188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31517215)
1. Cues to Lying May be Deceptive: Speaker and Listener Behaviour in an Interactive Game of Deception.
Loy JE; Rohde H; Corley M
J Cogn; 2018 Sep; 1(1):42. PubMed ID: 31517215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Interpreting nonverbal cues to deception in real time.
King JPJ; Loy JE; Rohde H; Corley M
PLoS One; 2020; 15(3):e0229486. PubMed ID: 32150573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intelligibility of dysarthric speech: perceptions of speakers and listeners.
Walshe M; Miller N; Leahy M; Murray A
Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2008; 43(6):633-48. PubMed ID: 18608608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of Disfluency in Online Interpretation of Deception.
Loy JE; Rohde H; Corley M
Cogn Sci; 2017 May; 41 Suppl 6():1434-1456. PubMed ID: 27246116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Listeners' Perceptions of Speaker Personality Traits Based on Speech.
Welch B; van Mersbergen MR; Helou LB
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2021 Dec; 64(12):4762-4771. PubMed ID: 34731579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. I know what you're probably going to say: Listener adaptation to variable use of uncertainty expressions.
Schuster S; Degen J
Cognition; 2020 Oct; 203():104285. PubMed ID: 32535344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Gesturing during disfluent speech: A pragmatic account.
Kısa YD; Goldin-Meadow S; Casasanto D
Cognition; 2024 Jun; 250():105855. PubMed ID: 38865912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Looking to understand: the coupling between speakers' and listeners' eye movements and its relationship to discourse comprehension.
Richardson DC; Dale R
Cogn Sci; 2005 Nov; 29(6):1045-60. PubMed ID: 21702802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Speech With Pauses Sounds Deceptive to Listeners With and Without Hearing Impairment.
Patel B; Zhang Z; McGettigan C; Belyk M
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2023 Oct; 66(10):3735-3744. PubMed ID: 37672786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. On how the brain decodes vocal cues about speaker confidence.
Jiang X; Pell MD
Cortex; 2015 May; 66():9-34. PubMed ID: 25796072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Speaker-listener neural coupling underlies successful communication.
Stephens GJ; Silbert LJ; Hasson U
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2010 Aug; 107(32):14425-30. PubMed ID: 20660768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. SPEAKERS' AND LISTENERS' PROCESSES IN A WORD-COMMUNICATION TASK.
ROSENBERG S; COHEN BD
Science; 1964 Sep; 145(3637):1201-3. PubMed ID: 14173413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The communicative style of a speaker can affect language comprehension? ERP evidence from the comprehension of irony.
Regel S; Coulson S; Gunter TC
Brain Res; 2010 Jan; 1311():121-35. PubMed ID: 19900421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Listener perceptions along a fluency--disfluency continuum: a phenomenological analysis.
Susca M; Healey EC
J Fluency Disord; 2002; 27(2):135-60; quiz 160-1. PubMed ID: 12145983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Perception of pitch location within a speaker's range: fundamental frequency, voice quality and speaker sex.
Bishop J; Keating P
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):1100-12. PubMed ID: 22894229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Utilization of visual information and listener strategies in intelligibility impairment related to bilateral facial paresis.
Keintz C
Int J Speech Lang Pathol; 2011 Dec; 13(6):510-7. PubMed ID: 21682545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Expectations about the source of a speaker's accent affect accent adaptation.
Vaughn CR
J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 May; 145(5):3218. PubMed ID: 31153344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The artful dodger: answering the wrong question the right way.
Rogers T; Norton MI
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2011 Jun; 17(2):139-47. PubMed ID: 21517203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Privileged versus shared knowledge about object identity in real-time referential processing.
Mozuraitis M; Chambers CG; Daneman M
Cognition; 2015 Sep; 142():148-65. PubMed ID: 26048297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. This Better Be Interesting: A Speaker's Decision to Speak Cues Listeners to Expect Informative Content.
Rohde H; Hoek J; Keshev M; Franke M
Open Mind (Camb); 2022; 6():118-131. PubMed ID: 36439071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
