These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31521453)

  • 1. Prediction of the pathological fracture risk during stance and fall-loading configurations for metastases in the proximal femur, using a computed tomography-based finite element method.
    Shinoda Y; Kobayashi H; Kaneko M; Ohashi S; Bessho M; Hayashi N; Oka H; Imanishi J; Sawada R; Ogura K; Tanaka S; Haga N; Kawano H
    J Orthop Sci; 2019 Nov; 24(6):1074-1080. PubMed ID: 31521453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prediction of proximal femur strength using a CT-based nonlinear finite element method: differences in predicted fracture load and site with changing load and boundary conditions.
    Bessho M; Ohnishi I; Matsumoto T; Ohashi S; Matsuyama J; Tobita K; Kaneko M; Nakamura K
    Bone; 2009 Aug; 45(2):226-31. PubMed ID: 19398043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. To what extent can linear finite element models of human femora predict failure under stance and fall loading configurations?
    Schileo E; Balistreri L; Grassi L; Cristofolini L; Taddei F
    J Biomech; 2014 Nov; 47(14):3531-8. PubMed ID: 25261321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prediction of torsional failure in 22 cadaver femora with and without simulated subtrochanteric metastatic defects: a CT scan-based finite element analysis.
    Spruijt S; van der Linden JC; Dijkstra PD; Wiggers T; Oudkerk M; Snijders CJ; van Keulen F; Verhaar JA; Weinans H; Swierstra BA
    Acta Orthop; 2006 Jun; 77(3):474-81. PubMed ID: 16819688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of finite element analysis for prediction of the strength reduction due to metastatic lesions in the femoral neck.
    Cheal EJ; Hipp JA; Hayes WC
    J Biomech; 1993 Mar; 26(3):251-64. PubMed ID: 8468338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of finite element model loading condition on fracture risk assessment in men and women: the AGES-Reykjavik study.
    Keyak JH; Sigurdsson S; Karlsdottir GS; Oskarsdottir D; Sigmarsdottir A; Kornak J; Harris TB; Sigurdsson G; Jonsson BY; Siggeirsdottir K; Eiriksdottir G; Gudnason V; Lang TF
    Bone; 2013 Nov; 57(1):18-29. PubMed ID: 23907032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of simulated metastatic lytic lesions on proximal femoral strength.
    Keyak JH; Kaneko TS; Skinner HB; Hoang BH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2007 Jun; 459():139-45. PubMed ID: 17545762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The risk assessment of pathological fracture in the proximal femur using a CT-based finite element method.
    Kawabata Y; Matsuo K; Nezu Y; Kamiishi T; Inaba Y; Saito T
    J Orthop Sci; 2017 Sep; 22(5):931-937. PubMed ID: 28688810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Study of stress variations in single-stance and sideways fall using image-based finite element analysis.
    Faisal TR; Luo Y
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2016 May; 27(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 27175463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Exercise loading history and femoral neck strength in a sideways fall: A three-dimensional finite element modeling study.
    Abe S; Narra N; Nikander R; Hyttinen J; Kouhia R; Sievänen H
    Bone; 2016 Nov; 92():9-17. PubMed ID: 27477004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Incorporating in vivo fall assessments in the simulation of femoral fractures with finite element models.
    van der Zijden AM; Janssen D; Verdonschot N; Groen BE; Nienhuis B; Weerdesteyn V; Tanck E
    Med Eng Phys; 2015 Jun; 37(6):593-8. PubMed ID: 25892569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prediction of proximal femur strength by a quantitative computed tomography-based finite element method--Creation of predicted strength data of the proximal femur according to age range in a normal population.
    Kaneko M; Ohnishi I; Matsumoto T; Ohashi S; Bessho M; Hayashi N; Tanaka S
    Mod Rheumatol; 2016; 26(1):151-5. PubMed ID: 25926424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prediction of strength and strain of the proximal femur by a CT-based finite element method.
    Bessho M; Ohnishi I; Matsuyama J; Matsumoto T; Imai K; Nakamura K
    J Biomech; 2007; 40(8):1745-53. PubMed ID: 17034798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Study of the variations of fall induced hip fracture risk between right and left femurs using CT-based FEA.
    Faisal TR; Luo Y
    Biomed Eng Online; 2017 Oct; 16(1):116. PubMed ID: 28974207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact loading history modulates hip fracture load and location: A finite element simulation study of the proximal femur in female athletes.
    Abe S; Narra N; Nikander R; Hyttinen J; Kouhia R; Sievänen H
    J Biomech; 2018 Jul; 76():136-143. PubMed ID: 29921524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Modification to Mirels scoring system location component improves fracture prediction for metastatic disease of the proximal femur.
    Amendola RL; Miller MA; Kaupp SM; Cleary RJ; Damron TA; Mann KA
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2023 Jan; 24(1):65. PubMed ID: 36694156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fracture prediction for the proximal femur using finite element models: Part I--Linear analysis.
    Lotz JC; Cheal EJ; Hayes WC
    J Biomech Eng; 1991 Nov; 113(4):353-60. PubMed ID: 1762430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improved prediction of proximal femoral fracture load using nonlinear finite element models.
    Keyak JH
    Med Eng Phys; 2001 Apr; 23(3):165-73. PubMed ID: 11410381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mapping anisotropy improves QCT-based finite element estimation of hip strength in pooled stance and side-fall load configurations.
    Panyasantisuk J; Dall'Ara E; Pretterklieber M; Pahr DH; Zysset PK
    Med Eng Phys; 2018 Sep; 59():36-42. PubMed ID: 30131112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hip load capacity and yield load in men and women of all ages.
    Keyak JH; Kaneko TS; Khosla S; Amin S; Atkinson EJ; Lang TF; Sibonga JD
    Bone; 2020 Aug; 137():115321. PubMed ID: 32184195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.