These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Unravelling the illusion of flicker fusion. Umeton D; Read JC; Rowe C Biol Lett; 2017 Feb; 13(2):. PubMed ID: 28148834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Responses of movement-sensitive visual interneurons to prey-like stimuli in the praying mantis Sphodromantis lineola (Burmeister). Gonka MD; Laurie TJ; Prete FR Brain Behav Evol; 1999 Nov; 54(5):243-62. PubMed ID: 10640785 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Configural prey recognition by the praying mantis, Sphodromantis lineola (Burr.); effects of size and direction of movement. Prete FR Brain Behav Evol; 1990; 36(5):300-6. PubMed ID: 2285856 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Motion-in-depth perception and prey capture in the praying mantis Nityananda V; Joubier C; Tan J; Tarawneh G; Read JCA J Exp Biol; 2019 May; 222(Pt 11):. PubMed ID: 31064852 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Discrimination of visual stimuli representing prey versus non-prey by the praying mantis Sphodromantis lineola (Burr.). Prete FR Brain Behav Evol; 1992; 39(5):285-8. PubMed ID: 1498650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Stimulus speed and order of presentation effect the visually released predatory behaviors of the praying mantis Sphodromantis lineola (Burr.). Prete FR; Placek PJ; Wilson MA; Mahaffey RJ; Nemcek RR Brain Behav Evol; 1993; 42(6):281-94. PubMed ID: 8275297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quantifying camouflage: how to predict detectability from appearance. Troscianko J; Skelhorn J; Stevens M BMC Evol Biol; 2017 Jan; 17(1):7. PubMed ID: 28056761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In the corner of the eye: camouflaging motion in the peripheral visual field. Smart IE; Cuthill IC; Scott-Samuel NE Proc Biol Sci; 2020 Jan; 287(1918):20192537. PubMed ID: 31937225 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Antipredator defences in motion: animals reduce predation risks by concealing or misleading motion signals. Tan M; Zhang S; Stevens M; Li D; Tan EJ Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2024 Jun; 99(3):778-796. PubMed ID: 38174819 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The contrast sensitivity function of the praying mantis Sphodromantis lineola. Nityananda V; Tarawneh G; Jones L; Busby N; Herbert W; Davies R; Read JC J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2015 Aug; 201(8):741-50. PubMed ID: 25894490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Integration of Small- and Wide-Field Visual Features in Target-Selective Descending Neurons of both Predatory and Nonpredatory Dipterans. Nicholas S; Supple J; Leibbrandt R; Gonzalez-Bellido PT; Nordström K J Neurosci; 2018 Dec; 38(50):10725-10733. PubMed ID: 30373766 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prey speed influences the speed and structure of the raptorial strike of a 'sit-and-wait' predator. Rossoni S; Niven JE Biol Lett; 2020 May; 16(5):20200098. PubMed ID: 32396788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effects of background pattern and contrast on prey discrimination by the praying mantis Sphodromantis lineola (Burr.). Prete FR Brain Behav Evol; 1992; 40(6):311-20. PubMed ID: 1472990 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Finding a signal hidden among noise: how can predators overcome camouflage strategies? Galloway JAM; Green SD; Stevens M; Kelley LA Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2020 Jul; 375(1802):20190478. PubMed ID: 32420842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Visual stimulus characteristics that elicit tracking and striking in the praying mantises Parasphendale affinis, Popa spurca and Sphodromantis lineola. Prete FR; Theis R; Dominguez S; Bogue W J Exp Biol; 2013 Dec; 216(Pt 23):4443-53. PubMed ID: 24031054 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]