These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31520876)

  • 1. Caesarean scar defect: Risk factors and comparison of evaluation efficacy between transvaginal sonography and magnetic resonance imaging.
    Tang X; Wang J; Du Y; Xie M; Zhang H; Xu H; Hua K
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 Nov; 242():1-6. PubMed ID: 31520876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pilot study of MRI/ultrasound fusion imaging in postpartum assessment of Cesarean section scar.
    Bolten K; Fischer T; Bender YY; Diederichs G; Thomas A
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Oct; 50(4):520-526. PubMed ID: 27804175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cesarean section scar diverticulum evaluation by saline contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: The relationship between variable parameters and longer menstrual bleeding.
    Yao M; Wang W; Zhou J; Sun M; Zhu J; Chen P; Wang X
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2017 Apr; 43(4):696-704. PubMed ID: 28168867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of uterine scar healing by transvaginal ultrasound in 607 nonpregnant women with a history of cesarean section.
    Zhou X; Zhang T; Qiao H; Zhang Y; Wang X
    BMC Womens Health; 2021 May; 21(1):199. PubMed ID: 33985487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Agreement between transvaginal ultrasound and saline contrast sonohysterography in evaluation of cesarean scar defect.
    Rasheedy R; Sammour H; Elkholy A; Fadel E
    J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2019 Dec; 48(10):827-831. PubMed ID: 31077871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of scar thickness measurements using trans-vaginal sonography and MRI in cases of pregnancy with previous caesarean section. Do they correlate with actual scar thickness?
    Singh N; Tripathi R; Mala YM; Dixit R; Tyagi S; Batra A
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2013 Nov; 33(8):810-3. PubMed ID: 24219719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Vaginal Repair of Cesarean Section Scar Diverticula Diagnosed in Non-pregnant Women.
    Chen H; Wang H; Zhou J; Xiong Y; Wang X
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(3):526-534. PubMed ID: 29944931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Efficacy of caesarean scar defect repair in improving postmenstrual bleeding and factors associated with poor effect.
    Xu HY; Yang MY; Zhang X; Wang Q; Yi XF; Ding JX; Hua KQ
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2017 Nov; 37(8):1076-1081. PubMed ID: 28760055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Association between ultrasonographic parameters of Cesarean scar defect and outcome of early termination of pregnancy.
    Au HK; Liu CF; Tzeng CR; Chien LW
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Apr; 47(4):506-10. PubMed ID: 25865778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cesarean scar defect: correlation between Cesarean section number, defect size, clinical symptoms and uterine position.
    Wang CB; Chiu WW; Lee CY; Sun YL; Lin YH; Tseng CJ
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Jul; 34(1):85-9. PubMed ID: 19565535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Morphology of the cesarean section scar in the non-pregnant uterus after one elective cesarean section.
    Pomorski M; Fuchs T; Rosner-Tenerowicz A; Zimmer M
    Ginekol Pol; 2017; 88(4):174-179. PubMed ID: 28509317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Is it necessary to correct a caesarean scar defect before a subsequent pregnancy? A report of three cases.
    Szkodziak P; Stępniak A; Czuczwar P; Szkodziak F; Paszkowski T; Woźniak S
    J Int Med Res; 2019 May; 47(5):2248-2255. PubMed ID: 30880523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The prevalence and risk predictors of cesarean scar defect at 6 weeks postpartum in Shanghai, China: A prospective cohort study.
    Pan H; Zeng M; Xu T; Li D; Mol BWJ; Sun J; Zhang J
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2019 Apr; 98(4):413-422. PubMed ID: 30444954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Standardized ultrasonographic approach for the assessment of risk factors of incomplete healing of the cesarean section scar in the uterus.
    Pomorski M; Fuchs T; Rosner-Tenerowicz A; Zimmer M
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Oct; 205():141-5. PubMed ID: 27591715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Prediction Model for the Efficacy of Transvaginal Repair in Patients With Cesarean Scar Defect: An Evidence-Based Proposal for Patient Selection.
    Zhou X; Gao Z; Chen H; Wang Y; Yin Y; Zhang J; Wang X
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2024 Mar; 31(3):213-220. PubMed ID: 38135001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A transvaginal ultrasound-based diagnostic calculator for uterus post-cesarean scar defect.
    Allameh Z; Rouholamin S; Rasti S; Adibi A; Foroughi Z; Goharian M; Rad MR; Dabaghi GG
    BMC Womens Health; 2023 Oct; 23(1):558. PubMed ID: 37891612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Risk factors for incomplete healing of the uterine incision after caesarean section.
    Vikhareva Osser O; Valentin L
    BJOG; 2010 Aug; 117(9):1119-26. PubMed ID: 20604776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A prospective study on risk factors associated with the development of isthmocele after caesarean section.
    Shabnam K; Begum J; Singh S; Mohakud S
    J Ultrasound; 2024 Sep; 27(3):679-688. PubMed ID: 38909346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Vaginal Repair of Cesarean Section Scar Diverticula that Resulted in Improved Postoperative Menstruation.
    Zhou J; Yao M; Wang H; Tan W; Chen P; Wang X
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(6):969-78. PubMed ID: 27346299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cesarean Scar Thickness Decreases during Pregnancy: A Prospective Longitudinal Study.
    Savukyne E; Machtejeviene E; Kliucinskas M; Paskauskas S
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2022 Mar; 58(3):. PubMed ID: 35334583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.