237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31522329)
1. Effect of Visibility of the Ciliary Body Processes on Ocular Biometric Parameters in Patients with Primary Angle Closure.
Supakontanasan W; Thunwiriya P; Suwan Y; Nilphatanakorn S; Arunmongkol S; Teekhasaenee C
Jpn J Ophthalmol; 2019 Nov; 63(6):467-473. PubMed ID: 31522329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Lens factor as an underlying mechanism in primary angle closure with gonioscopically-visualized ciliary body processes.
Tekcan H; Mangan MS; Celik G; Imamoglu S
Jpn J Ophthalmol; 2023 Nov; 67(6):678-684. PubMed ID: 37596442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of Refractive Status and Ocular Biometric Parameters in Primary Angle Closure Disease.
Loh CC; Kamaruddin H; Bastion MC; Husain R; Mohd Isa H; Md Din N
Ophthalmic Res; 2021; 64(2):246-252. PubMed ID: 32810853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of ocular biometry between eyes with chronic primary angle-closure glaucoma and their fellow eyes with primary angle-closure or primary angle-closure suspect.
Huang J; Wang Z; Wu Z; Li Z; Lai K; Ge J
J Glaucoma; 2015; 24(4):323-7. PubMed ID: 23807358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biometric indicators of eyes with occult lens subluxation inducing secondary acute angle closure.
Xing X; Huang L; Tian F; Zhang Y; Lv Y; Liu W; Liu A
BMC Ophthalmol; 2020 Mar; 20(1):87. PubMed ID: 32138781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biometric parameters in different stages of primary angle closure using low-coherence interferometry.
Yazdani S; Akbarian S; Pakravan M; Doozandeh A; Afrouzifar M
Optom Vis Sci; 2015 Mar; 92(3):343-9. PubMed ID: 25945959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The biometric study in different stages of primary angle-closure glaucoma.
Chen YY; Chen YY; Sheu SJ; Chou P
Eye (Lond); 2013 Sep; 27(9):1070-6. PubMed ID: 23788204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of ultrasound biomicroscopy and ultrasonographic parameters in eyes with phacomorphic glaucoma and eyes with mature cataract.
Subbiah S; Thomas PA; Nelson Jesudasan CA
Int Ophthalmol; 2017 Aug; 37(4):849-858. PubMed ID: 27624171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of uveal parameters between acute primary angle-closure eyes and fellow eyes in South Indian population.
Senthilkumar VA; Pradhan C; Rajendrababu S; Krishnadas R; Mani I
Indian J Ophthalmol; 2022 Apr; 70(4):1232-1238. PubMed ID: 35326023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quantitative measurements of the ciliary body in eyes with malignant glaucoma after trabeculectomy using ultrasound biomicroscopy.
Wang Z; Huang J; Lin J; Liang X; Cai X; Ge J
Ophthalmology; 2014 Apr; 121(4):862-9. PubMed ID: 24321140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of acute angle-closure mechanisms.
Suwan Y; Jiamsawad S; Tantraworasin A; Geyman L; Supakontanasan W; Teekhasaenee C
BMC Ophthalmol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):246. PubMed ID: 29228915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ocular Biometric Risk Factors for Progression of Primary Angle Closure Disease: The Zhongshan Angle Closure Prevention Trial.
Xu BY; Friedman DS; Foster PJ; Jiang Y; Porporato N; Pardeshi AA; Jiang Y; Munoz B; Aung T; He M
Ophthalmology; 2022 Mar; 129(3):267-275. PubMed ID: 34634364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ocular biometry in the subtypes of angle closure: an anterior segment optical coherence tomography study.
Moghimi S; Vahedian Z; Fakhraie G; Ghaffari R; Eslami Y; Jabarvand M; Zarei R; Mohammadi M; Lin S
Am J Ophthalmol; 2013 Apr; 155(4):664-673, 673.e1. PubMed ID: 23246271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ultrasound biomicroscopic and conventional ultrasonographic study of ocular dimensions in primary angle-closure glaucoma.
Marchini G; Pagliarusco A; Toscano A; Tosi R; Brunelli C; Bonomi L
Ophthalmology; 1998 Nov; 105(11):2091-8. PubMed ID: 9818611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of lens parameters in patients with various subtypes of primary angle-closure disease and the normal population: A prospective study.
Chakrabarti K; Samant S; Mohapatra R; Mishra S; Das S; Chakrabarti M
Indian J Ophthalmol; 2022 Aug; 70(8):2889-2894. PubMed ID: 35918938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Follow-up of primary angle closure suspects after laser peripheral iridotomy using ultrasound biomicroscopy and A-scan biometry for a period of 2 years.
Ramani KK; Mani B; George RJ; Lingam V
J Glaucoma; 2009 Sep; 18(7):521-7. PubMed ID: 19745666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of Anterior Segment-Optical Coherence Tomography Parameters in Phacomorphic Angle Closure and Acute Angle Closure Eyes.
Moghimi S; Ramezani F; He M; Coleman AL; Lin SC
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2015 Dec; 56(13):7611-7. PubMed ID: 26624492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biometric Factors Associated With Acute Primary Angle Closure: Comparison of the Affected and Fellow Eye.
Atalay E; Nongpiur ME; Baskaran M; Sharma S; Perera SA; Aung T
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2016 Oct; 57(13):5320-5325. PubMed ID: 27727395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biometric Differences between Unilateral Chronic Primary Angle Closure Glaucoma and Fellow Non-Glaucomatous Eyes.
Wang W; Li X; Chen S; Huang W; Zhang X
Semin Ophthalmol; 2018; 33(5):595-601. PubMed ID: 29185835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Gender variation in ocular biometry and ultrasound biomicroscopy of primary angle closure suspects and normal eyes.
Ramani KK; Mani B; Ronnie G; Joseph R; Lingam V
J Glaucoma; 2007 Jan; 16(1):122-8. PubMed ID: 17224762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
