
    Niswander-Klement E; Pollatsek A
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Apr; 34(3):685-702. PubMed ID: 16933774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. CompLex: an eye-movement database of compound word reading in English.
    Schmidtke D; Van Dyke JA; Kuperman V
    Behav Res Methods; 2021 Feb; 53(1):59-77. PubMed ID: 32572845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An Investigation into the Processing of Lexicalized English Blend Words: Evidence from Lexical Decisions and Eye Movements During Reading.
    Juhasz BJ; Johnson RL; Brewer J
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2017 Apr; 46(2):281-294. PubMed ID: 27246520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How do readers know where to look next? Local information distributions influence eye fixations.
    Underwood G; Clews S; Everatt J
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1990 Feb; 42(1):39-65. PubMed ID: 2326490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.