These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
272 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31520372)
21. Environmental protection tax and the labor income share of companies: evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China. Xiao Q; Jiang Y; Li R; Xiao S Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Mar; 30(14):41820-41833. PubMed ID: 36640237 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Environmental regulation, industrial structure and energy efficiency: Evidence from 30 provinces in China. Zhu H; Cai P; Fang H; Zhu Z; Li Y; Zhu R PLoS One; 2024; 19(5):e0299731. PubMed ID: 38768191 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The influence of environmental tax reform on corporate profit margins-based on the empirical research of the enterprises in the heavy pollution industries. He X; Jing Q Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Mar; 30(13):36337-36349. PubMed ID: 36547844 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Re-examining the governance effect of China's environmental protection tax. Lin Y; Liao L; Yu C; Yang Q Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 May; 30(22):62325-62340. PubMed ID: 36940026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Evaluating the Carbon Emissions Efficiency of the Logistics Industry Based on a Super-SBM Model and the Malmquist Index from a Strong Transportation Strategy Perspective in China. Jiang X; Ma J; Zhu H; Guo X; Huang Z Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Nov; 17(22):. PubMed ID: 33203168 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Will the "Environmental Fees to Taxes" Affect Firm Charitable Giving? Niu F; Wang J; Su W Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Nov; 19(23):. PubMed ID: 36497745 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Data-Driven Eco-Efficiency Analysis and Improvement in the Logistics Industry in Anhui. Sun S; Liu Y Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2023 Mar; 20(6):. PubMed ID: 36981718 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Does a Recycling Carbon Tax with Technological Progress in Clean Electricity Drive the Green Economy? Liu W; Liu M; Liu T; Li Y; Hao Y Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Feb; 19(3):. PubMed ID: 35162731 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The effects of the environmental protection tax law on heavily polluting firms in China. Wen H; Deng W; Guo Q PLoS One; 2021; 16(12):e0261342. PubMed ID: 34914798 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Study on the Impact of Environmental Tax on Industrial Green Transformation. Shen Y; Zhang X Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Dec; 19(24):. PubMed ID: 36554630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Technical efficiency estimation of China's environmental protection enterprises and its heterogeneity. Wang R; Wang R; He X Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 Sep; 27(26):33161-33180. PubMed ID: 32529612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Improve energy use efficiency through free trade policy: evidence from the establishment of free trade zones in China. Ma Z; Wang J; Wang N; Yang Z Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2024 Jun; 31(27):39388-39405. PubMed ID: 38819508 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Effects of Carbon Tax on Urban Carbon Emission Reduction: Evidence in China Environmental Governance. Zhao A; Song X; Li J; Yuan Q; Pei Y; Li R; Hitch M Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2023 Jan; 20(3):. PubMed ID: 36767655 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Green Innovation and Business Sustainability: New Evidence from Energy Intensive Industry in China. Li L; Msaad H; Sun H; Tan MX; Lu Y; Lau AKW Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Oct; 17(21):. PubMed ID: 33114610 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Adjusting export tax rebates to reduce the environmental impacts of trade: Lessons from China. Song P; Mao X; Corsetti G J Environ Manage; 2015 Sep; 161():408-416. PubMed ID: 26210774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A methodologically sound survey of Chinese consumers' willingness to participate in courier, express, and parcel companies' green logistics. Sajid MJ; Gonzalez EDRS; Zhan J; Song X; Sun Y; Xie J PLoS One; 2021; 16(7):e0255532. PubMed ID: 34329331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Do the policy burdens of state-owned enterprises affect the efficiency of resource allocation of tax incentives? Liao F; Sun Y; Xu S Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Jun; 30(30):75957-75972. PubMed ID: 37225955 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Analysis of the total factor energy efficiency and its influencing factors of the Belt and Road key regions in China. Yang Z; Wei X Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Feb; 26(5):4764-4776. PubMed ID: 30565113 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Do regional tax incentive policies improve productivity? Zhao M; Xiao X; Yang J; Chen H PLoS One; 2024; 19(8):e0307561. PubMed ID: 39190658 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Effects of technological innovation on energy efficiency in China: Evidence from dynamic panel of 284 cities. Wang H; Wang M Sci Total Environ; 2020 Mar; 709():136172. PubMed ID: 31905588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]