210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31519176)
1. Comparison of efficacy of robotic surgery, laparoscopy, and laparotomy in the treatment of ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis.
Shi C; Gao Y; Yang Y; Zhang L; Yu J; Zhang T
World J Surg Oncol; 2019 Sep; 17(1):162. PubMed ID: 31519176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A Meta-Analysis of Robotic Surgery in Endometrial Cancer: Comparison with Laparoscopy and Laparotomy.
Wang J; Li X; Wu H; Zhang Y; Wang F
Dis Markers; 2020; 2020():2503753. PubMed ID: 32454902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mini-invasive
Ye SP; Qiu H; Liao SJ; Ai JH; Shi J
World J Gastroenterol; 2019 Jun; 25(22):2819-2832. PubMed ID: 31236004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of robotic surgery with laparoscopy and laparotomy for treatment of endometrial cancer: a meta-analysis.
Ran L; Jin J; Xu Y; Bu Y; Song F
PLoS One; 2014; 9(9):e108361. PubMed ID: 25259856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of the prognosis and recurrence of apparent early-stage ovarian tumors treated with laparoscopy and laparotomy: a meta-analysis of clinical studies.
Zhang Y; Fan S; Xiang Y; Duan H; Sun L
BMC Cancer; 2015 Aug; 15():597. PubMed ID: 26307038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Efficacy of robotic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer compared with that of open and laparoscopic surgery: A separate meta-analysis of high-quality studies.
Zhang SS; Ding T; Cui ZH; Lv Y; Jiang RA
Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Jan; 98(4):e14171. PubMed ID: 30681582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of robotic approach, laparoscopic approach and laparotomy in treating epithelial ovarian cancer.
Chen CH; Chiu LH; Chen HH; Chan C; Liu WM
Int J Med Robot; 2016 Jun; 12(2):268-75. PubMed ID: 25808671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the management of early stage endometrial cancer.
Galaal K; Donkers H; Bryant A; Lopes AD
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2018 Oct; 10(10):CD006655. PubMed ID: 30379327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Perioperative and Survival Outcomes of Robotic-Assisted Surgery, Comparison with Laparoscopy and Laparotomy, for Ovarian Cancer: A Network Meta-Analysis.
Tang Q; Liu W; Jiang D; Tang J; Zhou Q; Zhang J
J Oncol; 2022; 2022():2084774. PubMed ID: 35535312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Robotic interval debulking surgery for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: current challenge or future direction? A systematic review.
Psomiadou V; Prodromidou A; Fotiou A; Lekka S; Iavazzo C
J Robot Surg; 2021 Apr; 15(2):155-163. PubMed ID: 33037532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Minimally invasive interval cytoreductive surgery in ovarian cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Cardenas-Goicoechea J; Wang Y; McGorray S; Saleem MD; Carbajal Mamani SL; Pomputius AF; Markham MJ; Castagno JC
J Robot Surg; 2019 Feb; 13(1):23-33. PubMed ID: 29992404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for benign ovarian tumor: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Medeiros LR; Stein AT; Fachel J; Garry R; Furness S
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2008; 18(3):387-99. PubMed ID: 17692084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A meta-analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic colectomy.
Chang YS; Wang JX; Chang DW
J Surg Res; 2015 May; 195(2):465-74. PubMed ID: 25770742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Survival outcomes for robotic-assisted laparoscopy versus traditional laparoscopy in clinical stage I epithelial ovarian cancer.
Facer B; Wang F; Grijalva CG; Alvarez RD; Shu XO
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 May; 222(5):474.e1-474.e12. PubMed ID: 31715149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Minimally invasive surgical techniques versus open myomectomy for uterine fibroids.
Bhave Chittawar P; Franik S; Pouwer AW; Farquhar C
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Oct; 2014(10):CD004638. PubMed ID: 25331441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of clinical and economic outcomes between robotic, laparoscopic, and open rectal cancer surgery: early experience at a tertiary care center.
Ramji KM; Cleghorn MC; Josse JM; MacNeill A; O'Brien C; Urbach D; Quereshy FA
Surg Endosc; 2016 Apr; 30(4):1337-43. PubMed ID: 26173546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Robot-assisted thoracic surgery versus video-assisted thoracic surgery for lung lobectomy or segmentectomy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis.
Ma J; Li X; Zhao S; Wang J; Zhang W; Sun G
BMC Cancer; 2021 May; 21(1):498. PubMed ID: 33941112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Robotic surgery: disruptive innovation or unfulfilled promise? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the first 30 years.
Tan A; Ashrafian H; Scott AJ; Mason SE; Harling L; Athanasiou T; Darzi A
Surg Endosc; 2016 Oct; 30(10):4330-52. PubMed ID: 26895896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative safety and effectiveness of robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopy and laparotomy for endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Park DA; Lee DH; Kim SW; Lee SH
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2016 Sep; 42(9):1303-14. PubMed ID: 27439723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
