BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31523243)

  • 1. Diagnostic accuracy of gynecology imaging reporting and data system in evaluation of adnexal lesions.
    Behnamfar F; Adibi A; Khadra H; Moradi M
    J Res Med Sci; 2019; 24():57. PubMed ID: 31523243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. GI-RADS reporting system for ultrasound evaluation of adnexal masses in clinical practice: a prospective multicenter study.
    Amor F; Alcázar JL; Vaccaro H; León M; Iturra A
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Oct; 38(4):450-5. PubMed ID: 21465605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Diagnostic performance of the Gynecology Imaging Reporting and Data System for malignant adnexal masses.
    Zhang T; Li F; Liu J; Zhang S
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2017 Jun; 137(3):325-331. PubMed ID: 28295272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Gynecologic imaging reporting and data system: a new proposal for classifying adnexal masses on the basis of sonographic findings.
    Amor F; Vaccaro H; Alcázar JL; León M; Craig JM; Martinez J
    J Ultrasound Med; 2009 Mar; 28(3):285-91. PubMed ID: 19244063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Diagnostic value of the gynecology imaging reporting and data system (GI-RADS) with the ovarian malignancy marker CA-125 in preoperative adnexal tumor assessment.
    Migda M; Bartosz M; Migda MS; Kierszk M; Katarzyna G; Maleńczyk M
    J Ovarian Res; 2018 Nov; 11(1):92. PubMed ID: 30390688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Gynecology Imaging Reporting and Data System (GI-RADS): diagnostic performance and inter-reviewer agreement.
    Basha MAA; Refaat R; Ibrahim SA; Madkour NM; Awad AM; Mohamed EM; El Sammak AA; Zaitoun MMA; Dawoud HA; Khamis MEM; Mohamed HAE; El-Maghraby AM; Abdalla AAEM; Assy MM; Nada MG; Obaya AA; Abdelbary EH
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Nov; 29(11):5981-5990. PubMed ID: 30993433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The diagnostic performance of the Gynecologic Imaging Reporting and Data System (GI-RADS) in adnexal masses.
    Guo W; Zou X; Xu H; Zhang T; Zhao Y; Gao L; Duan W; Ma X; Zhang L
    Ann Transl Med; 2021 Mar; 9(5):398. PubMed ID: 33842619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of the diagnostic value of using serum CA125 and GI-RADS system in the evaluation of adnexal masses.
    Zheng H; Tie Y; Wang X; Yang Y; Wei X; Zhao X
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Feb; 98(7):e14577. PubMed ID: 30762809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of O-RADS, GI-RADS, and IOTA simple rules regarding malignancy rate, validity, and reliability for diagnosis of adnexal masses.
    Basha MAA; Metwally MI; Gamil SA; Khater HM; Aly SA; El Sammak AA; Zaitoun MMA; Khattab EM; Azmy TM; Alayouty NA; Mohey N; Almassry HN; Yousef HY; Ibrahim SA; Mohamed EA; Mohamed AEM; Afifi AHM; Harb OA; Algazzar HY
    Eur Radiol; 2021 Feb; 31(2):674-684. PubMed ID: 32809166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Diagnostic Performance of the Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System (O-RADS) Ultrasound Risk Score in Women in the United States.
    Jha P; Gupta A; Baran TM; Maturen KE; Patel-Lippmann K; Zafar HM; Kamaya A; Antil N; Barroilhet L; Sadowski EA
    JAMA Netw Open; 2022 Jun; 5(6):e2216370. PubMed ID: 35679042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of American College of Radiology Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System ultrasound to predict malignancy risk in adnexal lesions.
    Li Y; Shao G; Wu M; Zhang F; Zhang Y; Shao C
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2024 Feb; 50(2):225-232. PubMed ID: 37990446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ultrasound Assessment of Adnexal Pathology: Standardized Methods and Different Levels of Experience.
    Tavoraitė I; Kronlachner L; Opolskienė G; Bartkevičienė D
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2021 Jul; 57(7):. PubMed ID: 34356989
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of O-RADS, GI-RADS, and ADNEX for Diagnosis of Adnexal Masses: An External Validation Study Conducted by Junior Sonologists.
    Lai HW; Lyu GR; Kang Z; Li LY; Zhang Y; Huang YJ
    J Ultrasound Med; 2022 Jun; 41(6):1497-1507. PubMed ID: 34549454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ovarian Adnexal Reporting Data System (O-RADS) for Classifying Adnexal Masses: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Vara J; Manzour N; Chacón E; López-Picazo A; Linares M; Pascual MÁ; Guerriero S; Alcázar JL
    Cancers (Basel); 2022 Jun; 14(13):. PubMed ID: 35804924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bridging Communication Gaps Between Radiologists, Referring Physicians, and Patients Through Standardized Structured Cancer Imaging Reporting: The Experience with Female Pelvic MRI Assessment Using O-RADS and a Simulated Cohort Patient Group.
    Woo S; Andrieu PC; Abu-Rustum NR; Broach V; Zivanovic O; Sonoda Y; Chi DS; Aviki E; Ellis A; Carayon P; Hricak H; Vargas HA
    Acad Radiol; 2024 Apr; 31(4):1388-1397. PubMed ID: 37661555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. IETA Ultrasonic Features Combined with GI-RADS Classification System and Tumor Biomarkers for Surveillance of Endometrial Carcinoma: An Innovative Study.
    Lin D; Wang H; Liu L; Zhao L; Chen J; Tian H; Gao L; Wu B; Zhang J; Guo X; Hao Y
    Cancers (Basel); 2022 Nov; 14(22):. PubMed ID: 36428723
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sensitivity and Specificity of Ultrasonography Using Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System Classification Versus Pathology Findings for Ovarian Cancer.
    Solis Cano DG; Cervantes Flores HA; De Los Santos Farrera O; Guzman Martinez NB; Soria Céspedes D
    Cureus; 2021 Sep; 13(9):e17646. PubMed ID: 34650841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact of Adding Mean Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADCmean) Measurements to O-RADS MRI Scoring For Adnexal Lesions Characterization: A Combined O-RADS MRI/ADCmean Approach.
    Elshetry ASF; Hamed EM; Frere RAF; Zaid NA
    Acad Radiol; 2023 Feb; 30(2):300-311. PubMed ID: 36085271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Predictive accuracy and reproducibility of the O-RADS US scoring system among sonologists with different training levels.
    Wu M; Zhang M; Cao J; Wu S; Chen Y; Luo L; Lin X; Su M; Zhang X
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2023 Aug; 308(2):631-637. PubMed ID: 35994107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of the diagnostic efficiency between the O-RADS US risk stratification system and doctors' subjective judgment.
    Zhou S; Guo Y; Wen L; Liu J; Fu Y; Xu F; Liu M; Zhao B
    BMC Med Imaging; 2023 Nov; 23(1):190. PubMed ID: 37986051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.