These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31521151)

  • 21. Ten tips for effective use and quality assurance of multiple-choice questions in knowledge-based assessments.
    Ali K; Zahra D
    Eur J Dent Educ; 2024 May; 28(2):655-662. PubMed ID: 38282273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Assessment of higher order cognitive skills in undergraduate education: modified essay or multiple choice questions? Research paper.
    Palmer EJ; Devitt PG
    BMC Med Educ; 2007 Nov; 7():49. PubMed ID: 18045500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evaluation of the effect of items' format and type on psychometric properties of sixth year pharmacy students clinical clerkship assessment items.
    AlKhatib HS; Brazeau G; Akour A; Almuhaissen SA
    BMC Med Educ; 2020 Jun; 20(1):190. PubMed ID: 32532278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Rarely selected distractors in high stakes medical multiple-choice examinations and their recognition by item authors: a simulation and survey.
    Rogausch A; Hofer R; Krebs R
    BMC Med Educ; 2010 Nov; 10():85. PubMed ID: 21106066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Analysis of one-best MCQs: the difficulty index, discrimination index and distractor efficiency.
    Hingorjo MR; Jaleel F
    J Pak Med Assoc; 2012 Feb; 62(2):142-7. PubMed ID: 22755376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparing Item Performance on Three- Versus Four-Option Multiple Choice Questions in a Veterinary Toxicology Course.
    Royal K; Dorman D
    Vet Sci; 2018 Jun; 5(2):. PubMed ID: 29890727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effectiveness of longitudinal faculty development programs on MCQs items writing skills: A follow-up study.
    Abdulghani HM; Irshad M; Haque S; Ahmad T; Sattar K; Khalil MS
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(10):e0185895. PubMed ID: 29016659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. An experimental comparison of multiple-choice and short-answer questions on a high-stakes test for medical students.
    Mee J; Pandian R; Wolczynski J; Morales A; Paniagua M; Harik P; Baldwin P; Clauser BE
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2024 Jul; 29(3):783-801. PubMed ID: 37665413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Relations of the Number of Functioning Distractors With the Item Difficulty Index and the Item Discrimination Power in the Multiple Choice Questions.
    Chauhan GR; Chauhan BR; Vaza JV; Chauhan PR
    Cureus; 2023 Jul; 15(7):e42492. PubMed ID: 37644928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluation of MCQs from MOOCs for common item writing flaws.
    Costello E; Holland JC; Kirwan C
    BMC Res Notes; 2018 Dec; 11(1):849. PubMed ID: 30509321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Developing and evaluating the student assessment system in the preclinical problem-based curriculum at Sherbrooke.
    Des Marchais JE; Vu NV
    Acad Med; 1996 Mar; 71(3):274-83. PubMed ID: 8607928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Improving the fairness of multiple-choice questions: a literature review.
    McCoubrie P
    Med Teach; 2004 Dec; 26(8):709-12. PubMed ID: 15763874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Climbing Bloom's taxonomy pyramid: Lessons from a graduate histology course.
    Zaidi NB; Hwang C; Scott S; Stallard S; Purkiss J; Hortsch M
    Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Sep; 10(5):456-464. PubMed ID: 28231408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A comparison of the psychometric properties of three- and four-option multiple-choice questions in nursing assessments.
    Tarrant M; Ware J
    Nurse Educ Today; 2010 Aug; 30(6):539-43. PubMed ID: 20053488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A, B, or C? A Quasi-experimental Multi-site Study Investigating Three Option Multiple Choice Questions.
    Hartigan-Rogers JA; Redmond S; Cobbett S; Cifuentes K; Honan D; Richard E; Sheane V; VanTassell T
    Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh; 2019 Dec; 16(1):. PubMed ID: 31863697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Education techniques for lifelong learning: writing multiple-choice questions for continuing medical education activities and self-assessment modules.
    Collins J
    Radiographics; 2006; 26(2):543-51. PubMed ID: 16549616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The Effect of a One-Day Workshop on the Quality of Framing Multiple Choice Questions in Physiology in a Medical College in India.
    Dhanvijay AKD; Dhokane N; Balgote S; Kumari A; Juhi A; Mondal H; Gupta P
    Cureus; 2023 Aug; 15(8):e44049. PubMed ID: 37746478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evaluation of peer-generated MCQs to assess and support learning in a problem-based learning programme.
    Botelho MG; Lam O; Watt RM; Leung D; Kember D
    Eur J Dent Educ; 2018 Aug; 22(3):e358-e363. PubMed ID: 29266581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Correlation of MCQ and SEQ scores in written undergraduate ophthalmology assessment.
    Mahmood H
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2015 Mar; 25(3):185-8. PubMed ID: 25772958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A solution to the cueing effects of multiple choice questions: the Un-Q format.
    Veloski JJ; Rabinowitz HK; Robeson MR
    Med Educ; 1993 Jul; 27(4):371-5. PubMed ID: 8412880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.