220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31519112)
1. Comparison of the Word Memory Test and the Test of Memory Malingering in detecting invalid performance in neuropsychological testing.
Bhowmick C; Hirst R; Green P
Appl Neuropsychol Adult; 2021; 28(4):486-496. PubMed ID: 31519112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Not all performance validity tests are created equal: The role of recollection and familiarity in the Test of Memory Malingering and Word Memory Test.
Eglit GM; Lynch JK; McCaffrey RJ
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2017 Mar; 39(2):173-189. PubMed ID: 27501116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Performance on the Test of Memory Malingering is predicted by the number of errors on its first 10 items on an inpatient epilepsy monitoring unit.
Grabyan JM; Collins RL; Alverson WA; Chen DK
Clin Neuropsychol; 2018 Apr; 32(3):468-478. PubMed ID: 28826306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Test of memory malingering and word memory test: a new comparison of failure concordance rates.
Greiffenstein MF; Greve KW; Bianchini KJ; Baker WJ
Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2008; 23(7-8):801-7. PubMed ID: 18783912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical utility of the Rey 15-Item Test, recognition trial, and error scores for detecting noncredible neuropsychological performance in a mixed clinical sample of veterans.
Bailey KC; Soble JR; O'Rourke JJF
Clin Neuropsychol; 2018 Jan; 32(1):119-131. PubMed ID: 28555516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Minimizing evaluation time while maintaining accuracy: Cross-validation of the Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM) Trial 1 and first 10-item errors as briefer performance validity tests.
Kraemer LDR; Soble JR; Phillips JI; Webber TA; Fullen CT; Highsmith JM; Alverson WA; Critchfield EA
Psychol Assess; 2020 May; 32(5):442-450. PubMed ID: 32027161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A pilot study on the adequacy of the TOMM in detecting invalid performance in patients with substance use disorders.
Vilar-López R; Daugherty JC; Pérez-García M; Piñón-Blanco A
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2021 Apr; 43(3):255-263. PubMed ID: 33855936
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of the classification accuracy of multiple performance validity tests in a mixed clinical sample.
Messerly J; Soble JR; Webber TA; Alverson WA; Fullen C; Kraemer LD; Marceaux JC
Appl Neuropsychol Adult; 2021; 28(6):727-736. PubMed ID: 31835915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of WMT, CARB, and TOMM failure rates in non-head injury disability claimants.
Gervais RO; Rohling ML; Green P; Ford W
Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2004 Jun; 19(4):475-87. PubMed ID: 15163449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cross-validation of the Invalid Forgetting Frequency Index (IFFI) from the Test of Memory Malingering.
Olsen DH; Schroeder RW; Martin PK
Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2021 Apr; 36(3):437-441. PubMed ID: 31792528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Stratified performance on the Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM) is associated with differential responding on the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI).
Whiteside DM; Hunt I; Choate A; Caraher K; Basso MR
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2020 Mar; 42(2):131-141. PubMed ID: 31771455
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The Albany Consistency Index for the Test of Memory Malingering.
Gunner JH; Miele AS; Lynch JK; McCaffrey RJ
Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2012 Jan; 27(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 22107827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparing the Independent and Aggregated Accuracy of Trial 1 and the First 10 TOMM Items for Detecting Invalid Neuropsychological Test Performance Across Civilian and Veteran Clinical Samples.
Soble JR; Cerny BM; Ovsiew GP; Rhoads T; Reynolds TP; Sharp DW; Jennette KJ; Marceaux JC; O'Rourke JJF; Critchfield EA; Resch ZJ
Percept Mot Skills; 2022 Apr; 129(2):269-288. PubMed ID: 35139315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Embedded assessment of validity using the continuous visual memory test in patients with traumatic brain injury.
Krishnan M; Donders J
Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2011 Apr; 26(3):176-83. PubMed ID: 21355004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Normal cognitive test scores cannot be interpreted as accurate measures of ability in the context of failed performance validity testing: A symptom- and detection-coached simulation study.
Martinez KA; Sayers C; Hayes C; Martin PK; Clark CB; Schroeder RW
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2021 Apr; 43(3):301-309. PubMed ID: 33998369
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Use of multiple performance and symptom validity measures: Determining the optimal per test cutoff for determination of invalidity, analysis of skew, and inter-test correlations in valid and invalid performance groups.
Larrabee GJ; Rohling ML; Meyers JE
Clin Neuropsychol; 2019 Nov; 33(8):1354-1372. PubMed ID: 31111775
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of criterion measures on the classification accuracy of TOMM-1.
Rai JK; Erdodi LA
Appl Neuropsychol Adult; 2021; 28(2):185-196. PubMed ID: 31187632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of performance of the test of memory malingering and word memory test in a criminal forensic sample.
Fazio RL; Sanders JF; Denney RL
Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2015 Jun; 30(4):293-301. PubMed ID: 25948293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Visual Association Test-Extended: a cross-sectional study of the performance validity measures.
Meyer SR; de Jonghe JF; Schmand B; Ponds RW
Clin Neuropsychol; 2017 May; 31(4):798-813. PubMed ID: 28156190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. TOMM Trial 1 as a performance validity indicator in a criminal forensic sample.
Fazio RL; Denning JH; Denney RL
Clin Neuropsychol; 2017 Jan; 31(1):251-267. PubMed ID: 27456971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
