186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31521453)
21. QCT-based finite element prediction of pathologic fractures in proximal femora with metastatic lesions.
Benca E; Synek A; Amini M; Kainberger F; Hirtler L; Windhager R; Mayr W; Pahr DH
Sci Rep; 2019 Jul; 9(1):10305. PubMed ID: 31311994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. When and where do patients with bone metastases actually break their femurs?
Sternheim A; Traub F; Trabelsi N; Dadia S; Gortzak Y; Snir N; Gorfine M; Yosibash Z
Bone Joint J; 2020 May; 102-B(5):638-645. PubMed ID: 32349590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Prediction of femoral fracture load using automated finite element modeling.
Keyak JH; Rossi SA; Jones KA; Skinner HB
J Biomech; 1998 Feb; 31(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 9593205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Physical activity induced adaptation can increase proximal femur strength under loading from a fall onto the greater trochanter.
Fuchs RK; Carballido-Gamio J; Keyak JH; Kersh ME; Warden SJ
Bone; 2021 Nov; 152():116090. PubMed ID: 34175500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Biomechanical model of a high risk impending pathologic fracture of the femur: lesion creation based on clinically implemented scoring systems.
Alexander GE; Gutierrez S; Nayak A; Palumbo BT; Cheong D; Letson GD; Santoni BG
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2013 Apr; 28(4):408-14. PubMed ID: 23597777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Ct-based finite element models can be used to estimate experimentally measured failure loads in the proximal femur.
Koivumäki JE; Thevenot J; Pulkkinen P; Kuhn V; Link TM; Eckstein F; Jämsä T
Bone; 2012 Apr; 50(4):824-9. PubMed ID: 22306697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Prediction of fracture load and stiffness of the proximal femur by CT-based specimen specific finite element analysis: cadaveric validation study.
Miura M; Nakamura J; Matsuura Y; Wako Y; Suzuki T; Hagiwara S; Orita S; Inage K; Kawarai Y; Sugano M; Nawata K; Ohtori S
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2017 Dec; 18(1):536. PubMed ID: 29246133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Cortical bone finite element models in the estimation of experimentally measured failure loads in the proximal femur.
Koivumäki JE; Thevenot J; Pulkkinen P; Kuhn V; Link TM; Eckstein F; Jämsä T
Bone; 2012 Oct; 51(4):737-40. PubMed ID: 22796418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Prediction of fracture location in the proximal femur using finite element models.
Keyak JH; Rossi SA; Jones KA; Les CM; Skinner HB
Med Eng Phys; 2001 Nov; 23(9):657-64. PubMed ID: 11755810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The assessment of the risk of fracture in femora with metastatic lesions: comparing case-specific finite element analyses with predictions by clinical experts.
Derikx LC; van Aken JB; Janssen D; Snyers A; van der Linden YM; Verdonschot N; Tanck E
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Aug; 94(8):1135-42. PubMed ID: 22844058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Orthotropic HR-pQCT-based FE models improve strength predictions for stance but not for side-way fall loading compared to isotropic QCT-based FE models of human femurs.
Luisier B; Dall'Ara E; Pahr DH
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2014 Apr; 32():287-299. PubMed ID: 24508715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Lytic lesions in the femoral neck: Importance of location and evaluation of a novel minimally invasive repair technique.
Kaneko TS; Skinner HB; Keyak JH
J Orthop Res; 2008 Aug; 26(8):1127-32. PubMed ID: 18327790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of in situ and in vitro CT scan-based finite element model predictions of proximal femoral fracture load.
Keyak JH; Falkinstein Y
Med Eng Phys; 2003 Nov; 25(9):781-7. PubMed ID: 14519351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Development of a surrogate model based on patient weight, bone mass and geometry to predict femoral neck strains and fracture loads.
Taylor M; Perilli E; Martelli S
J Biomech; 2017 Apr; 55():121-127. PubMed ID: 28325584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Can CT image deblurring improve finite element predictions at the proximal femur?
Falcinelli C; Schileo E; Pakdel A; Whyne C; Cristofolini L; Taddei F
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2016 Oct; 63():337-351. PubMed ID: 27450036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Multiple loading conditions analysis can improve the association between finite element bone strength estimates and proximal femur fractures: a preliminary study in elderly women.
Falcinelli C; Schileo E; Balistreri L; Baruffaldi F; Bordini B; Viceconti M; Albisinni U; Ceccarelli F; Milandri L; Toni A; Taddei F
Bone; 2014 Oct; 67():71-80. PubMed ID: 25014885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. CT-based Structural Rigidity Analysis Is More Accurate Than Mirels Scoring for Fracture Prediction in Metastatic Femoral Lesions.
Damron TA; Nazarian A; Entezari V; Brown C; Grant W; Calderon N; Zurakowski D; Terek RM; Anderson ME; Cheng EY; Aboulafia AJ; Gebhardt MC; Snyder BD
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Mar; 474(3):643-51. PubMed ID: 26169800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Prediction of femoral fracture load using finite element models: an examination of stress- and strain-based failure theories.
Keyak JH; Rossi SA
J Biomech; 2000 Feb; 33(2):209-14. PubMed ID: 10653034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Cementoplasty of metastases of the proximal femur: is it a safe palliative option?
Deschamps F; Farouil G; Hakime A; Barah A; Guiu B; Teriitehau C; Auperin A; deBaere T
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2012 Oct; 23(10):1311-6. PubMed ID: 22920730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. New QCT analysis approach shows the importance of fall orientation on femoral neck strength.
Carpenter RD; Beaupré GS; Lang TF; Orwoll ES; Carter DR;
J Bone Miner Res; 2005 Sep; 20(9):1533-42. PubMed ID: 16059625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
