These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31520402)

  • 1. Diagnostic value of the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) simple rules versus pattern recognition to differentiate between malignant and benign ovarian masses.
    Dakhly DMR; Gaafar HM; Sediek MM; Ibrahim MF; Momtaz M
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2019 Dec; 147(3):344-349. PubMed ID: 31520402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prospective external validation of IOTA three-step strategy for characterizing and classifying adnexal masses and retrospective assessment of alternative two-step strategy using simple-rules risk.
    Hidalgo JJ; Ros F; Aubá M; Errasti T; Olartecoechea B; Ruiz-Zambrana Á; Alcázar JL
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 May; 53(5):693-700. PubMed ID: 30353585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of Effectiveness in Differentiating Benign from Malignant Ovarian Masses between IOTA Simple Rules and Subjective Sonographic Assessment.
    Tongsong T; Tinnangwattana D; Vichak-Ururote L; Tontivuthikul P; Charoenratana C; Lerthiranwong T
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2016; 17(9):4377-4380. PubMed ID: 27797247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of International Ovarian Tumor Analysis simple rules and the risk of malignancy index to discriminate between benign and malignant adnexal masses.
    Auekitrungrueng R; Tinnangwattana D; Tantipalakorn C; Charoenratana C; Lerthiranwong T; Wanapirak C; Tongsong T
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2019 Sep; 146(3):364-369. PubMed ID: 31206642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Prospective External Validation of International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) Simple Rules in the Hands of Level I and II Examiners.
    Knafel A; Banas T; Nocun A; Wiechec M; Jach R; Ludwin A; Kabzinska-Turek M; Pietrus M; Pitynski K
    Ultraschall Med; 2016 Oct; 37(5):516-523. PubMed ID: 26126150
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prospective evaluation of IOTA logistic regression models LR1 and LR2 in comparison with subjective pattern recognition for diagnosis of ovarian cancer in an outpatient setting.
    Nunes N; Ambler G; Foo X; Widschwendter M; Jurkovic D
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jun; 51(6):829-835. PubMed ID: 28976616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. IOTA simple rules in differentiating between benign and malignant ovarian tumors.
    Tantipalakorn C; Wanapirak C; Khunamornpong S; Sukpan K; Tongsong T
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(13):5123-6. PubMed ID: 25040961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Performance of IOTA Simple Rules, Simple Rules risk assessment, ADNEX model and O-RADS in differentiating between benign and malignant adnexal lesions in North American women.
    Hiett AK; Sonek JD; Guy M; Reid TJ
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2022 May; 59(5):668-676. PubMed ID: 34533862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of International Ovarian Tumor Analysis Simple Rules to Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Guidelines for Detection of Malignancy in Adnexal Cysts.
    Patel-Lippmann KK; Sadowski EA; Robbins JB; Paroder V; Barroilhet L; Maddox E; McMahon T; Sampene E; Wasnik AP; Blaty AD; Maturen KE
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Mar; 214(3):694-700. PubMed ID: 31770022
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Use of IOTA simple rules for diagnosis of ovarian cancer: meta-analysis.
    Nunes N; Ambler G; Foo X; Naftalin J; Widschwendter M; Jurkovic D
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Nov; 44(5):503-14. PubMed ID: 24920435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Predicting Malignancy in Adnexal Masses by the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis-Simple Rules.
    Solanki V; Singh P; Sharma C; Ghuman N; Sureka B; Shekhar S; Gothwal M; Yadav G
    J Midlife Health; 2020; 11(4):217-223. PubMed ID: 33767562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Diagnostic performance of IOTA simple rules for adnexal masses classification: a comparison between two centers with different ovarian cancer prevalence.
    Ruiz de Gauna B; Rodriguez D; Olartecoechea B; Aubá M; Jurado M; Gómez Roig MD; Alcázar JL
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Aug; 191():10-4. PubMed ID: 26066289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of IOTA Simple Ultrasound Rules to Distinguish Benign and Malignant Ovarian Tumours.
    Garg S; Kaur A; Mohi JK; Sibia PK; Kaur N
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2017 Aug; 11(8):TC06-TC09. PubMed ID: 28969237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of Simple Ultrasound Rules by International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) with RMI-1 and RMI-4 (Risk of Malignancy Index) in Preoperative Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Adnexal Masses.
    Dewangan S; Gupta S; Chawla I
    J Obstet Gynaecol India; 2024 Apr; 74(2):158-164. PubMed ID: 38707882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. External validation of Risk of Malignancy Index compared to IOTA Simple Rules.
    Mulder EE; Gelderblom ME; Schoot D; Vergeldt TF; Nijssen DL; Piek JM
    Acta Radiol; 2021 May; 62(5):673-678. PubMed ID: 32567319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. External validation of IOTA simple descriptors and simple rules for classifying adnexal masses.
    Alcázar JL; Pascual MA; Graupera B; Aubá M; Errasti T; Olartecoechea B; Ruiz-Zambrana A; Hereter L; Ajossa S; Guerriero S
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Sep; 48(3):397-402. PubMed ID: 26748432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. IOTA Simple Rules in Differentiating between Benign and Malignant Adnexal Masses by Non-expert Examiners.
    Tinnangwattana D; Vichak-Ururote L; Tontivuthikul P; Charoenratana C; Lerthiranwong T; Tongsong T
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(9):3835-8. PubMed ID: 25987045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Lesion size affects diagnostic performance of IOTA logistic regression models, IOTA simple rules and risk of malignancy index in discriminating between benign and malignant adnexal masses.
    Di Legge A; Testa AC; Ameye L; Van Calster B; Lissoni AA; Leone FP; Savelli L; Franchi D; Czekierdowski A; Trio D; Van Holsbeke C; Ferrazzi E; Scambia G; Timmerman D; Valentin L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Sep; 40(3):345-54. PubMed ID: 22611001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ultrasound examination, MRI, or ROMA for discriminating between inconclusive adnexal masses as determined by IOTA Simple Rules: a prospective study.
    Chacon E; Arraiza M; Manzour N; Benito A; Mínguez JÁ; Vázquez-Vicente D; Castellanos T; Chiva L; Alcazar JL
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2023 Jun; 33(6):951-956. PubMed ID: 37055169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. IOTA Simple Ultrasound Rules for Triage of Adnexal Mass: Experience from South India.
    Shetty J; Saradha A; Pandey D; Bhat R; Pratap Kumar ; Bharatnur S
    J Obstet Gynaecol India; 2019 Aug; 69(4):356-362. PubMed ID: 31391744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.