These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31522094)

  • 1. Brain-behavior relationships in incidental learning of non-native phonetic categories.
    Luthra S; Fuhrmeister P; Molfese PJ; Guediche S; Blumstein SE; Myers EB
    Brain Lang; 2019 Nov; 198():104692. PubMed ID: 31522094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Left Inferior Frontal Gyrus Sensitivity to Phonetic Competition in Receptive Language Processing: A Comparison of Clear and Conversational Speech.
    Xie X; Myers E
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2018 Mar; 30(3):267-280. PubMed ID: 29160743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of category learning on neural sensitivity to non-native phonetic categories.
    Myers EB; Swan K
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2012 Aug; 24(8):1695-708. PubMed ID: 22621261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Early-latency categorical speech sound representations in the left inferior frontal gyrus.
    Alho J; Green BM; May PJC; Sams M; Tiitinen H; Rauschecker JP; Jääskeläinen IP
    Neuroimage; 2016 Apr; 129():214-223. PubMed ID: 26774614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Inferior frontal regions underlie the perception of phonetic category invariance.
    Myers EB; Blumstein SE; Walsh E; Eliassen J
    Psychol Sci; 2009 Jul; 20(7):895-903. PubMed ID: 19515116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Learning new sounds of speech: reallocation of neural substrates.
    Golestani N; Zatorre RJ
    Neuroimage; 2004 Feb; 21(2):494-506. PubMed ID: 14980552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Emergence of category-level sensitivities in non-native speech sound learning.
    Myers EB
    Front Neurosci; 2014; 8():238. PubMed ID: 25152708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Phonetic perceptual identification by native- and second-language speakers differentially activates brain regions involved with acoustic phonetic processing and those involved with articulatory-auditory/orosensory internal models.
    Callan DE; Jones JA; Callan AM; Akahane-Yamada R
    Neuroimage; 2004 Jul; 22(3):1182-94. PubMed ID: 15219590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Nonnative implicit phonetic training in multiple reverberant environments.
    Vlahou E; Seitz AR; Kopčo N
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 May; 81(4):935-947. PubMed ID: 30737758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Modality-independent neural mechanisms for novel phonetic processing.
    Williams JT; Darcy I; Newman SD
    Brain Res; 2015 Sep; 1620():107-15. PubMed ID: 25988835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Statistical phonetic learning in infants: facilitation and feature generalization.
    Maye J; Weiss DJ; Aslin RN
    Dev Sci; 2008 Jan; 11(1):122-34. PubMed ID: 18171374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Learning-induced neural plasticity associated with improved identification performance after training of a difficult second-language phonetic contrast.
    Callan DE; Tajima K; Callan AM; Kubo R; Masaki S; Akahane-Yamada R
    Neuroimage; 2003 May; 19(1):113-24. PubMed ID: 12781731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The perception of voice onset time: an fMRI investigation of phonetic category structure.
    Blumstein SE; Myers EB; Rissman J
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Sep; 17(9):1353-66. PubMed ID: 16197689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Learning words' sounds before learning how words sound: 9-month-olds use distinct objects as cues to categorize speech information.
    Yeung HH; Werker JF
    Cognition; 2009 Nov; 113(2):234-43. PubMed ID: 19765698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Infant-directed speech supports phonetic category learning in English and Japanese.
    Werker JF; Pons F; Dietrich C; Kajikawa S; Fais L; Amano S
    Cognition; 2007 Apr; 103(1):147-62. PubMed ID: 16707119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Does sound structure affect word learning? An eye-tracking study of Danish learning toddlers.
    Trecca F; Bleses D; Madsen TO; Christiansen MH
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2018 Mar; 167():180-203. PubMed ID: 29175718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dissociable effects of phonetic competition and category typicality in a phonetic categorization task: an fMRI investigation.
    Myers EB
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Apr; 45(7):1463-73. PubMed ID: 17178420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Individual Differences in Phonetic Plasticity Across Native and Nonnative Contexts.
    Heffner CC; Myers EB
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2021 Oct; 64(10):3720-3733. PubMed ID: 34525309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Relationships between native and non-native speech perception.
    Fuhrmeister P; Phillips MC; McCoach DB; Myers EB
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2023 Jul; 49(7):1161-1175. PubMed ID: 36757985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Function segregation in the left inferior frontal gyrus: a listening functional magnetic resonance imaging study.
    Wu J; Cai C; Kochiyama T; Osaka K
    Neuroreport; 2007 Jan; 18(2):127-31. PubMed ID: 17301676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.