These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31520417)

  • 21. [Dose exposure from analog and digital full mouth radiography and panoramic radiography].
    Kiefer H; Lambrecht JT; Roth J
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 2004; 114(7):687-93. PubMed ID: 15360104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [The measurement parameters in dental radiography: a comparison between traditional and digital technics].
    Lazzerini F; Minorati D; Nessi R; Gagliani M; Uslenghi CM
    Radiol Med; 1996 Apr; 91(4):364-9. PubMed ID: 8643845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A comparison of perceived diagnostic image quality in direct digital panoramic images between standard and advanced external GOP image processing.
    Svenson B; Båth M; Karlsson R; Persson B
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2019 Nov; 77(8):560-565. PubMed ID: 31146623
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The subjective image quality of direct digital and conventional panoramic radiography.
    Gijbels F; De Meyer AM; Bou Serhal C; Van den Bossche C; Declerck J; Persoons M; Jacobs R
    Clin Oral Investig; 2000 Sep; 4(3):162-7. PubMed ID: 11000322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Intraoral or panoramic radiography?
    Bean LR; Akerman WY
    Dent Clin North Am; 1984 Jan; 28(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 6584346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Digital volume tomography in the diagnosis of peri-implant defects: an in vitro study on native pig mandibles.
    Mengel R; Kruse B; Flores-de-Jacoby L
    J Periodontol; 2006 Jul; 77(7):1234-41. PubMed ID: 16805688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Accuracy and head positioning effects on measurements of anterior tooth length using 3-dimensional and conventional dental panoramic radiography.
    Kitai N; Murabayashi M; Sugimoto H; Fujiwara A; Tome W; Katsumata A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Mar; 151(3):607-615. PubMed ID: 28257745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Dimensional reproduction in direct digital rotational panoramic radiography.
    McDavid WD; Dove SB; Welander U; Tronje G
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1993 Apr; 75(4):523-7. PubMed ID: 8464620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A comparison of the diagnostic advantages of panoramic radiography and computed tomography scanning for placement of root form dental implants.
    Reddy MS; Mayfield-Donahoo T; Vanderven FJ; Jeffcoat MK
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 1994 Dec; 5(4):229-38. PubMed ID: 7640337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Conventional dental radiography and future prospectives].
    Youssefzadeh S; Gahleitner A; Bernhart D; Bernhart T
    Radiologe; 1999 Dec; 39(12):1018-26. PubMed ID: 10643025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of two cone beam computed tomographic systems versus panoramic imaging for localization of impacted maxillary canines and detection of root resorption.
    Alqerban A; Jacobs R; Fieuws S; Willems G
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Feb; 33(1):93-102. PubMed ID: 21270321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Optimization of exposure in panoramic radiography while maintaining image quality using adaptive filtering.
    Svenson B; Larsson L; Båth M
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2016; 74(3):229-35. PubMed ID: 26478956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Can adaptive post-processing of storage phosphor plate panoramic radiographs provide better image quality? A comparison of anatomical image quality of panoramic radiographs before and after adaptive processing.
    Svenson B; Båth M; Karlsson R
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2019 Jul; 77(5):328-333. PubMed ID: 30623704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Real, double, and ghost images in rotational panoramic radiography.
    McDavid WD; Langlais RP; Welander U; Morris CR
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1983; 12(2):122-8. PubMed ID: 6584361
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A rare earth screen-film system for dental panoramic radiography.
    Keur JJ
    Aust Dent J; 1983 Apr; 28(2):105-8. PubMed ID: 6577821
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. An update on dental imaging.
    Whaites E; Brown J
    Br Dent J; 1998 Aug; 185(4):166-72. PubMed ID: 9769550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Dental CT imaging as a screening tool for dental profiling: advantages and limitations.
    Thali MJ; Markwalder T; Jackowski C; Sonnenschein M; Dirnhofer R
    J Forensic Sci; 2006 Jan; 51(1):113-9. PubMed ID: 16423234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Two- versus three-dimensional imaging in subjects with unerupted maxillary canines.
    Botticelli S; Verna C; Cattaneo PM; Heidmann J; Melsen B
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Aug; 33(4):344-9. PubMed ID: 21131389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparing the accuracy of panoramic and intraoral radiography in the diagnosis of proximal caries.
    Akkaya N; Kansu O; Kansu H; Cagirankaya LB; Arslan U
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 May; 35(3):170-4. PubMed ID: 16618850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A posteriori registration and subtraction of panoramic compared with intraoral radiography.
    Deserno TM; Rangarajan JR; Hoffmann J; Brägger U; Mericske-Stern R; Enkling N
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Aug; 108(2):e39-45. PubMed ID: 19615643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.