263 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31520277)
1. A Multi-million Mammography Image Dataset and Population-Based Screening Cohort for the Training and Evaluation of Deep Neural Networks-the Cohort of Screen-Aged Women (CSAW).
Dembrower K; Lindholm P; Strand F
J Digit Imaging; 2020 Apr; 33(2):408-413. PubMed ID: 31520277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. One-view breast tomosynthesis versus two-view mammography in the Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial (MBTST): a prospective, population-based, diagnostic accuracy study.
Zackrisson S; Lång K; Rosso A; Johnson K; Dustler M; Förnvik D; Förnvik H; Sartor H; Timberg P; Tingberg A; Andersson I
Lancet Oncol; 2018 Nov; 19(11):1493-1503. PubMed ID: 30322817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of a Four-View Mammographic Image Feature Based Fusion Model to Predict Near-Term Breast Cancer Risk.
Tan M; Pu J; Cheng S; Liu H; Zheng B
Ann Biomed Eng; 2015 Oct; 43(10):2416-28. PubMed ID: 25851469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Deep Learning to Distinguish Recalled but Benign Mammography Images in Breast Cancer Screening.
Aboutalib SS; Mohamed AA; Berg WA; Zuley ML; Sumkin JH; Wu S
Clin Cancer Res; 2018 Dec; 24(23):5902-5909. PubMed ID: 30309858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessing breast cancer risk within the general screening population: developing a breast cancer risk model to identify higher risk women at mammographic screening.
Abdolell M; Payne JI; Caines J; Tsuruda K; Barnes PJ; Talbot PJ; Tong O; Brown P; Rivers-Bowerman M; Iles S
Eur Radiol; 2020 Oct; 30(10):5417-5426. PubMed ID: 32358648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Responding to the challenges of breast cancer in egypt and other arab countries.
El Saghir NS
J Egypt Natl Canc Inst; 2008 Dec; 20(4):309-12. PubMed ID: 20571588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of artificial intelligence-based triaging of breast cancer screening mammograms on cancer detection and radiologist workload: a retrospective simulation study.
Dembrower K; Wåhlin E; Liu Y; Salim M; Smith K; Lindholm P; Eklund M; Strand F
Lancet Digit Health; 2020 Sep; 2(9):e468-e474. PubMed ID: 33328114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Novel mammographic image features differentiate between interval and screen-detected breast cancer: a case-case study.
Strand F; Humphreys K; Cheddad A; Törnberg S; Azavedo E; Shepherd J; Hall P; Czene K
Breast Cancer Res; 2016 Oct; 18(1):100. PubMed ID: 27716311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A High-Performance Deep Neural Network Model for BI-RADS Classification of Screening Mammography.
Tsai KJ; Chou MC; Li HM; Liu ST; Hsu JH; Yeh WC; Hung CM; Yeh CY; Hwang SH
Sensors (Basel); 2022 Feb; 22(3):. PubMed ID: 35161903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Breast density as a predictor of mammographic detection: comparison of interval- and screen-detected cancers.
Mandelson MT; Oestreicher N; Porter PL; White D; Finder CA; Taplin SH; White E
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2000 Jul; 92(13):1081-7. PubMed ID: 10880551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Tailored Breast Screening Trial (TBST)].
Paci E; Mantellini P; Giorgi Rossi P; Falini P; Puliti D;
Epidemiol Prev; 2013; 37(4-5):317-27. PubMed ID: 24293498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Natural history of breast cancers detected in the Swedish mammography screening programme: a cohort study.
Zahl PH; Gøtzsche PC; Mæhlen J
Lancet Oncol; 2011 Nov; 12(12):1118-24. PubMed ID: 21996169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Two-view digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography in a population-based breast cancer screening programme (To-Be): a randomised, controlled trial.
Hofvind S; Holen ÅS; Aase HS; Houssami N; Sebuødegård S; Moger TA; Haldorsen IS; Akslen LA
Lancet Oncol; 2019 Jun; 20(6):795-805. PubMed ID: 31078459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Deep Neural Networks With Region-Based Pooling Structures for Mammographic Image Classification.
Shu X; Zhang L; Wang Z; Lv Q; Yi Z
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2020 Jun; 39(6):2246-2255. PubMed ID: 31985411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of the transition from screen-film to digital screening mammography on interval cancer characteristics and treatment - a population based study from the Netherlands.
Nederend J; Duijm LE; Louwman MW; Coebergh JW; Roumen RM; Lohle PN; Roukema JA; Rutten MJ; van Steenbergen LN; Ernst MF; Jansen FH; Plaisier ML; Hooijen MJ; Voogd AC
Eur J Cancer; 2014 Jan; 50(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 24275518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Range of Radiologist Performance in a Population-based Screening Cohort of 1 Million Digital Mammography Examinations.
Salim M; Dembrower K; Eklund M; Lindholm P; Strand F
Radiology; 2020 Oct; 297(1):33-39. PubMed ID: 32720866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Breast cancer risk prediction combining a convolutional neural network-based mammographic evaluation with clinical factors.
Michel A; Ro V; McGuinness JE; Mutasa S; Terry MB; Tehranifar P; May B; Ha R; Crew KD
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2023 Jul; 200(2):237-245. PubMed ID: 37209183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Deep learning modeling using normal mammograms for predicting breast cancer risk.
Arefan D; Mohamed AA; Berg WA; Zuley ML; Sumkin JH; Wu S
Med Phys; 2020 Jan; 47(1):110-118. PubMed ID: 31667873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Synthetic 2D Mammography versus Digital Mammography: Evaluation in a Population-based Screening Program.
Hofvind S; Hovda T; Holen ÅS; Lee CI; Albertsen J; Bjørndal H; Brandal SHB; Gullien R; Lømo J; Park D; Romundstad L; Suhrke P; Vigeland E; Skaane P
Radiology; 2018 Jun; 287(3):787-794. PubMed ID: 29494322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
